The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #21  
Old 04-04-2008, 06:03 AM
MARG's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 7,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by candygirl_68 View Post
i might be difficult, but IMO the jewels belong back to India...
Why? They were gifts of no "official" significance to India.
__________________

__________________
MARG
"Words ought to be a little wild, for they are assaults of thoughts on the unthinking." - JM Keynes
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-06-2008, 02:54 PM
candygirl_68's Avatar
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: -, France
Posts: 236
was just my opinion... Britain has enough jewels...
__________________

__________________
If you have much, give of your wealth; If you have little, give of your heart-arab proverb
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-06-2008, 04:21 PM
Thomas Parkman's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Columbia, United States
Posts: 531
No, no, dear Lady, Britain does not have enough jewels. Nobody, even Imperial Russia, had enough jewels. The more jewels the merrier. Besides a major complaint, albeit a trivial one, is that Queen Elizabeth wears only a small number of the tiaras and other wondrous and toothsome objects in her most royal possession and leaves other delights just shut away in the cold, dark, dank and dreary vaults which are supposedly under Buckingham Palace. If some kind soul would send me the directions I would fly over to Londan and rent a room on the ground floor near the Palace and buy a shovel on the order of the Red Haired League of Conan Doyle and dig away. After all what she does not use she could not possibly miss. And I could then post pictures of these unloved goodies on the RF. But nobody ever has enough jewels. And diamonds are everybody's best friend. Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-29-2008, 06:29 PM
Prince of Chota's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Neuilly, France
Posts: 514
Art treasures, and similarly jewels, are some of the best ambassadors a country has. The Anglo-Indian jewels were GIVEN to the British royal family, and accordingly there is no need to return them. Besides, at least someone is wearing them. If they were returned, they'd just be gathering dust in some Delhi museum, like the Napoleonic jewels in the Smithsonian in the United States.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-08-2008, 03:08 AM
Newbie
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: FLUSHING, United States
Posts: 1
Stolen Jewels

It is sad that I have to say this, but I would think that it should have been understood and done long time ago! Most of the British and Persian Jewels are stolen diamonds and goods from india and its temples (for ex: Darya-e-noor, kohinoor, the hope diamond, etc), I and many indians personally feel that it should be returned. < ed Warren >
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-18-2012, 01:28 AM
Josefine's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: , Sweden
Posts: 9,518
i am gussing that princess christina of sweden jewllery theft can include in this thread.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-31-2012, 10:38 AM
Gentry
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: different, Sweden
Posts: 84
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cissan View Post
There was an argument between the Swedish king and his uncle Prince Sigvard regarding a ruby tiara that Sigvard felt belonged to him.
This is how I have understood the conflict. Sigvard needed money when he married and lost his title and sold most of the jewels he had inherited from his mother. The diadem however he pawned by his father in hope that he later would be able to pay back the loan. The king understood it as if he had bought the tiara but he let his son borrow it sometimes for his wife to wear. When the king died he left the tiara to Sigvard's son who later soled it to king Carl Gustav. Sigvard thought the transaction was wrong since he and not his son was the owner of the diadem.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-19-2016, 08:59 PM
CyrilVladisla's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Conneaut, United States
Posts: 4,282
In Matriarch, Anne Edwards wrote: The Queen had heard through a Lady-in-Waiting that for Christmas he (Edward) had given Mrs. Simpson jewels valued at over 50,000 pounds, including several pieces that had been in the Royal Family for generations.

This Christmas was in 1935. Is this true that Prince Edward gave Wallis any Royal Jewels?
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 04-16-2018, 06:49 AM
Queen Claude's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: USA, United States
Posts: 865
Quote:
Originally Posted by CyrilVladisla View Post
In Matriarch, Anne Edwards wrote: The Queen had heard through a Lady-in-Waiting that for Christmas he (Edward) had given Mrs. Simpson jewels valued at over 50,000 pounds, including several pieces that had been in the Royal Family for generations.

