the royal forums

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Other Things Royal > Royal Jewels > Royal Jewels Chit Chat




Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #201  
Old 04-03-2008, 11:55 PM
jcbcode99's Avatar
jcbcode99 jcbcode99 is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Richmond Area, United States
Posts: 1,319
Default

That Danish emerald parue--I think the picture of it alone just does not do it justice. The second link shows it being worn and I really like it--it reminds me of Princess Mary's.
__________________
Janet

"We make a living by what we do; we make a life by what we give" Winston Churchill
Reply With Quote
  #202  
Old 04-04-2008, 04:36 AM
candygirl_68's Avatar
candygirl_68 candygirl_68 is offline
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: -, France
Posts: 248
Default

yes but THAT alone? eew...
but worn, it looks better!
__________________
If you have much, give of your wealth; If you have little, give of your heart-arab proverb
Reply With Quote
  #203  
Old 04-04-2008, 09:38 AM
jcbcode99's Avatar
jcbcode99 jcbcode99 is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Richmond Area, United States
Posts: 1,319
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by candygirl_68 View Post
yes but THAT alone? eew...
but worn, it looks better!
The picture of the parue by itself have a yellow tint to them--making it look a bit garish and well, cheap. But, on, it has this lacy platinum/white gold set with diamonds and emeralds composition that is simply beautiful! The photo of it by itself does not do it justice at all.
__________________
Janet

"We make a living by what we do; we make a life by what we give" Winston Churchill
Reply With Quote
  #204  
Old 04-04-2008, 10:23 AM
kimebear's Avatar
kimebear kimebear is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Albany, United States
Posts: 842
Default

Well, if no one else wants the Danish emerald parure, I'll happily take it anytime!
__________________
I am a leaf on the wind, watch how I soar.
Reply With Quote
  #205  
Old 04-04-2008, 10:35 AM
Lilla's Avatar
Lilla Lilla is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 492
Default

I can't figure out what the danish emerald parure is doing on a thread called "Worst Royal Jewels". To me this parure is incredible beautifull
Reply With Quote
  #206  
Old 04-04-2008, 12:46 PM
Thomas Parkman's Avatar
Thomas Parkman Thomas Parkman is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Columbia, United States
Posts: 497
Default

I could not agree with you more. The only reason I can think of is that we have yet another opportunity to drool and pant over such a marvelous concoction. of course there are no pictures that can do justice to any jewels of this quality.

BTW all of you who have disparaged the Burma ruby tiara need to go to picture of QEII at the banquet with President Sarkozy. The contraption is simply incredible. Unfortunately, being the computer mongoloid I do not know how to quote that citation here. But the whole ensemble is magnificent beyond words. I was sitting there drooling and eating every negative word I have ever said about it. I sat there thinking, well the Noble Warren has struck again.

You know good people, we really should form a Warren admiration society and send him lots of chocolate so that we can ruin and corrupt him. He does have a way of digging up the most wondrous goodies. And probably has the most gigantic storage barns in Australia for all the goodies he keeps hidden away. cheeers.
Reply With Quote
  #207  
Old 04-04-2008, 01:10 PM
jcbcode99's Avatar
jcbcode99 jcbcode99 is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Richmond Area, United States
Posts: 1,319
Default

Thomas, here is the link to the post Warren made with the photo--
http://www.theroyalforums.com/forums/746639-post24.html

Now, I have to take a moment and comment about the Burmese. I think that there are times when the piece looks darn good--but more often than not, I find it unattractive. Not the stones, never the stones! But, the composition of the piece. It is supposed to be a rose in full bloom but it looks somewhat "flat" to me. I also think that the "swirls" or whatever look they have stuff shooting up from it--I've heard it described as antenna--and I agree. All in all, the piece just doesn't have any form--and by form I mean movement or continuity. It's just stones on a frame. The IDEA of the piece was beautiful, the drawing that the jewelers did before they actually made the piece is stunning--but the final piece just falls flat. I can only hope that the Hyderabad tiara wasn't sacrificed for this thing. I think it is just one of those pieces you have to see to appreciate.
In this pic, it looks nice:
http://www.theroyalforums.com/forums/747630-post29.html
__________________
Janet

