General News & Information about Albert, Charlene & Family 2: March 2012 - May 2015


If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Status
Not open for further replies.
i like this picture, and i'm glad to see charlene with a tiara :)
i find the ocean tiara a bit too busy, but it suits her beautifully as charlene is quite a classical beauty... so it doesn't look like too much on her.
i hope she takes pleasure now in using tiaras and we see her more and more with one... she would look ravishing!
 
She wore it as a necklace on August 15, 2011. See the link; scroll down a bit. Lamutamu.com – For Everything Exotic.

She's wearing it as a tiara on this link ; second row, far right: Princess Charlene of Monaco on Pinterest

As for the Hola cover; it's one of the pictures where the line between "royal" and "celebrity" has become so fine you need a magnifying glass to see it. I'm not sure I like the trend at all.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Princess Charlene Current Events - Part 2: January 2014 -

I am disappointed that Charlene has chosen a celebrity magazine for the first proper glimpse of this tiara ( I know she has previously worn it as a necklace). I agree that the shot does nothing to enhance her status as Princess of Monaco.


Magazines such as LIFE, LOOK,SATURDAY EVENING POST etc are no longer in print. Princess Grace frequently had cover stories for these magazines. Magazines these days are mostly celebrity magazines. Even VANITY FAIR has celebrity stories and covers to compete with the usual celebrity ones.
 
Last edited:
:previous:

Obvious or not-obvious, the picture is photoshopped indeed, the tiara is too large and looks too bright. The Hola! cover was the first time that this tiara was seen in public as a tiara. The photo used seems to come from her civil wedding, where she had simular earrings, hair & make-up.
--

The pictures of the princess of Monaco are rather glamourous, model-ish etc. indeed. But since she is the princess of Monaco you might say that it comes with the title. I usually hate it when royals pose for glamour/fashion magazines but in Charlene's case (and only in Charlene's case) it makes sense. As the appeal of Monaco is the glamour, casino's, parties, the jetset, and that is the way how the Grimaldi's present themselves. I am quite sure that they would have a very different PR strategy when they would be ruling over the Isle of Man.

I had my doubts about this particular tiara before. I didn't know if I should love it or hate it. But on these pictures I dislike it immensely. It looks like a fake rhinestone tiara. Partly due to the styling (the tiara is used as a headband), partly due to the photographer (the muted colours used take away all lustre from the stones) and partly due to the design (the base on which the circles rest seems too small for the tiara).

However I think that the tiara will look different when seen in real life. So I will hold my judgement until then, but for now I very much prefer the Foam-hairpiece. I am surprised to see the tiara at all btw, I thought it was just a PR deal between the Grimaldi's and the jeweller.
 
Last edited:
Love the hairstyle, the makeup is wonderful and the tiara is epic. I see nothing wrong with the photo and since the tiara is hers, it is her choice as to when and where she wears it.

Actually, I think it is a perfectly splendid photo.

I fail to see wat is "epic" about that diadem but I acknowledge that taste is in the eye of the beholder. Of course there is nothing wrong with the photo's, I fully agree with you on that. I think the photo's are quite professional and well-made.

What is wrong is the image which these photo's generate. They do nothing to frame the former swimmer Charlene Wittstock for once and for all as Son Altesse Sérénissime la Princesse de Monaco. Charlène, the palais princier and Hola! could have taken this opportunity to make for once and for all clear that she is THE Princess of Monaco, the Première Dame of the principality and no one else. Instead they have totally missed the opportunity and shot the ball aside the wide open goalpost. Now we see a photoshoot with Gwyneth Paltrow, pardon Natalie Portman, eh... who's that blonde here?

:ermm:
 
As KityAtlanta, I love the hairstyle, the make up, Charlene is stunning and it is her tiara, she could wear it as she wants.
Palace of Monaco gave her agrements for this interview and for these photos.
As use many persons here jump on photo to critic charlene . All the prinesses and the queens are photoshopped.
For me a princess is not a person who wears tiara, for me it is a work , it is giving to the persons who need to live

I found these photos wonderfull and what she is saying in the interview is more important that woring a tiara.

Other photos in the newspaper, Charlene is wonderful

DİDEM'İN NOT DEFTERİ: MONACO PRENSESİ CHARLENE İSPANYOL HOLA DERGİSİNDE
 
[...] For me a princess is not a person who wears tiara, for me it is a work [...]

How to you connect 'princess' and 'work' with the Hola! frontcover photo giving the image of someone just getting out of bed?

;) :cool:
 
What she says in the interview is something like "my husband is my closest person" etc. Such confidential pearls of wisdom.
 
Princess Charlene did a good work, I do not recall your comments when there are news and photos of Charlene on the prince Albert and princess Charlene events or on princess Charlene events.
No comments when she opened the princess charlene meeting for the handicaped children, no comments when she is doing charity event for monaa, no comments when she was inaugurated new nursery or when she is opening a new program of her foundation ' learn to swim', no comments yesterday when she was doing a charity event yesterday with the team of carabinieris.
 
How to you connect 'princess' and 'work' with the Hola! frontcover photo giving the image of someone just getting out of bed?

;) :cool:

Don't you get it? :) That's because being a princess is a full-time job, and princesses wear a tiara when they sleep. They walk around in pale-grey satin gowns and sigh to the wind on the balconies of their palaces.
 
