The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #61  
Old 01-10-2012, 03:18 PM
Warren's Avatar
Administrator in Memoriam
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15,464

The Italian numeration followed that used by the Dukes of Savoy.
Vittorio Amedeo II, Duke of Savoy, became King Vittorio Amedeo II of Sardinia in 1720 when the Kingdom was ceded to the Dukes of Savoy;
King Vittorio Emanuele II of Sardinia became King Vittorio Emanuele II of Italy in 1861 when the Savoy dynasty assumed the new Crown following Italian unification.
__________________

__________________
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 01-10-2012, 05:34 PM
asma's Avatar
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: shebeen, Egypt
Posts: 240
[
Quote:
QUOTE=Warren;1356739]
The Italian numeration followed that used by the Dukes of Savoy.
Vittorio Amedeo II, Duke of Savoy, became King Vittorio Amedeo II of Sardinia in 1720 when the Kingdom was ceded to the Dukes of Savoy;
King Vittorio Emanuele II of Sardinia became King Vittorio Emanuele II of Italy in 1861 when the Savoy dynasty assumed the new Crown following Italian unification.
[/QUOTE]


Thanks warren.I want to add that Umberto I was supposed to be Umberto IV according to Dukes of Savoy numeration but he chose to be called the first as he was the first Umberto of the kingdom of Italy.
__________________

__________________
To die for something is better than to live for nothing.
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 01-10-2012, 06:34 PM
PrincessKaimi's Avatar
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Hilo, Malibu, United States
Posts: 1,331
Wikipedia looks correct to me (and detailed in its explanation).

When people misunderstand each other in text, it often helps to put more paragraph breaks in. Some of the misunderstood posts on this thread have used the dreaded "wall of text" format.

King John is another example of a male monarch without a number.
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 01-13-2012, 04:26 AM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: -, Antarctica
Posts: 1,272
Quote:
Originally Posted by Furienna View Post
I believe our Swedish king Oscar I was always known as Oscar I after he had become our king, even before his son was known as King Oscar II. But I'm not sure.
Oscar I was not known as Oscar I during his reign, you can check these coins minted during his reign, the inscription says "Oscar Sveriges Norr. Goth. och Vend. Konung" without any numeral. Oscar I

So if Victoria and Daniel have a son and gives him the name Wilhelm, there wouldn't be any numeral in his name when he becomes king as there haven't been any Swedish king named Wilhelm before him.
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 01-13-2012, 01:29 PM
PrincessKaimi's Avatar
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Hilo, Malibu, United States
Posts: 1,331
Great post, Maude - I guess we have to keep track of this nation by nation. Seems the majority of nations are similar to England...while those more closely connected to the Holy Roman Empire are apt to putting a number when one isn't strictly needed to distinguish the person? I'm sort of guessing what the summary of all this might be.
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 01-13-2012, 07:50 PM
Furienna's Avatar
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Örnsköldsvik, Sweden
Posts: 1,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meraude View Post
Oscar I was not known as Oscar I during his reign, you can check these coins minted during his reign, the inscription says "Oscar Sveriges Norr. Goth. och Vend. Konung" without any numeral. Oscar I

So if Victoria and Daniel have a son and gives him the name Wilhelm, there wouldn't be any numeral in his name when he becomes king as there haven't been any Swedish king named Wilhelm before him.
I see. Well, I said I wasn't sure.
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 09-02-2014, 11:30 PM
CyrilVladisla's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Conneaut, United States
Posts: 4,542
Francis (Francois) I of France issued silver coins bearing the legend FRANCISCVS I DE. GR FRANCORV. REX

There were times when sovereigns had more than one ordinal.
Ferdinand II was King of Aragon from 1479 until 1516. As Ferdinand V he was King of Castile from 1475 to 1504.

Charles I was King of Spain from 1516 until 1556. As Charles V he reigned as Holy Roman Emperor from 1519 to 1556.
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 04-01-2018, 08:41 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 4,479
Quote:
Originally Posted by CyrilVladisla View Post
There were times when sovereigns had more than one ordinal.
Ferdinand II was King of Aragon from 1479 until 1516. As Ferdinand V he was King of Castile from 1475 to 1504.
The next King of Spain to bear the name Ferdinand called himself Ferdinand VI, following the numbering of the kings of Castile. Why ?
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 04-01-2018, 09:21 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Bellevue, United States
Posts: 770
It seems all Spanish monarchs followed the numbering of the kings of Castile after the death of Ferdinand II/V in 1516.

Philip II (1527-1598) was actually Philip I in Aragon as his grandfather Philip I only ruled Castile.

Alfonso XII (1857-1885) followed the numbering of King Alfonso XI of Castile but was only the sixth Alfonso in Aragon.

