The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #281  
Old 12-30-2005, 02:43 PM
Princejohnny25's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: , Antarctica
Posts: 2,033
Wow he is hot, that whole family is. Tessy is in the military. Im sure she is responsible and very mature for her age. Louis is very lucky, he has the meens and support to take care of this child. I think things will change for them but I dont think it will ruin their life. He is so attractive, he is too young to be tied down. He should enjoy years of having fun. But, now he will have to just live a more toned down life. How long have they been going out? Do they live together. Will she move into the palace?
__________________

__________________
  #282  
Old 12-30-2005, 03:09 PM
grim_lady's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A, United States
Posts: 424
Quote:
Originally Posted by Princejonnhy25
Will she move into the palace?
Since she and Louis aren't married yet I doubt that she'd actually move into the palace. It might happen if the two got married but I'd think they'd want to find their own place to live where they could start a family (or continue it anyway).
__________________

__________________
  #283  
Old 12-30-2005, 05:42 PM
Princejohnny25's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: , Antarctica
Posts: 2,033
I dont think the matter of marriage matters right now. They will have to live together married or not. They might get a place of their own but moving into the palace would be more efficient.
__________________
  #284  
Old 12-30-2005, 11:17 PM
suturegeisha's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Fort Mill, United States
Posts: 788
Quote:
Originally Posted by Princejonnhy25
I dont think the matter of marriage matters right now. They will have to live together married or not. They might get a place of their own but moving into the palace would be more efficient.
I read in a Belgian newspaper that they are planning to set up house together in Switzerland.
__________________
[COLOR="Purple"]What is a wedding? Webster's Dictionary defines a wedding as "The process of removing weeds from one's garden."
--Homer Simpson, giving a lecture on marriage
  #285  
Old 12-30-2005, 11:58 PM
Princejohnny25's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: , Antarctica
Posts: 2,033
Switzerland! Why so far away. I like switzerland and I think it is a great place to raise a family but why move. It kinda looks like the RF is kicking him out. Maybe those are the rumours the Grand Duke was talking about in his speech. Whatever they choose I hope they work things out.
__________________
  #286  
Old 12-31-2005, 12:50 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,194
Quote:
Originally Posted by Princejonnhy25
Wow he is hot, that whole family is. Tessy is in the military. Im sure she is responsible and very mature for her age. Louis is very lucky, he has the meens and support to take care of this child. I think things will change for them but I dont think it will ruin their life. He is so attractive, he is too young to be tied down. He should enjoy years of having fun. But, now he will have to just live a more toned down life. How long have they been going out? Do they live together. Will she move into the palace?
I know, they're soooo hot! They had been going out for year before she got pregnant.
__________________
Hasta la vista, baby!
  #287  
Old 01-29-2006, 08:36 PM
Mathilde1286's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: -, United States
Posts: 607
Is there any new news about the baby?
__________________
"ONE" *Get involved and help with the fight against extreme poverty!!*

www.one.org
  #288  
Old 01-30-2006, 06:24 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,194
No, but Louis wasn't at his grandfather's bday party.
__________________
Hasta la vista, baby!
  #289  
Old 01-31-2006, 03:49 AM
Warren's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15,377
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathilde1286
Is there any new news about the baby?
We will need to wait until the baby is born.
__________________
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
  #290  
Old 01-31-2006, 02:29 PM
Mathilde1286's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: -, United States
Posts: 607
It's March, right?
__________________
"ONE" *Get involved and help with the fight against extreme poverty!!*

www.one.org
  #291  
Old 01-31-2006, 05:11 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,194
Yes. I wonder if they know what gender the baby will be.
__________________
Hasta la vista, baby!
  #292  
Old 01-31-2006, 07:28 PM
grim_lady's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A, United States
Posts: 424
I sort of think it will be a girl :). But it still seems a bit early to start guessing now.
__________________
  #293  
Old 01-31-2006, 08:15 PM
hillary_nugent's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: , Australia
Posts: 3,048
Why do you think the baby will be a girl? =]
__________________
I came. I saw. I posted.
  #294  
Old 01-31-2006, 08:21 PM
grim_lady's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A, United States
Posts: 424
I can just really imagine Louis having this adorable little blond haired girl just running around smiling in family pictures. (Oh and I take back that "too early" remark. I just realized that March is NEXT month!)
__________________
  #295  
Old 01-31-2006, 10:11 PM
MyAdia's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 254
Wow, I've been mostly a read-only participant in this forum. But, some of the responses to this thread have led me to respond. I must admit I really did not know all of these royal families existed. In America, we mostly hear about the British Royal family and occasionally the Monaco family.

