The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #101  
Old 09-24-2005, 11:45 PM
lamass's Avatar
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: jonesboro, United States
Posts: 184
suturegeisha, that is an amazing point of view lindy had. how strange is it all of those things are happening in a row with this pregnancy.
__________________

__________________
  #102  
Old 09-24-2005, 11:49 PM
Commoner
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Orlando, United States
Posts: 27
Well I have no real worries about the whole thing. For one Louis is royalty. He probably has some enourmous trust fund set up so his child will be set for life. I'm sure there will be some emotional baggage but Louis's child will get everything he needs.

I'm sure Louis's parents aren't happy though. No matter who your parents are they are initially going to hit the roof if their teenaged son or daughter announces to them that they are pregnant. Can you imagien how that must have affected the Grand Duke and Duchess to learn their son was expecting an illegitamate child? I would have been a little less than pleased. So I doubt Lousis' parents are thrilled.
__________________

__________________
  #103  
Old 09-25-2005, 01:33 AM
Warren's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15,427
Titles

Quote:
Originally Posted by gaggleofcrazypeople
Since Jean's children are all counts and countesses, I believe the baby will have a similar title.
Late last year Grand Duke Henri granted Jean and his four children the title of Prince (and Princess) of Nassau with the qualification of Royal Highness. Prior to this they were Counts and Countesses of Nassau.

If Louis doesn't marry the mother of the child I think it unlikely he or she will be given a title. But historically the Luxembourg House seems to enjoy giving out titles to the dispossessed, so who knows?
.
__________________
  #104  
Old 09-25-2005, 01:47 AM
Gentry
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: -, Australia
Posts: 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by Genevieve
I am of mixed feelings on this subject.
Bravo Genevieve!

This message board is truly surprising. Okay, to be honest, most of the time, we ogle at royalty or say silly things at one point or another, but this topic really has brought out a lot of interesting discussion!

I agree with Genevieve about the part of the pregnancy announcement being a bit of a PR thing. I'm sure they were not thrilled in the same way the queens and kings of other countries were happy with their impending daughters' pregnancies.

Also, I did notice (as someone pointed out already), in hindsight it's easy to see that there were no new pictures of the family over the past few months. And as someone said before, it would have been interesting to have been a fly on the wall when Louis told his family about the news.
.
__________________
  #105  
Old 09-25-2005, 04:50 AM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: N/A, France
Posts: 1,683
Quote:
Originally Posted by gaggleofcrazypeople
Since Jean's children are all counts and countesses, I believe the baby will have a similar title.
GD Henri has decided they would be princes. So now they are princes.
__________________
  #106  
Old 09-25-2005, 04:55 AM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: N/A, France
Posts: 1,683
I think no one here can be sure at 100% how strict or relax parents Henri and Maria Teresa are. As for the whole royalty, we can only assume things and make deductions when seeing pictures, except if we have contacts with the royal families. So saying "Henri and MT haven't been strict enough parents" is going to far, as would be the fact of saying the contrary.
__________________
  #107  
Old 09-25-2005, 01:25 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago, United States
Posts: 1,538
Since he thought he was so smart and adult for having unprotected intercourse, I would then cut him off financially and make him really learn what being a parent is all about. Paying for the baby's health care, clothing, diapers, food, etc.

Let's see how adult he would be without the money and homes to back up his careless actions.

I will say it again, amazing how all of you treat this like it is so cool to have happened.

If he was not rich and royal, the baby would be the one to suffer and miss out as is usually the case when parents are that young.
__________________
  #108  
Old 09-25-2005, 01:37 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Wichita, United States
Posts: 335
Personally, I'm downright sick and tired of the rude, nasty, and appallingly judgemental comments people have been making about this situation. There seems to be alot of negativity all over this forum (not just in this thread) from certain people as of late, and it's getting to the point where I don't really care to visit anymore.
__________________
  #109  
Old 09-25-2005, 01:43 PM
Harry's polo shirt's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: my paradise, United States
Posts: 2,091
Hi, Lady Marmalade!

