The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #101  
Old 03-19-2013, 12:39 AM
lucien's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 6,630
Quote:
Originally Posted by HereditaryPrincess View Post
I'm not sure whether this is the right thread for my question, but does anyone know how many royal children were born at home? Or are most of them born in hospital nowadays? I think that two of the Behn sisters were born at Martha Louise's and Ari's county residence, but apart from that I'm not sure.
Queen Juliana's four daughters were all born at home,3 at Soestdijk Palace,one,Margriet,while in exile in Canada...well,actually Margriet was born in a hospital room in Ottawa that was declared Dutch soil..sort of home too...grin

All three sons of Queen Beatrix were born by ceasarian,as were the four children of Princess Irene of The Netherlands,including the present Duke of Parma.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 03-19-2013, 12:55 AM
Ish's Avatar
Ish Ish is offline
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,299
Quote:
Originally Posted by lucien View Post

Queen Juliana's four daughters were all born at home,3 at Soestdijk Palace,one,Margriet,while in exile in Canada...well,actually Margriet was born in a hospital room in Ottawa that was declared Dutch soil..sort of home too...grin

All three sons of Queen Beatrix were born by ceasarian,as were the four children of Princess Irene of The Netherlands,including the present Duke of Parma.
Technically speaking, Margriet was born in a Dutch hospital room run by a bunch of Canadians. Still Dutch, but not home.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 03-19-2013, 02:01 AM
Broadway Duchess's Avatar
Gentry
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Somewhere in America, United States
Posts: 69
Quote:
Originally Posted by sarahedwards2 View Post
I read in "The Royals" by Kitty Kelley that Charles was born by C-section, and that Elizabeth was under general anesthesia for it. I don't know the reasoning behind it, but the Queen (then Princess Elizabeth) isn't much bigger than me (5'4" vs. my 5'2"), and you try delivering a 7 lb. 6 oz. baby naturally at my size. Also, I am now older than she was when Charles was born (she was 22 years 208 days, and I'm 22 years 219 days).
I cannot remember where I read it but I thought Queen Elizabeth II had natural deliveries with her four children but that her mother had caesareans. I remember reading something along the lines of the then-Duchess of York laboring for some time and after awhile a "certain course of treatment was followed" because Princess Elizabeth was breech and thought to be too large. Back then, women didn't want to be that involved in the messy details and were likely to go with whatever the doctor suggested.

You'd be amazed at the capacity of the female body. I am 5'2" and gave birth to a 7lb. 3oz. baby after only 5-ish hours of labor. I wore home my pre-pregnancy jeans, too.
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 03-19-2013, 04:15 AM
blauerengel's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 1,738
A very interesting thread,I think itīs good that most royals opted for natural delivery and only for C-section when it was needed.Nowadays lots of women are afraid of natural birth and chose c-section even if it is not necessary by medical standards.
(Every woman should decide what they feel works best for them-but natural delivery is if you have a normal birth & baby still the healthiest choice.)

In India they say some women are "Too posh to push" when they chose c-section without medical reasons for it-thatīs why Aishwarya Rai (actress) stressed in her first press release that her child was delivered naturally.

I think that the size of the mother should not be over-emphasised-some petite women are extremely strong & healthy while other may be have less endurance,it really depends on each person and their health and will!
__________________
Security is mostly a superstition. It does not exist in nature, nor do the children of men as a whole experience it.
Avoiding danger in the long run is no safer than outright exposure.
Life is either a daring adventure,or nothing
. Helen Keller
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 02-19-2015, 11:21 PM
IloveCP's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: -, United States
Posts: 9,035
I assume Crown Princess Victoria gave birth to Estelle naturally as she left the hospital the same day she gave birth. Her sister Madeleine also gave birth naturally to Leonore.
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 02-19-2015, 11:34 PM
CrownPrincessJava's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ,, Australia
Posts: 450
Quote:
Originally Posted by IloveCP View Post
I assume Crown Princess Victoria gave birth to Estelle naturally as she left the hospital the same day she gave birth. Her sister Madeleine also gave birth naturally to Leonore.
Princesses Estelle and Leonore were delivered naturally. There would be no way any woman would be allowed to leave a few hours after a caesarean of their first child. It is major surgery. I was in hospital for 5 days with my first.
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 02-19-2015, 11:36 PM
Moonmaiden23's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 7,070
The current QEII and her late sister Margaret were both born via C-section delivery.

Grand Duchess Maria Teresa delivered her first child HGD Guillaume by caesarian and might have given birth to her four subsequent children that way as well.

Personally, I am very uncomfortable with the idea of preaching at women about which birth method they choose to have. The experience of pregnancy and labor/birth is often highly complex and subjective. The most important thing to consider is the health of the mother and baby, and I am sure any reputable obstetrician will take those factors into consideration, not whether or not the mother-to-be feels she is "too posh to push".

The idea of a famous woman-any woman-feeling she needs to go public and justify/explain such an intimate decision is just another example of a world going crazy, imo.

In other words....it's nobody's business.
__________________
"Be who God intended you to be, and you will set the world on fire" St. Catherine of Siena

Charlottesville,Virginia. USA. 08/12/2017
. SHAME.
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old 04-14-2017, 03:36 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 5,412
Update: Also Prince Aga Khan IV and Napoleon Bonaparte were born premature.
Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old 04-14-2017, 01:43 PM
carlota's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: , United States
Posts: 7,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by blauerengel View Post
A very interesting thread,I think itīs good that most royals opted for natural delivery and only for C-section when it was needed.Nowadays lots of women are afraid of natural birth and chose c-section even if it is not necessary by medical standards.
(Every woman should decide what they feel works best for them-but natural delivery is if you have a normal birth & baby still the healthiest choice.)

In India they say some women are "Too posh to push" when they chose c-section without medical reasons for it-thatīs why Aishwarya Rai (actress) stressed in her first press release that her child was delivered naturally.

I think that the size of the mother should not be over-emphasised-some petite women are extremely strong & healthy while other may be have less endurance,it really depends on each person and their health and will!
i think "Too posh to push" is commonly used all over the world by now

as light hearted as the expression is, i feel that it is still fairly crude. women may chose C sections over natural birth for reasons not pertaining not wanting 'to push', regardless of whether there is a medical reason so as to do it or not. as if all that was involved with birthing was pushing...
__________________
Sign the United Nations Universal Declaration on Animal Welfare: http://www.animalsmatter.org
YOUR DAILY CLICK HELPS ANIMALS SURVIVE!
Feed an animal in need, click for free.
http://www.theanimalrescuesite.com/
Take some time to sign the petitions @: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/animal-welfare/all
Reply With Quote
  #110  
Old 04-14-2017, 02:56 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,867
yes what an unpleasant way of thinking. Its up ot the Mother, in conjunction iwht her medical advisers to decide.
Reply With Quote
  #111  
Old 04-16-2017, 08:13 AM
Gentry
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Salzburg, Austria
Posts: 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by lucien View Post
Queen Juliana's four daughters were all born at home,3 at Soestdijk Palace,one,Margriet,while in exile in Canada...well,actually Margriet was born in a hospital room in Ottawa that was declared Dutch soil..sort of home too...grin

All three sons of Queen Beatrix were born by ceasarian,as were the four children of Princess Irene of The Netherlands,including the present Duke of Parma.
Why were all of them born by ceasarean ? Were complications during the birth ?
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 04-16-2017, 10:30 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Torrance, United States
Posts: 3,207
Back when Beatrix was having children if the first birth was cesarean then all subsequent ones would be cesarean as well.
Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 08-05-2017, 12:14 AM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 569
According to "The Royal Baby Book: A Heir-Raising History of All Things Royal Baby" by Alison James (excellent read, I highly recommend it!), Charles, Anne, Andrew and Edward were indeed all born by Caesarean, Charles after a 30-hour labour, and he is thought to have been breech like his mother. Also, both David and Sarah were C-sections because "image-conscious Margaret did not approve of natural childbirth because it meant the babies wouldn't arrive in the world looking perfect!"


Sent from my iPod touch using The Royals Community
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 08-05-2017, 05:15 AM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by TLLK View Post
Back when Beatrix was having children if the first birth was cesarean then all subsequent ones would be cesarean as well.
Princess Margriet had her four sons by cesarean and if I am right her sister Christina had also cesarean for her three children.
There was a pic in the paper, five days after the birth of Juliana Guillermo, where mother and child were brought home on a ambulance-stretcher
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 08-05-2017, 05:27 AM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,197
The Countess of Wessex had both her children by cesarean section
Reply With Quote
  #116  
Old 08-05-2017, 06:39 AM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,867
Quote:
Originally Posted by sarahedwards2 View Post
According to "The Royal Baby Book: A Heir-Raising History of All Things Royal Baby" by Alison James (excellent read, I highly recommend it!), Charles, Anne, Andrew and Edward were indeed all born by Caesarean, Charles after a 30-hour labour, and he is thought to have been breech like his mother. Also, both David and Sarah were C-sections because "image-conscious Margaret did not approve of natural childbirth because it meant the babies wouldn't arrive in the world looking perfect!"