I don't why but I suspect it was because Castile and Aragon were still two separate crowns (under one ruler) until they were united after the War of the Spanish Succession & the higher ordinal number was preferred.
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 04-02-2018, 04:49 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Bellevue, United States
Posts: 770
That's a good point. I suppose because the HRE wasn't Spanish it didn't count in terms of the Spanish ordinal - only Castile & Aragon.
Reply With Quote
  #71  
Old 04-02-2018, 05:12 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 4,479
Quote:
Originally Posted by CyrilVladisla View Post
Charles I was King of Spain from 1516 until 1556. As Charles V he reigned as Holy Roman Emperor from 1519 to 1556.
Indeed. That is why the next King of Spain after the Emperor with the name Charles was 'Charles II'.
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 04-02-2018, 06:11 PM
An Ard Ri's Avatar
Super Moderator
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: An Iarmhí, Ireland
Posts: 22,125
He was also Charles II of Sicily and Charles IV of Naples.
__________________
1st of February 1328 :Death of Charles IV de France
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 04-04-2018, 05:28 PM
CyrilVladisla's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Conneaut, United States
Posts: 4,542
Charles III was King of Spain from 1759 until 1788. He ruled Naples as Charles VII and Sicily as Charles V.
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 11-08-2018, 02:20 PM
Commoner
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Milton Keynes, United Kingdom
Posts: 23
I have often wondered with the disputed British Queens Matilda and Lady Jane Grey, whether if we ever had a future Queen Matilda or Jane whether they would be known as Matilda/Jane II.
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 11-08-2018, 04:09 PM
Ish's Avatar
Ish Ish is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 4,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saz83 View Post
I have often wondered with the disputed British Queens Matilda and Lady Jane Grey, whether if we ever had a future Queen Matilda or Jane whether they would be known as Matilda/Jane II.

I think that’s ultimately why they remain disputed while Edward V is not. His reign was confirmed retroactively by Edward VI. Matilda and Jane’s reigns have never been confirmed this way, despite Matilda at least having ruled longer.
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 11-08-2018, 04:23 PM
An Ard Ri's Avatar
Super Moderator
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: An Iarmhí, Ireland
Posts: 22,125
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saz83 View Post
I have often wondered with the disputed British Queens Matilda and Lady Jane Grey, whether if we ever had a future Queen Matilda or Jane whether they would be known as Matilda/Jane II.

Why would she have been Jane II?
__________________
1st of February 1328 :Death of Charles IV de France
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 11-08-2018, 05:03 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 12,063
Saz83 is suggesting that a future Quee Jane would be Jane II as there was Lady Jane Grey - the 9 days Queen. If she was actually a Queen she would surely be Jane I.

Matilda is a different case because at her time the title of King/Queen wasn't used until they were crowned and she never was. The best she was was the Lady of the English. She was approaching her coronation when her demands became so harsh that the people of London rose up against her and refused to allow her to be crowned. There was also the small question that there was a living consecrated King who had not abdicated but was simply a prisoner.

I would suspect that due to these controversies neither name would be used again for an heir apparent.
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 11-08-2018, 07:40 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Bellevue, United States
Posts: 770
No doubt there would experts for Queen Matilda or Jane to consult on the matter.
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
William III (Prince of Orange) (1650-1702) and Mary II (1662-1694), joint Monarchs Australian British Royal History 38 12-02-2018 07:28 PM
Coronation of British Monarchs Josefine British Royals 411 10-03-2018 06:08 PM
Monarchs & Royals During WWI & WWII? KikkiB Royalty Past, Present, and Future 62 09-23-2018 11:44 PM
Enthronement Ceremony of Dutch Monarchs pdas1201 Dutch Royals 69 09-20-2016 10:35 PM
Future Monarchical Ordinals Kotroman Royal Family of Spain 17 08-20-2016 10:56 PM




Popular Tags
belgian biography british royal family ceremony clothes corruption current events daughters de belgique denmark documentary duchessofcambridge duchess of sussex dutch royal family earl of wessex extramarital affairs fashion forum friendly city genetics germany gordon greece harry headship history infanta cristina interesting facts jacobite juan carlos king felipe king felipe vi lady louise mountbatten-windsor lineage meghan markle member porphyria prince harry prince harry of wales prince laurent princenapoleon princess beatrice princess claire princess eugenie princess of belgium queen elisabeth queen elizabeth queen letizia queen mary of teck remarriage royal royal ancestry royal family royal geneology royal ladies royal wedding sarah duchess of york savoy saxony siblings state visit swedish royal family tiara tom bower tradition van belgië wedding wedding of prince harry windsor windsor castle



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:34 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2019
Jelsoft Enterprises