"We make a living by what we do; we make a life by what we give" Winston Churchill
Reply With Quote
  #208  
Old 04-04-2008, 04:52 PM
PrinceOfCanada's Avatar
PrinceOfCanada PrinceOfCanada is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 360
Default

Hmm.. I don't think the Burmese belongs in here. It's not a spectacular piece of jewellery, and certainly pales in comparison to the Vladimir (probably my favourite) for example. Then again, pretty much anything pales in comparison.
Reply With Quote
  #209  
Old 04-04-2008, 09:42 PM
jcbcode99's Avatar
jcbcode99 jcbcode99 is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Richmond Area, United States
Posts: 1,319
Default

The Vladimir is my favorite as well--with the emeralds. A stunning piece of workmanship--and yes, anything would pale in comparison. But, like you Princeof Canada, I do think the Burmese does not belong here--it won't make the favorites thread because of the design (well, maybe it would, but not a post of mine!) but it certainly isn't the worse of the worse. Those honors go to the Golden Poppies and the Brazillian Aquamarine nightmare. Although you can't see me, I just want everyone to know I just shuddered thinking about the two pieces.
__________________
Janet

"We make a living by what we do; we make a life by what we give" Winston Churchill
Reply With Quote
  #210  
Old 04-04-2008, 10:17 PM
Madame Royale's Avatar
Madame Royale Madame Royale is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,886
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lilla View Post
I can't figure out what the danish emerald parure is doing on a thread called "Worst Royal Jewels". To me this parure is incredible beautifull
It's one of the loveliest parure's left in royal Europe...
__________________
Fashions fade - style is eternal
YSL
Reply With Quote
  #211  
Old 04-05-2008, 10:16 AM
jcbcode99's Avatar
jcbcode99 jcbcode99 is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Richmond Area, United States
Posts: 1,319
Default

I completely agree. It looks heavy by itself but on it looks very delicate and graceful. It reminds me of CP Mary's ruby parue--are they by the same maker perchance?
__________________
Janet

"We make a living by what we do; we make a life by what we give" Winston Churchill
Reply With Quote
  #212  
Old 04-05-2008, 12:30 PM
Stefan's Avatar
Stefan Stefan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Esslingen, Germany
Posts: 614
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcbcode99 View Post
I completely agree. It looks heavy by itself but on it looks very delicate and graceful. It reminds me of CP Mary's ruby parue--are they by the same maker perchance?
Don't think so. They ruby parure was made early in the 19th century in France as it was bought by Jean Baptiste Nernadotte for his wife Desiree to wear it at the coronation of Napoleon I. in 1804. Amd accoding to Bjarne's book on the danish Royal Jewels there was no tiara at all, only a few hair combs. The emerald parure was made in 1840 by C.M. Weisshaupt & Sons.
__________________
Stefan


Royal Travel and Events

Reply With Quote
  #213  
Old 04-05-2008, 12:51 PM
Thomas Parkman's Avatar
Thomas Parkman Thomas Parkman is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Columbia, United States
Posts: 497
Default

Again the design of the aquamarine tiara of QEII is the problem. The gemstones themselves are magnificent. I think the earlier version of it was certainly more attractive. Whoever did the current one must have been drunk when he did it. The two worst are the Wurtemburg horror and the Poppies gone beserk "tiara" of QMII which for the sheer ugliness of it is in a class almost by itself. But the cough drop thingie of QSonaya certainly gives it a run for the money. Perhaps, for sheer silliness, the nine most frequent contributors to this thread should each submit a picture of him or herself wearing one of the poppies in the hair, on the nose, as a tie pin or a brooch just to see something that you would give anything to forget but cannot.