Sent from my iPod touch using The Royals Community
Never hard of this and I would find it hard to believe. Partly because I believe that in the 50s and 60s they didn't recommend that anyone should have more htan 2 or 3 Caesarians. And if the queen had had all her children born by Caesarian I'm sure it would have been publicly mentioned.. It wasn't by then something that would be discreetly hidden, at least not by the 60s. This just sounds like well I have to say nonsense...
Reply With Quote
  #117  
Old 08-05-2017, 01:50 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,412
Prince Jacques and Princess Gabriella of Monaco were born via c-section. I don't know if their birth was complicated or if it was decided to do this in advance.
Reply With Quote
  #118  
Old 08-06-2017, 04:41 AM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,867
I think that it is probable that there were good medical reasons for the Monaco children to be born by C section. It seems as if Charlene had some troubles conceiving and she's not very young. They may have feared her having problems giving birth and as these children were long awaited heirs...
Reply With Quote
  #119  
Old 08-14-2017, 04:04 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 569
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denville View Post
I think that it is probable that there were good medical reasons for the Monaco children to be born by C section. It seems as if Charlene had some troubles conceiving and she's not very young. They may have feared her having problems giving birth and as these children were long awaited heirs...

Twins born to older mothers are usually delivered by C-section anyways.


Sent from my iPod touch using The Royals Community
Reply With Quote
  #120  
Old 08-14-2017, 06:34 PM
carlota's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: , United States
Posts: 7,480
i imagine the babies born to the latest generation of swedish royals were mostly born naturally, given how quickly the mums left the hospitals? i recall victoria left some days, if not hours, after delivering both estelle and oskar, and, from memory, it was similar for sofia with alexander and madeleine with nicholas. i cannot remember madde left with leonore.

i believe kate wanted a natural birth too, so i would have a tendency to say george and charlotte were born that way, but i don't think it was ever confirmed. she also left the hospital very soon after, so it is quite likely this was the case.

given that letizia had 2 C-sections for leonor and sofia, she did quite well to leave hospital in heels and carrying the babies herself (albeit she stayed in hospital for a week or so each time).

leaving with leonor

leaving with sofia
__________________

__________________
Sign the United Nations Universal Declaration on Animal Welfare: http://www.animalsmatter.org
YOUR DAILY CLICK HELPS ANIMALS SURVIVE!
Feed an animal in need, click for free.
http://www.theanimalrescuesite.com/
Take some time to sign the petitions @: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/animal-welfare/all
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Do Royals Have To Be Born In Their Own Country? Lumutqueen Royal Life and Lifestyle 46 11-15-2015 01:36 PM
Christening Of Constantine Alexios, born 29 October 1998 Josefine Crown Prince Pavlos, Marie Chantal and Family 30 05-03-2015 06:23 PM
Christening Of Achileas-Andreas, born August 2000 Josefine Crown Prince Pavlos, Marie Chantal and Family 12 05-15-2012 09:49 AM
Ingrid - Queen of Denmark, born Princess of Sweden (1910-2000) Josefine Swedish Royal History 32 01-20-2011 04:48 AM




Popular Tags
albania best gown september 2016 best outfit birthday carl gustaf catherine middleton style crown princess mary crown princess mary eveningwear crown princess mary fashion crown princess mette-marit eveningwear crown princess victoria daytime fashion denmark duchess of cambridge duke of cambridge dutch state visit earl of snowdon fashion poll fashion poll december iceland jewels king abdullah ii king carl gustaf and queen silvia king willem-alexander monarchy nobel 2016 noice november 2016 october 2016 picture of the week prince charles prince harken in canada princess mary princess mary fashion princess sofia princess sofias hats queen elizabeth ii queen letizia queen letizia casual outfits queen letizia cocktail dresses queen letizia daytime fashion queen letizia eveningwear queen letizia fashion queen letizia gala dresses queen mathilde queen mathilde daytime fashion queen mathilde fashion queen maxima queen maxima casual wear queen maxima daytime fashion queen maxima fashion queen maxima hats queen maxima style queen rania queen rania eveningwear queen rania fashion queen silvia romania september 2016 state visit state visit from argentina successes succession sweden the duchess of cambridge casual wear the duchess of cambridge daytime fashion the duchess of cambridge fashion the duchess of cambridge hats tiara united kingdom visit to canada


Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities


Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:41 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2017
Jelsoft Enterprises