The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #1  
Old 09-21-2005, 01:18 PM
carlota's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: , United States
Posts: 5,712
Royal women: more popular?

i always have the impression that royal women are the ones who most catch the attention of the press (think about mathilde, maxima, mette marit, mary and letizia, rania, salma benanni and an extense etcetera). something similar is happening now with camilla, sophie rhys jones and of course the press all time favourite caroline and (although not as much) sister stephanie or super popular lady di, just to mention a few. why do you think it is? is it because women attract more than men or because as most of them are new to the royal environment the press is interested on them?
it's quite curious... talking about the first stated group they were all comoners (except mathilde) and it would be sensible if the press were more interested in their husbands as they introduced them into royalty, but they are interested on their wives. is it because they are new and the people want to know about them?

what do you all think? any hypothesis on this?
__________________

__________________
Sign the United Nations Universal Declaration on Animal Welfare: http://www.animalsmatter.org
YOUR DAILY CLICK HELPS ANIMALS SURVIVE!
Feed an animal in need, click for free.
http://www.theanimalrescuesite.com/
Take some time to sign the petitions @: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/animal-welfare/all
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-21-2005, 01:54 PM
pollyemma's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Washington,DC, United States
Posts: 2,013
I definitely think you're right. it's remarkable the way wives invariably get more attention even if they are the commoners and the royals are men. I think it has a lot to do with appearance.

in this day and age fashion has set some pretty narrow limits on men's appearances.(we've come a long way from the days of Henry VIII's flamboyant outfits) royal men are expected to have short hair wear and wear standard suits or military uniforms for public occasions. they look the same most of the time.

occasionally I'll look at a royal man and go "wow what a great tie" or "his suit is well cut" but beyond that, there isnt much to say.

even their off duty gear is usually pretty standard. frederick is something of an exeption in this area, and I think he gets more attention than most royal men because of it.

take prinsjesdag yesterday, we all knew(well, some of us:) Willem-Alexander would wear his uniform. that's that. moving on...what will beatrix's hat look like this time? will it be vermeulen again for Laurentien? all much more interesting questions (not to mention more interesting photos for the media).
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-21-2005, 02:16 PM
sara1981's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: North Little Rock, United States
Posts: 3,448
many people love Princess Diana more ever! since her marriages to Prince Charles in 1981 till 1997 and people gives Diana flowers everyday and every years because she still as Princess im tell you about it!

and CP Mary very popular also because many people love her very much like Diana did and also Maxima too!

Sara Boyce
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-21-2005, 02:45 PM
corazon's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: -In some dark place-, Argentina
Posts: 2,080
diana, of course.
No princess in the worl will can be so popular like diana.
__________________
Today the world has embraced new royal Princesses in the form of Mary of Denmark and Maxima of the Netherlands. But it's questionable whether even these hugely popular, increasingly glamorous future Queens will ever capture the world's imagination in the same way as Diana.
As Mario acknowledges: "She really was a true Princess".
-www.theroyalist.net-
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-21-2005, 02:59 PM
SpiffyBallerina's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: , United States
Posts: 531
I know this might be an unpopular opinion, but I very firmly believe it : The royal women seem to do a better job. I'd take a Queen Beatrix or a Queen Margrethe over any man to be the head of my country. They just seem more devoted to me. Another reason why royal women get more attention is the fact that they wear dresses! A man has so few options- a suit is basically it. A woman, on the other hand, has an endless opportunity to wear fancy and elegant clothes. Also, it is usually the women who have to make a lot of sacrifices to be with their husbands. You have to really love a person and love their people in order to agree to represent them. My last point is this: little girls want to be princesses; little boys rarely have the fantasy of being princes. It's only natural that we should still be captivated by something so glamourous.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-21-2005, 03:15 PM
pollyemma's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Washington,DC, United States
Posts: 2,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpiffyBallerina
I know this might be an unpopular opinion, but I very firmly believe it : The royal women seem to do a better job. I'd take a Queen Beatrix or a Queen Margrethe over any man to be the head of my country. They just seem more devoted to me. Another reason why royal women get more attention is the fact that they wear dresses! A man has so few options- a suit is basically it. A woman, on the other hand, has an endless opportunity to wear fancy and elegant clothes. Also, it is usually the women who have to make a lot of sacrifices to be with their husbands. You have to really love a person and love their people in order to agree to represent them. My last point is this: little girls want to be princesses; little boys rarely have the fantasy of being princes. It's only natural that we should still be captivated by something so glamourous.
I agree with a lot of what you say but I don't agree that royal women have to make more sacrifices. perhaps in real life thats true.