This Christmas was in 1935. Is this true that Prince Edward gave Wallis any Royal Jewels?
Maybe someone told Queen Mary this back in the 1930s but history has not borne this out. Edward did lavish Wallis with jewels both before and after the abdication, but he purchased them from jewelers. If he gave her any jewels from the royal vaults, and I recall reading something like that, IMO it was not several and I doubt if the jewels went back generations. A possibility is that Edward was gifted jewels on one of his tours and those jewels were incorporated into gifts for Wallis.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 04-16-2018, 06:56 AM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,064
What about loose stones that had been deposited in the vaults, jewels like diamonds from various tours made by past Kings, loose gemstones, pearls, presented to Queen Victoria and so on?
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 04-16-2018, 07:36 AM
Duc_et_Pair's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Netherlands
Posts: 8,468
From what I can see in pictures of the Duchess of Windsor with jewels, it are all contemporary pieces by contemporary firms. The Duchess had an avantgardistic taste in jewels which is hardly detectable in the current British collection.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 04-16-2018, 08:42 AM
Queen Claude's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: USA, United States
Posts: 865
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curryong View Post
What about loose stones that had been deposited in the vaults, jewels like diamonds from various tours made by past Kings, loose gemstones, pearls, presented to Queen Victoria and so on?
I think that it is possible that he could have nicked a loose stone or two, but just not to the order of magnitude being described. I don't think that Edward could have raided the coffers prior to becoming King, come on can you really imagine Mary of Teck allowing that! The story that someone told Queen Mary may have been true, but I doubt if Edward VIII actually had the access to the jewels in order to commit the offense.

Also if the Duchess had pieces that had Victorian or other connections, I think that would have come out, her jewels often had their own biographies.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 04-16-2018, 08:44 AM
Commoner
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Stamford, United States
Posts: 40
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas Parkman View Post
No, no, dear Lady, Britain does not have enough jewels. Nobody, even Imperial Russia, had enough jewels. The more jewels the merrier. Besides a major complaint, albeit a trivial one, is that Queen Elizabeth wears only a small number of the tiaras and other wondrous and toothsome objects in her most royal possession and leaves other delights just shut away in the cold, dark, dank and dreary vaults which are supposedly under Buckingham Palace. If some kind soul would send me the directions I would fly over to Londan and rent a room on the ground floor near the Palace and buy a shovel on the order of the Red Haired League of Conan Doyle and dig away. After all what she does not use she could not possibly miss. And I could then post pictures of these unloved goodies on the RF. But nobody ever has enough jewels. And diamonds are everybody's best friend. Cheers.
Agreed! Well said.
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
disputes, jewellery, lawsuits, theft


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Royal Jewellery & Fine Arts Auctions and Exhibitions kimebear Royal Jewels General Discussion 268 10-07-2018 10:41 AM
Queen Beatrix Jewellery Josefine Royal Jewels 229 09-29-2018 09:00 PM
Queen Elizabeth II Jewellery 1: April 2004-August 2005 Alexandria Royal Jewels 132 08-18-2005 02:13 PM




Popular Tags
"chinese gordon" australia belgian bonaparte british royal family camilla charles china christian ix clothes current events daughter de belgique duchess of cornwall duchess of sussex duchess of york duke of sussex duke of york extramarital affairs fashion felipe and letizia germany grandchild harry and meghan interesting facts introduction jacobite juan carlos king king felipe king willem-alexander meghan markle modernization monaco northampton osborn patronages piromallo plantagenets porphyria prince prince charles prince daniel prince harry prince harry of wales princess beatrice princess eugenie princess louise prince william public opinion pyrmont royal royal ancestry royal ancestry; oscar and sophia royal family royal geneology royal wedding sarah ferguson soldier spain state visit sweden the crown titles uk styles tom bower tony armstrong-jones waldeck wedding windsor castle working visit



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:58 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2018
Jelsoft Enterprises