I think his parents need to be careful in order to not punish the baby. YOu can punish the parents but sometimes that punishment hurts the baby. I know Louis is 19, the same age as me. He is probably freaking out and extremely stressed out right now, if his parents cut him off or are mean to him, that may cause him to ignore his parents. Grandparents are very important to a child.

His parents definatly should not enable him or anything. Giving him a free ride with money, a house, etc. will hurt him more. He should learn from his actions, (I will not call it a mistake because no child should ever be called a mistake).

Most parents have no idea what their children are doing. They may have given him some space and freedom, and he took advantage of it. His parents should not be held responsible they had nothing to do with him making a baby.
__________________
"The pain of spending a week with my brother is well worth it."
– Prince William, on joining Prince Harry for a charity motorcycle ride across South Africa

  #110  
Old 09-25-2005, 01:49 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago, United States
Posts: 1,538
I agree, do not punish the poor baby as all babies need the unconditional love, which hopefully he and his girlfriend will give the child.

Look, I am going to assume none us know the prince or his girlfriend personally. Therefore we do not know the circumstances other than the fact she is pregnant by him.

And we can mix the happy posting of congrats with the ones of disgust as well. It is called freedom of expression as we all have different views of this situation.

I just believe what he did was careless and reckless. I know it seems maybe a chic thing to do when you have money and homes and servants to back it up.

And since he was so adult to have intercourse without protection, then he should be responsible, get a job and support the child without the palaces, trust funds and titles to back him up.

Reality is a wet diaper and a screaming baby nine months later.
__________________
  #111  
Old 09-25-2005, 02:55 PM
Princejohnny25's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: , Antarctica
Posts: 2,033
You guys act like he is the first royal to have a child outside of wedlock. It is much better that the whole family help raise this child. Louis is not the first royal in history to have a bastard child. He is doing the right think by announcing it and being a proper father to the child. He could have easily paid his girlfriend to stay quite and set up trust funds and never see the child like other royals do but he is being responsible.
__________________
  #112  
Old 09-25-2005, 03:01 PM
BMC's Avatar
BMC BMC is offline
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 206
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lady Marmalade
I agree, do not punish the poor baby as all babies need the unconditional love, which hopefully he and his girlfriend will give the child.

Look, I am going to assume none us know the prince or his girlfriend personally. Therefore we do not know the circumstances other than the fact she is pregnant by him.

And we can mix the happy posting of congrats with the ones of disgust as well. It is called freedom of expression as we all have different views of this situation.

I just believe what he did was careless and reckless. I know it seems maybe a chic thing to do when you have money and homes and servants to back it up.

And since he was so adult to have intercourse without protection, then he should be responsible, get a job and support the child without the palaces, trust funds and titles to back him up.

Reality is a wet diaper and a screaming baby nine months later.
Hear, hear!

No matter how this works out, this child is going to have a deeper impact on Tessy Antony's life than on Prince Louis'- if things do not work out between them, Louis will leave and go on with his life. Miss Antony however will still have the child to raise- yes, it will be much easier with the financial support of the Grand Ducal family but still, she will be the one to do it on her own.
Then again, she may be far more prepared to handle it than he is- she comes from an ordinary family- no trust funds, homes or servants/flunkies to clean up your messes for you.

Anyway, I'm curious about the reaction in Luxembourg to this news. What do the people there think about all of this?
__________________
  #113  
Old 09-25-2005, 03:25 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: newyork, United States
Posts: 479
I don't think it's fair to assume it was unprotected sex. Things happen and birth control can fail. It happens to 19 year olds as well as 40 year olds. I wish them luck being a parent isn't an easy job I don't care how old you are.
__________________
  #114  
Old 09-25-2005, 03:34 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 705
Quote:
Originally Posted by delineate
Personally, I'm downright sick and tired of the rude, nasty, and appallingly judgemental comments people have been making about this situation. There seems to be alot of negativity all over this forum (not just in this thread) from certain people as of late, and it's getting to the point where I don't really care to visit anymore.
I don't think it says anywhere that this forum has to be always sugary and chipper and that posts can't be constructive or critical.

This is a controversial topic on many levels. On the one hand you have teenage parents to be who are not married, sex before marriage, traditional ideals of monarchy and sensitivities to scandal, and a host of other issues and subjects. There are bound to be lots of different opinons. Some will be supportive and encouraging of the situation, others critical and negative, and some like me who are in between and don't know what to think.

Not everyone likes the Luxembourg royals, and even if one does, they aren't always going to agree with the actions of members of the royal family all the time.

In any thread you read here some level of judgement is being passed, whether it's on what someone is wearing or how their hair is cut or on actions of a much deeper level, such as Louis's actions in light of this announcement.

Isn't this post I am quoting passing judgement on those who've shared their critical opinons?
__________________
  #115  
Old 09-25-2005, 03:40 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 705
Quote:
Originally Posted by iowabelle
Genevieve, it's not the worst thing that could have happened. I mean, they didn't raise a criminal, after all.

And besides, nobody (well, except me) really talks about Princess Caroline of Monaco having two children conceived illegitimately anymore. (Granted, she married their fathers later.) Nobody said her parents were lax with her (or with Albert). Stephanie, maybe that's a case of lax parenting... but oh well. Monaco has survived so far.

This family will probably do just fine in the future.
Monaco's monarchy may have survived thus far but they are a bit of a joke and hardly respected as some other monarchies. Especially with Ranier gone, there is hardly a member of that family that is a true class act anymore. All three children have had children out of wedlock (though a different case can be made for Caroline as she did wed Stefano and Ernst August before the babies were actually born). Both Caroline and Stephanie have had affairs that resulted in broken marriage for their boyfriend's, multiple weddings and anulments.

When you think of the circus that is the Grimaldi family's monarchy, you can hardly take them seriously when you think of the Spanish or the Belgian royals.

In Great Britain Queen Elizabeth is very well respected as a monarch but when Charles takes over he'll have an uphill battle in gaining the public's respect for all his shenanigans over the years.

In the case of the Luxembourg royal family, it's a good thing that it's Guillaume who will succeed his father and not Louis.
__________________
  #116  
Old 09-25-2005, 04:38 PM
Lady Jennifer's Avatar
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Down the street. It's the third house on the right, United States
Posts: 7,671
Post

Or it could be the other way around. Prince Louis might step up & take care of the child & Miss Antony could leave and go on with her life. It could happen that way but I'm not Saying it will. With ppl now knowing about the child Prince Louis will have to (even if he doesn't want too) take care of the child. The ppl of Luxembourg will not stand for a deadbeat dad who is a Prince (my own opinion of course.).

Quote:
Originally Posted by BMC
Hear, hear!

No matter how this works out, this child is going to have a deeper impact on Tessy Antony's life than on Prince Louis'- if things do not work out between them, Louis will leave and go on with his life. Miss Antony however will still have the child to raise- yes, it will be much easier with the financial support of the Grand Ducal family but still, she will be the one to do it on her own.
Then again, she may be far more prepared to handle it than he is- she comes from an ordinary family- no trust funds, homes or servants/flunkies to clean up your messes for you.

Anyway, I'm curious about the reaction in Luxembourg to this news. What do the people there think about all of this?
__________________
"Life is a succession of moments. To live each one is to succeed." - Corita Kent
Live, Highlander. Grow stronger. Fight another day. Highlander: The Series

  #117  
Old 09-25-2005, 04:41 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago, United States
Posts: 1,538
Quote:
Originally Posted by Genevieve
I don't think it says anywhere that this forum has to be always sugary and chipper and that posts can't be constructive or critical.

This is a controversial topic on many levels. On the one hand you have teenage parents to be who are not married, sex before marriage, traditional ideals of monarchy and sensitivities to scandal, and a host of other issues and subjects. There are bound to be lots of different opinons. Some will be supportive and encouraging of the situation, others critical and negative, and some like me who are in between and don't know what to think.

Not everyone likes the Luxembourg royals, and even if one does, they aren't always going to agree with the actions of members of the royal family all the time.

In any thread you read here some level of judgement is being passed, whether it's on what someone is wearing or how their hair is cut or on actions of a much deeper level, such as Louis's actions in light of this announcement.

Isn't this post I am quoting passing judgement on those who've shared their critical opinons?
Excellent words of wisdom, Genevieve. I applaud you for this post.
__________________
  #118  
Old 09-25-2005, 04:44 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago, United States
Posts: 1,538
Quote:
Originally Posted by Princejonnhy25
You guys act like he is the first royal to have a child outside of wedlock. It is much better that the whole family help raise this child. Louis is not the first royal in history to have a bastard child. He is doing the right think by announcing it and being a proper father to the child. He could have easily paid his girlfriend to stay quite and set up trust funds and never see the child like other royals do but he is being responsible.
He and Tessy conceived the child, then let the two of them raise the baby and not have a slew of nannies do it, 19 or no 19.

You (not you personally, Princejonnhy25) want to be mature and adult by announcing the pregnancy, then step up to the plate, take the responsibility and raise the baby yourselves, do not expect others to do it for you.
__________________
  #119  
Old 09-25-2005, 05:47 PM
Ditebaby's Avatar
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Port Orchard, United States
Posts: 177
I was a little shocked to hear that Louis is having a baby at 19. But I am also proud that he's acknowledging the child and mother. I wouldn't be surprised if they end up getting married next year after the baby is born. When it come's to the nannies I think that would be kind of stupid they should do the work themselves. However having the parents assist when they have no clue what to do is also a good idea. That way they have someone with experience to listen to and when they make a mistake they won't screw the child up.
__________________
  #120  
Old 09-25-2005, 06:03 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago, United States
Posts: 1,538
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ditebaby
I was a little shocked to hear that Louis is having a baby at 19. But I am also proud that he's acknowledging the child and mother. I wouldn't be surprised if they end up getting married next year after the baby is born. When it come's to the nannies I think that would be kind of stupid they should do the work themselves. However having the parents assist when they have no clue what to do is also a good idea. That way they have someone with experience to listen to and when they make a mistake they won't screw the child up.
Why? They got themselves into trouble, they should pay the price and take responsibility for it.

If you are old enough to have sex, you are old enough to accept the consequences for the outcomes of your actions.

I cannot believe how many people feel if you make a mistake, someone else should clean up after you and raise the baby.

It amazes me all the time how often in this world we hear, "we are too young to be parents, you raise the baby".

You do the crime, you do the time....

The only person ever to get the raw deal here is the poor baby...not the parents, they knew what they were doing from the moment the clothes came off...not to get too graphic here.
__________________

__________________
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Prince Gustaf Adolf (1906-1947) - King Carl XVI Gustaf's Father Devin Swedish Royal History 124 12-12-2013 08:20 PM
“Prince William’s Passion: New Father, New Hope” CNN Program 2013 Dman The Electronic Domain 20 09-16-2013 10:49 AM
Prince Rainier: a father, a grandfather.... towsend Princely Family of Monaco 154 12-14-2009 09:13 AM
Oleg Cassini.....Possibly Prince Albert's REAL Father?? Casira_Azul Prince Albert, Princess Charlene and Family 65 08-16-2005 09:40 PM
Prince Albert Is the Father of Alexandre destiny Prince Albert, Princess Charlene and Family 491 07-27-2005 03:47 PM




Popular Tags
belgium brussels carl philip charlene chris o'neill crown prince frederik crown princess mary crown princess mette-marit crown princess victoria current events engagement fashion genealogy germany grand duke henri hohenzollern infanta sofia jordan king carl xvi gustav king felipe king felipe vi king harald king juan carlos king philippe king willem-alexander letizia luxembourg nobility official visit olympics ottoman pieter van vollenhoven poland president hollande president komorowski prince albert prince albert ii prince carl philip prince constantijn prince daniel prince floris prince pieter-christiaan princess aimee princess alexia (2005 -) princess anita princess beatrix princess charlene princess laurentien princess madeleine princess margriet princess marilene princess mary princess mary fashion queen fabiola queen letizia queen mathilde queen maxima queen rania queen silvia queen sofia royal royal fashion russia sofia hellqvist spain state visit sweden the hague wedding winter olympics 2014



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:06 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014
Jelsoft Enterprises

Royal News Delivered to your Email!

You can get the latest Royal News right in your inbox.

unsusbcribe at anytime with one click

Close [X]