Princess Charlene did a good work, I do not recall your comments when there are news and photos of Charlene on the prince Albert and princess Charlene events or on princess Charlene events.
No comments when she opened the princess charlene meeting for the handicaped children, no comments when she is doing charity event for monaa, no comments when she was inaugurated new nursery or when she is opening a new program of her foundation ' learn to swim', no comments yesterday when she was doing a charity event yesterday with the team of carabinieris.

Do you want me to hoist a flag and declare it a national holiday when she climbs down the ladder from her balcony? In essence, people comment on what they want to comment on, and that's the way it goes.
 
Just to let Princess Charlene fans know that this week's Hello! Magazine has a rather nice 14 page spread interviewing her. It's mainly pictures of-course, but she talks about her charity, and how much of a support Prince Albert is to her etc. Some of the photos feature Princess Charlene wearing her Ocean Tiara.
Thought I'd mention it, but please move this post if it is in the incorrect location!
 
Just to let Princess Charlene fans know that this week's Hello! Magazine has a rather nice 14 page spread interviewing her. It's mainly pictures of-course, but she talks about her charity, and how much of a support Prince Albert is to her etc. Some of the photos feature Princess Charlene wearing her Ocean Tiara.
Thought I'd mention it, but please move this post if it is in the incorrect location!
:previous: Thank you for this. I wonder if any of the photos are different to the Hola spread.
 
I am not sure if this is the right place to put this. I picked up the German magazine Stern at the airport and there is an article that includes an interview with Gareth Wittstock. It is alarming.

The reporter says that they received a threatening call from someone who purported to represent the palace. The article actually claims that a male representative threatened them, in french accented English, with physical violence if they spoke to the wittstocks again without palace permission or went back to the house in France!

Imagine the furor if the palace in Britain had done such a thing regarding the middletons. Is this a new more desperate palace tactic or a nut pretending? It certainly does not invite a warm feeling given the shooting of a monaco elderly woman and her chauffeur! It makes monaco seem to have resorted to mafia thug tactics in lieu of professional pr.

Has anyone read the rest?
 
Last edited:
I doubt very much if the caller, if there really was one, is from the palace. The Grimaldis always let their lawyers handle everything.
 
I doubt very much if the caller, if there really was one, is from the palace. The Grimaldis always let their lawyers handle everything.

There is no question that the call happened. Stern is not a tabloid. It is well respected, something like Time magazine. The authors, Andreas Albes and Jörg Zipprick, are not known for sensational tabloid style writing. The Grimaldis have staff other than attorneys. The lawyers are not the only people who communicate for them.

The threat came after the journalists interviewed Gareth Wittstock at his home in La Turbie. The caller knew they had been there and said that if the did not go through the palace in the future they "would see what happened...I warn you, we will find you ..." Chilling.

Think on it. Threatening a journalist with physical violence for reporting the truth. Monaco should quickly investigate this mafia thug acting on their behalf!
 
Wouldn't Mr. Wittstock have checked it was okay too? It can't be every day that he is approached for an interview, and given the family's known wariness to speaking to the media, he seems incredibly naive to have gone ahead without checking it out first.
 
I find it hard to believe that Gareth Wittstock would (a) give an interview without consulting the palace (the Wittstock family has generally been quite good at 'managing' the media), or (b) that someone from the palace would make himself guilty of such bullying behaviour. It all smells very fishy.

So what does Gareth say in the interview? And why would any credible writer/publication be interested in speaking to him anyway?
 
Sounds like someone is making news for news sake. They can't squeeze anything else out of the Charlene and Albert marriage so now they're going for the Wittstocks.
 
The only thing I know it's that the wittstocks and charlene herself in the past gave interview without asking permission to the palace...
 
Formal interviews? I don't think so. Casually replying to media questions, yes. But they've also learned that the media is a tricky beast to have dealings with and managed to keep a low profile -- without any sordid scandals. They obviously receive support and advice from the palace in these matters, so by now I would imagine they know better.
 
I just realized it may make a difference if the interview took place in Monaco. I think all journalists and photographers are required to register with the government and get approval no matter who they want to talk to or photograph. It is part of their privacy law. It is part of Monaco's appeal to A listers who don't want to be harrassed by the press while they are on vacation.
 
I just realized it may make a difference if the interview took place in Monaco. I think all journalists and photographers are required to register with the government and get approval no matter who they want to talk to or photograph. It is part of their privacy law. It is part of Monaco's appeal to A listers who don't want to be harrassed by the press while they are on vacation.

No, the interview took place in La Turbie, France. Gareth said in the interview that he lives there because he does not know whom to trust in Monaco.

Even if it had been in Monaco, threats of violence against a journalist? Is this the Middle Ages? Gareth had a choice of giving the interview or not. There is no excuse at all for threatening physical violence!

Every single one of the Wittstocks have given multiple interviews over the years. Sean's wedding was covered by Bunte and the pictures were sold by Sean as an exclusive.

For the record, many credible magazines and journalists have interviewed or covered the family. They are asked for the same reason magazines pursue interviews with Tatiana Blatnik's mother, Pippa, or the Donaldson family.

In this case it is a very reputable source. If Buckingham palace had done this after Pippa had voluntarily done an interview would anyone be brushing it off as trying to make news? Would it be okay because a-listers want privacy? What if it had been 10 Downing Street, would it be dismissed off-hand?

It is not a conspiracy to sell papers. It is appalling, disgusting behaviour! It should not be brushed off. If the palace had no part in it, they (and the French police) should investigate.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom