 |
|

03-25-2011, 12:24 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Burbank, United States
Posts: 6,408
|
|
__________________
Chewsteraghi on Tumblr. Schmichaelira on Twitter. Tumblr aka obsessivechewsteraghidisorder. Be warned: I'm weird.
|

03-25-2011, 12:27 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Brussels, Belgium
Posts: 1,636
|
|
|
The Bishop of Monaco started the funerals by saying "Monseigneur, Altesses Sérénissimes", or Caroline and her daughter Alexandra are Altesses royales?
|

03-25-2011, 12:30 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sassenage, France
Posts: 1,354
|
|
|
I think he forgot the fact princess Caroline and Alexandra are Altesses Royales.
|

03-25-2011, 12:33 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 2,997
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wa3kittiees
Fornication -- sex between an unmarried man and unmarried woman -- is not a mortal sin.
Every priest that I have known would not deny someone the Eucharist if someone stepped forward to receive the Eucharist.
No priest would make a spectle out of denying anyone the Eucharist at a mass.
The sacraments, including the Eucharist, are to be comforts to those who believe.
Denying someone the Eucharist at a funeral mass does not follow that element of Roman Catholic doctrine.
Personally, I don't like the heavy black, including the veils. I find it overboard -- more worried about the look than the grief.
Personally, I never wear complete black to a funeral.
I wore black slacks & a pistachio sweater to my sister's funeral and I wore a navy blue skirt & a brightly striped sweater to my father's funeral.
(both were Roman Catholic masses)
I am sorry for this loss to all the family and the people of Monaco.
|
What??! When did THAT change and why was I not informed ?! Think of all the fun I missed out on! Wait till I tell my confessor...take THAT father!
|

03-25-2011, 02:07 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Brussels, Belgium
Posts: 1,636
|
|
|
What has this to do with HSH the late Princess Antoinette 's funerals ?
|

03-25-2011, 02:41 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: in a corner of ..., Argentina
Posts: 2,687
|
|
|
^It's all about why Charlene and Caroline can take communion or not, it went a little bit off-topic.
I would like to know why the De Massys had to be behind Caroline and Stephanie, who had to be behind Albert and Charlene.
I know, if it's protocol....but still doesn't seem right. At least, Albert could be in front with Cecile and Charlene behind with some other De Massy.
Charlene shouldn't be in front...yet. She is the fiancee, not the wife (yet).
__________________
* * The eyes are the mirror of the soul* *
The Impossible is what the mind can not imagine ...
|

03-25-2011, 02:45 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 2,997
|
|
|
Nathalie Cox, I was a bit surprised to see CW up front with PA as well. I thought she couldn't do that until after the wedding?
Ah well...shows you how much I know about protocol!
|

03-25-2011, 02:48 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: in a corner of ..., Argentina
Posts: 2,687
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moonmaiden23
Nathalie Cox, I was a bit surprised to see CW up front with PA as well. I thought she couldn't do that until after the wedding?
Ah well...shows you how much I know about protocol!
|
Yeah! Well, i don't know about protocol either. I "blame" protocol for it, but i don't really know
__________________
* * The eyes are the mirror of the soul* *
The Impossible is what the mind can not imagine ...
|

03-25-2011, 04:55 PM
|
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: snowsville, Canada
Posts: 385
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceflower
|
Question. why is alexandra, at least I think it is her, wearing a white lace veil and not black?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bones
Yes, but far as I know she's still living with Alex ... and I doubt they're sleeping in twin beds
And someone better tell the Charlene thread that she didn't take communion so it looks like she's Protestant again (sigh), of course neither did Caroline which surprised me.
|
Who said you had to be free of sin to recieve communion? I don't think anyone would take communion, not alone Charlotte, if they did.
Charlene is protestant again? Did she convert to catholocism and then back again? I think you mean protestant still.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wa3kittiees
Fornication -- sex between an unmarried man and unmarried woman -- is not a mortal sin.
Every priest that I have known would not deny someone the Eucharist if someone stepped forward to receive the Eucharist.
No priest would make a spectle out of denying anyone the Eucharist at a mass.
The sacraments, including the Eucharist, are to be comforts to those who believe.
Denying someone the Eucharist at a funeral mass does not follow that element of Roman Catholic doctrine.
Personally, I don't like the heavy black, including the veils. I find it overboard -- more worried about the look than the grief.
Personally, I never wear complete black to a funeral.
I wore black slacks & a pistachio sweater to my sister's funeral and I wore a navy blue skirt & a brightly striped sweater to my father's funeral.
(both were Roman Catholic masses)
I am sorry for this loss to all the family and the people of Monaco.
|
In old catholic countries, and countries which are very Catholic, it is tradition to wear the veils. you will even find it in Latin American countries. It is a sign of respect. Women used to not wear their heads uncovered, hence the hoods they wore in the Tudor times, or veils in other eras. During mourning they would wear only black for months, including their veils. Some countries like Monaco and such have continued with this tradition. It reflects the highly catholoc origins of the country.
|

03-25-2011, 05:08 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: KittyLand Junction, United States
Posts: 2,595
|
|
|
If Charlotte has confessed her sins, she would have been admonished to "go and sin no more." Perhaps she's unwilling to sin no more and thereby won't take communion.
|

03-25-2011, 05:11 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 2,997
|
|
KittyAtlanta...you think of EVERYTHING!
It's true...you only need to be free of mortal sin to receive the Eucharist...otherwise no one would!
|

03-25-2011, 06:28 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Brussels, Belgium
Posts: 1,636
|
|
|
I followed the whole official funerals in the Catholic Cathedral of Monaco. She was a Member of the House of Grimaldi, it was normal that the Prince Souverain and his close family were the "highlight". He had on his right side the most important women of Monaco for the moment , Princess Caroline and on his left side his fiancee.
The Bishop started with Monseigneur , Altesses Sérénismes , Excellences , Mesdames et Messieurs. The whole Funerals were official with the Prayer for the Prince Souverain and Deo Juventus. Before the coffin was Princess Antoinette's decoration the highest Order of Monaco (St Charles).
I am sure that later in the small Chapel , the de Massy family were before the Grimaldis .
Princess Antoinette 's official funerals took about nearly 2 hours and what the Priests said about her was respectfully and the Journalist from Monaco did great work.
|

03-25-2011, 06:34 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 2,997
|
|
Thank you maria-olivia...that was great information!
So both CW and Princess Caroline had a place of honour, and everybody is happy now?
|

03-25-2011, 06:57 PM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Taupo, New Zealand
Posts: 256
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wa3kittiees
Fornication -- sex between an unmarried man and unmarried woman -- is not a mortal sin.
Every priest that I have known would not deny someone the Eucharist if someone stepped forward to receive the Eucharist.
No priest would make a spectle out of denying anyone the Eucharist at a mass.
The sacraments, including the Eucharist, are to be comforts to those who believe.
Denying someone the Eucharist at a funeral mass does not follow that element of Roman Catholic doctrine.
Personally, I don't like the heavy black, including the veils. I find it overboard -- more worried about the look than the grief.
Personally, I never wear complete black to a funeral.
I wore black slacks & a pistachio sweater to my sister's funeral and I wore a navy blue skirt & a brightly striped sweater to my father's funeral.
(both were Roman Catholic masses)
I am sorry for this loss to all the family and the people of Monaco.
|
wa3kittiees....I embrace your comments  .....I am also a catholic and my husband is not...but we got married in the Church 2 years ago and our Priest bent over backwards to make my husband feel at ease, and afterwards my husband said he was so pleased we married in the Church...I know this digressing a bit but the Catholic Church has come along way in its thinking to try and fit within the 21st century....it may have along way to go but it is trying.
__________________
Anything in Moderation
|

03-25-2011, 08:14 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Burbank, United States
Posts: 6,408
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathalie Cox
^It's all about why Charlene and Caroline can take communion or not, it went a little bit off-topic.
I would like to know why the De Massys had to be behind Caroline and Stephanie, who had to be behind Albert and Charlene.
I know, if it's protocol....but still doesn't seem right. At least, Albert could be in front with Cecile and Charlene behind with some other De Massy.
Charlene shouldn't be in front...yet. She is the fiancee, not the wife (yet).
|
In other countries besides Monaco (and maybe in Monaco too) if you are engaged to marry, the protocol treats you as a married couple. But I agree with you that the direct descendents of the deceased should have more precedence in the funeral procession.
On other issues....
I'm sorry to see on this thread so much outrage and upset over "sin" and communion. I'm also sorry to see one poster tell another poster not to judge (about communion and sins), all the while stating something very judgmental about CW. A person who judges condemns another for judging. Take a look @ yourself before you cast stones.
__________________
Chewsteraghi on Tumblr. Schmichaelira on Twitter. Tumblr aka obsessivechewsteraghidisorder. Be warned: I'm weird.
|

03-25-2011, 08:42 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Lisboa, Portugal
Posts: 1,005
|
|
|
|

03-25-2011, 09:49 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere in, United States
Posts: 9,839
|
|
|
Please note that I have deleted a couple of off topic posts about the Charlene vs. Caroline comparison, scandals in the Catholic Church and personal attacks on Charlene as well as other members.
This is a funeral thread, its a shame that people can't act accordingly.
If this continues this thread will be closed permanently.
|

03-27-2011, 01:14 AM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: côte d'océan Pacifique, United States
Posts: 594
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathalie Cox
^It's all about why Charlene and Caroline can take communion or not, it went a little bit off-topic.
I would like to know why the De Massys had to be behind Caroline and Stephanie, who had to be behind Albert and Charlene.
I know, if it's protocol....but still doesn't seem right. At least, Albert could be in front with Cecile and Charlene behind with some other De Massy.
Charlene shouldn't be in front...yet. She is the fiancee, not the wife (yet).
|
I noticed that too. The De Massys were steps behind the princely family. Protocol is important but looks odd sometimes. Very antiquated.
|

03-27-2011, 07:57 AM
|
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,500
|
|
|
Precedence is important for royals, princes and other nobility, and for their people who like to see their ruling family behave according to protocol, especially at funerals, weddings, and the like.
|

03-27-2011, 09:27 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Burbank, United States
Posts: 6,408
|
|
Charlene actually appeared to be very... genuinely sad, IMO. I can't see her being close to Antoinette, not really, but the old lady was probably quite nice to her. I bet Princess Antoinette was quite nice, as she aged. She could be a feisty little (Tiny, lol) Tiger Blooded B---h but then she aged into a nice funny grandmother. And the poor thing suffered a lot of loss. Her own daughter.  And husband John Gilpin. I know everyone suffers these kind of losses, but it doesn't make it any less tragic. Life is tough, and Antoinette was a trooper through it all. Now all of that old Grimaldi generation are gone. Long live the Prince.
__________________
Chewsteraghi on Tumblr. Schmichaelira on Twitter. Tumblr aka obsessivechewsteraghidisorder. Be warned: I'm weird.
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Links |
|
|
|