My favorites, since we are insisting on dragging everything into a jewel besotted mud here is the Fife and the Bagration tiaras. Fabulous beyond words. Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #214  
Old 04-05-2008, 02:23 PM
jcbcode99's Avatar
jcbcode99 jcbcode99 is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Richmond Area, United States
Posts: 1,319
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stefan View Post
Don't think so. They ruby parure was made early in the 19th century in France as it was bought by Jean Baptiste Nernadotte for his wife Desiree to wear it at the coronation of Napoleon I. in 1804. Amd accoding to Bjarne's book on the danish Royal Jewels there was no tiara at all, only a few hair combs. The emerald parure was made in 1840 by C.M. Weisshaupt & Sons.
Stefan, thank you for the information! I wonder does Bjarne's book have an English translation? He is a wealth of knowledge over at the RJOTW board.
__________________
Janet

"We make a living by what we do; we make a life by what we give" Winston Churchill
Reply With Quote
  #215  
Old 04-05-2008, 03:40 PM
Stefan's Avatar
Stefan Stefan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Esslingen, Germany
Posts: 614
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcbcode99 View Post
Stefan, thank you for the information! I wonder does Bjarne's book have an English translation? He is a wealth of knowledge over at the RJOTW board.
NO unfortunately not. He said he will try to make a new book in english once, but a different one where also Mary will be incldued and how ingrid's jewels were divided after her death.
__________________
Stefan


Royal Travel and Events

Reply With Quote
  #216  
Old 04-05-2008, 06:03 PM
PrinceOfCanada's Avatar
PrinceOfCanada PrinceOfCanada is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 360
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcbcode99 View Post
Those honors go to the Golden Poppies and the Brazillian Aquamarine nightmare. Although you can't see me, I just want everyone to know I just shuddered thinking about the two pieces.
I'll agree with you on the Golden Poppies. The only excuse I can come up with for that horror is that I choose to believe she had it made in the 60's, and everyone was on drugs.

But the Brazilian Aquamarine is underrated, I think. It's just that with pieces that huge, you need to be a fairly big person (taller, mostly) to pull it off, and you can't burden yourself with any other bling.
Reply With Quote
  #217  
Old 04-05-2008, 06:21 PM
PrinceOfCanada's Avatar
PrinceOfCanada PrinceOfCanada is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 360
Default

Okay, I thilnk I've just found a couple of EIIR nightmares..

Royal Collection - Dress for the Occasion What the hell were they thinking?

And this.. words fail me. I thought the Queen Mum had taste? Maybe it was George who picked it out.. Royal Collection - Dress for the Occasion
Reply With Quote
  #218  
Old 04-05-2008, 06:39 PM
jcbcode99's Avatar
jcbcode99 jcbcode99 is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Richmond Area, United States
Posts: 1,319
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PrinceOfCanada View Post
Okay, I thilnk I've just found a couple of EIIR nightmares..

Royal Collection - Dress for the Occasion What the hell were they thinking?

And this.. words fail me. I thought the Queen Mum had taste? Maybe it was George who picked it out.. Royal Collection - Dress for the Occasion

I have to agree about that brooch of the Queen Mum's--the art deco piece. I read somewhere it's supposed to be a leaf, but other than the general outline, I just don't get it. I am not a fan of it at all.
But, the flower basket brooch--call me old-fashioned, but I really do like it. There is another one, seen in Field's book, of similiar design with some large diamonds composing the basket and I like it better. I need to find a picture so I can show you!
__________________
Janet

"We make a living by what we do; we make a life by what we give" Winston Churchill
Reply With Quote
  #219  
Old 04-05-2008, 07:30 PM
vee's Avatar
vee vee is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Atlanta, United States
Posts: 7
Default

I never thought I'd say that ANY jewelry could be hideous . . .

Well, so much for THAT!

This thread has some of the UGLIEST pieces of jewelry I have ever seen in my life!
Reply With Quote