but in general common men who mary royal women (or even royal men who do) have it a lot harder than women marrying princes. its a much tougher role. its even less defined than the already pretty undefined role of princess. it takes a strong intelligent man to be able to do it right.

Prince Claus and Pieter van Vollenhoven are, i think, 2 examples of men who do it well. though Prince Claus definitely had a hard time of. Prince Henrik has struggled immensely to find his place.

take for instance Carl Gustav and Silvia. she is clearly the more popular one.she does her job so well. he does his duty ok even if he is a bit stiff. if she were the one born royal and was Queen in her own right, CG would just be this background figure. Now, he's the king. he's officially number 1. he gives the speeches and immediately has a clear cut place even if she is more popular and does the job better.

I think the whole set up is so much better for them. one partner isnt left behind.

well anyway, all to say that men who marry royal ladies have it REALLY though.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-21-2005, 03:41 PM
BeatrixFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,843
Re:

Hmm. I think Crown Princess Mary, Crown Princess Letizia and Crown Princess Maxima will all be more popular than Diana. And their children will be even more popular still. The reason? Diana is dead. Yes, we remember her. But the young generation don't and in truth, she's just going to be a footnote in history. It would have been different had she been Queen but in reality, she's the late ex-wife of the Prince of Wales (King Charles III).
Once we're gone, the world won't have the primary sources and people will begin to forget. Also, the idea of monarchy may change significantly.
Diana is gone and the press are now turning to other Princesses of the world to idolise. It won't be long before she's replaced for the next generation no-matter how much the older generation liked her.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-21-2005, 03:52 PM
corazon's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: -In some dark place-, Argentina
Posts: 2,080
but with diana alive now, another princess would be popular'???
diana was more front page of magazine later her death that all the princess of today together.
Exemple: Diana was a diferent hair and was front page all magazine of the world, letizia, maxima, mary, mathilde, mette marit etc have a diferent hair and no all the world speaks of that.
Yes, are diferent times, diferent persons but none princess is the past and in the future can be like diana. She change the monarchy's vision for the people, none princess do it.
__________________
Today the world has embraced new royal Princesses in the form of Mary of Denmark and Maxima of the Netherlands. But it's questionable whether even these hugely popular, increasingly glamorous future Queens will ever capture the world's imagination in the same way as Diana.
As Mario acknowledges: "She really was a true Princess".
-www.theroyalist.net-
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-21-2005, 04:00 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 617
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeatrixFan
Hmm. I think Crown Princess Mary, Crown Princess Letizia and Crown Princess Maxima will all be more popular than Diana. And their children will be even more popular still. The reason? Diana is dead. Yes, we remember her. But the young generation don't and in truth, she's just going to be a footnote in history. It would have been different had she been Queen but in reality, she's the late ex-wife of the Prince of Wales (King Charles III).
Once we're gone, the world won't have the primary sources and people will begin to forget.
I totally agree. Just look at Diana's early eighties-dresses - today some of them look ridiculous, and young girls won't admire the style and idolize its wearer.

BTW, royal women mostly seem to do a great job - just compare Frederik to Mary in the last couple of weeks, or some of the queens. They've done a tremendous job generating acceptance for the monarchy through doing their job well.
.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-21-2005, 04:08 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 767
i agree.......Diana was known internationally.....really well known even in asia and countries around the world ...none of the crown princess today have that popularity (at least internationally...maybe in their countires they are popular, but other than that, people don't know them as they had known Diana)

But of course, you might argue that Mary is popular in Australia, Maxima is popular in Argentina, that's because they are from that country, people from that country would be very interested in following what they are up to in they new adopted country...other than that...in my own opinion, they are not popular at all around the world.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-21-2005, 04:18 PM
ysbel's Avatar
Heir Apparent
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 5,390
The royal women definitely get more attention on this board. I think pollyemma definitely has a point. If you're interested in the royals for fashion, you're not going to get excited by the uniforms of the crown princes.

I'm interested in the royals for their family dynamics, they're like no other type of family in the world. So the guys interest me as much as the women. But its hard to find good information on them.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-21-2005, 04:43 PM
pollyemma's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Washington,DC, United States
Posts: 2,013
BTW, I think Carlota intended this thread to be an analysis of why royal women get so much more attention than their male counterparts.

if you want to devote a thread to discussion of which royal lady is the best, please do start one. but don't hijack someone else's.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-21-2005, 09:30 PM
Paula**'s Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 661
Charlotte Casiraghi is getting very popular :p
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-21-2005, 10:35 PM
Humera's Avatar
Super Moderator
Picture of the Month Representative - Brunei, Malaysia & Dubai
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: , Canada
Posts: 6,679
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigheadshirmp
i agree.......Diana was known internationally.....really well known even in asia and countries around the world ...none of the crown princess today have that popularity (at least internationally...maybe in their countires they are popular, but other than that, people don't know them as they had known Diana)

But of course, you might argue that Mary is popular in Australia, Maxima is popular in Argentina, that's because they are from that country, people from that country would be very interested in following what they are up to in they new adopted country...other than that...in my own opinion, they are not popular at all around the world.
very true. I've made this point so often on this board.
No princess has the sort of international profile that Diana had. She was an international figure almost from the beginning, from her engagement, wedding, all the way to her death. Her entire life was played out on the world stage. Her popularity transcended cultural and linguistic boundries. She was just as well known and loved in Japan as she was in Britain, or North America, for example.
The European Crown Princesses migth be popular in their countries, and have some following in the nations of their origin, but on an international scale, they are unknowns. Their weddings might have generated a few international headlines but that doesnt translate into general interest.
Same can be said of royals in general, whether its european royals, asian royals etc. They're basically unknowns outside of their respective countries/regions, unless ofcourse you're talking about royal watchers.
Its sometimes difficult to keep an accurate perspective when you see that we have members on this forum from all over the world. But we're a small and select group with a shared interest.
Its nice to see that the new crown princesses are popular and loved in their countries, but go to the average person on the street in any country outside of Europe, in Asia, or Africa, North America etc, and ask them who Mary, Letizia, Maxima, Mathilde or Mette Marit is, no one would have a clue. But ask them who Princess Diana is, and they'd know.
I myself am a very good example of that. I consider myself a well-informed person. But before joining this forum the only royals I knew about were the British royal family, and Queen Rania. And while I have studied and am familiar with most European history I didnt know so many of the European nations were still monarchies.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-21-2005, 10:45 PM
corazon's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: -In some dark place-, Argentina
Posts: 2,080
Humera, I totally totally agree with you. Amen.
__________________
Today the world has embraced new royal Princesses in the form of Mary of Denmark and Maxima of the Netherlands. But it's questionable whether even these hugely popular, increasingly glamorous future Queens will ever capture the world's imagination in the same way as Diana.
As Mario acknowledges: "She really was a true Princess".
-www.theroyalist.net-
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-21-2005, 11:10 PM
Margrethe II's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 917
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigheadshirmp
i agree.......Diana was known internationally.....really well known even in asia and countries around the world ...none of the crown princess today have that popularity (at least internationally...maybe in their countires they are popular, but other than that, people don't know them as they had known Diana)

But of course, you might argue that Mary is popular in Australia, Maxima is popular in Argentina, that's because they are from that country, people from that country would be very interested in following what they are up to in they new adopted country...other than that...in my own opinion, they are not popular at all around the world.
Agree 100%

"MII"
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-22-2005, 12:54 AM
ysbel's Avatar
Heir Apparent
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 5,390
Quote:
Originally Posted by pollyemma
BTW, I think Carlota intended this thread to be an analysis of why royal women get so much more attention than their male counterparts.

if you want to devote a thread to discussion of which royal lady is the best, please do start one. but don't hijack someone else's.
That's what I thought too.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-22-2005, 01:45 AM
Warren's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15,352
When the Royal men start wearing tiaras we'll take more of an interest in them. :)

More seriously, the British Monarchy is seen as the "senior" and most glamorous dynasty in the world. If William continues his relationship with Kate Middleton and they start being seen in public together, media interest won't be confined to Britain, Australia and other Commonwealth countries; soon enough everyone else will be aware of who she is.

We probably won't see the Diana phenomenon again, as in "Kate, Princess Superstar", but the media focus will be intense. And then William will have to deal with the situation where his partner may possibly outshine him in terms of public interest. Which of course brings us back to Carlota's question.

We more or less "know" William; for Kate (or whoever it will be) we won't know much. There will be a transformation from commoner to Princess (real and fantasised); there will be keen discussion about her hair, figure, clothes, jewels, tiaras, pregnancy rumours, state of marriage, babies, motherhood etc etc. And the whole cycle starts anew.

The Prince/King may be the bedrock of state and Royal continuity, but the Princess/Queen is the glamour figure and focus of public interest. Statecraft is worthy, but dull, whereas diamonds and gowns are the stuff of dreams.
.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-22-2005, 10:59 AM
Emilia's Avatar
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: vlaams brabant, Belgium
Posts: 146
Princees Mathilde is very populair in Belgium and France , especially by old lady's !
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-23-2005, 04:39 AM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 888
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren
When the Royal men start wearing tiaras we'll take more of an interest in them. :)
The Prince/King may be the bedrock of state and Royal continuity, but the Princess/Queen is the glamour figure and focus of public interest. Statecraft is worthy, but dull, whereas diamonds and gowns are the stuff of dreams.
.
Excately, very agree....I think that the main reason why royal ladies get more attention from royal watcher (who most of them are ladies!!!!:))
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Australian Royal Family Australian Royal Chit Chat 51 05-18-2008 08:57 AM
Royal Toys Mandy Royal House of Norway 6 06-13-2003 12:51 AM




Additional Links
Popular Tags
birth charlene chris o'neill crown prince frederik crown prince haakon crown princess letizia crown princess mary crown princess mette-marit crown princess victoria current events diana dutch royal history engagement fashion genealogy grand duchess maria teresa grand duke henri habsburg hohenzollern infanta sofia jordan king abdullah ii king carl xvi gustav king felipe king felipe vi king harald king juan carlos king philippe king willem-alexander luxembourg olympics ottoman pom pregnancy prince albert prince albert ii prince carl philip prince constantijn prince felipe prince felix prince floris prince pieter-christiaan princess princess alexia (2005 -) princess anita princess ariane princess beatrix princess catharina-amalia princess charlene princess laurentien princess letizia princess mabel princess madeleine princess margriet princess mary princess of asturias queen letizia queen mathilde queen maxima queen paola queen rania queen silvia queen sofia royal russia sofia hellqvist spain state visit wedding william



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:59 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014
Jelsoft Enterprises

Royal News Delivered to your Email!

You can get the latest Royal News right in your inbox.

unsusbcribe at anytime with one click

Close [X]