The second most puzzling aspect for me in reading these threads (the first is the Mary haters/worshippers discussions) is this negative judgment of those princes/princesses who have out of wedlock children WHEREAS similar princes/princesses who are having pre-marital sex aren’t judged negatively. I find the judgment of this young prince (and now his family) and others that you sneer at and turn your nose at because of their out of wedlock children so puzzling and hypocritical. Do you think William and Harry are virgins? Were Mary, Letizia, Mathilde, Maxima, etc. all virgins before they had their weddings and then legitimate children?


It is amazing to hear so many of you gush about other royal/princely families that are so much more perfect or righteous because they do not have these “illegitimate” children. Is the immoral act the pre-marital sex or not being more responsible in using birth control? You do realize that out of wedlock children are produce when you have out of wedlock sex.
If the judgment is based on the pre-marital sex, do you actual believe that your favorite prince/princess couple refrained from sex before they got married and had their perfect little prince/princess that you gush over as you watch their christenings?


It’s not just this forum, but in America it is very common to label people who have out of wedlock children as immoral, but the same label is not applied to couples that have pre-marital sex. I’m sorry, but I find this all so puzzling and hypocritical.

Continue on.
__________________
  #296  
Old 01-31-2006, 10:34 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: , Canada
Posts: 3,220
I don't think anybody in this thread has labelled Prince Louis or his girlfriend immoral or trashy or anything of that nature.

Initially, when the news was first announced I think shocked is a good word to describe the general reaction and concensus. Mainly because the gossip mill had the situation pegged to Louis' brother Felix and not him.

But I think that there was also shock about the age of Louis and his girlfriend. If you follow the thread of when Prince Albert of Monaco confirmed that he had a two-year-old son, nobody was that shocked about it -- they were more shocked that such a situation hadn't happened sooner considering Albert's reputation as a playboy.

If you read especially the second half of this thread (when the shock had worn off), you'll see many responses about how members wish Louis and his girlfriend and their baby the best. The members who have posted in this thread are genuinely happy for them now and are interested in the well being of Louis and his girlfriend's life and the birth of this child.
__________________
  #297  
Old 02-01-2006, 01:36 PM
Mathilde1286's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: -, United States
Posts: 607
Quote:
Originally Posted by MyAdia
Wow, I've been mostly a read-only participant in this forum. But, some of the responses to this thread have led me to respond. I must admit I really did not know all of these royal families existed. In America, we mostly hear about the British Royal family and occasionally the Monaco family.

The second most puzzling aspect for me in reading these threads (the first is the Mary haters/worshippers discussions) is this negative judgment of those princes/princesses who have out of wedlock children WHEREAS similar princes/princesses who are having pre-marital sex aren’t judged negatively. I find the judgment of this young prince (and now his family) and others that you sneer at and turn your nose at because of their out of wedlock children so puzzling and hypocritical. Do you think William and Harry are virgins? Were Mary, Letizia, Mathilde, Maxima, etc. all virgins before they had their weddings and then legitimate children?


It is amazing to hear so many of you gush about other royal/princely families that are so much more perfect or righteous because they do not have these “illegitimate” children. Is the immoral act the pre-marital sex or not being more responsible in using birth control? You do realize that out of wedlock children are produce when you have out of wedlock sex.
If the judgment is based on the pre-marital sex, do you actual believe that your favorite prince/princess couple refrained from sex before they got married and had their perfect little prince/princess that you gush over as you watch their christenings?


It’s not just this forum, but in America it is very common to label people who have out of wedlock children as immoral, but the same label is not applied to couples that have pre-marital sex. I’m sorry, but I find this all so puzzling and hypocritical.

Continue on.
Well said, Alexandria.

I don't think anyone knows whether any royals were virgins before. That said, it's not really an appropriate topic. Like Alexandria posted, most of the posts are from well-wishers, anyways. This is a royal forums...most people are going to be "gushing" for their favorite RFs...even so, if a RF did have an illegitimate child, which there are...nobody hates them for it. Like I said, it's a royal forum...people here are here to discuss royal families and follow their events. Again, we admire and critic them. A Christening is a joyous thing, why would anyone taint an event like that with slander?? No one is placing any kind of judgment of prematital sex, anyway. Maybe it's you who thinks a royal family is perfect or righteous if they do not have illigetimate children...no one has said that.

Children ARE produced out of wedlock sex, but there are also children produced out of conjugal sex.
__________________
"ONE" *Get involved and help with the fight against extreme poverty!!*

www.one.org
  #298  
Old 02-01-2006, 03:35 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 617
Quote:
Originally Posted by MyAdia
Wow, I've been mostly a read-only participant in this forum. But, some of the responses to this thread have led me to respond. I must admit I really did not know all of these royal families existed. In America, we mostly hear about the British Royal family and occasionally the Monaco family.

The second most puzzling aspect for me in reading these threads (the first is the Mary haters/worshippers discussions) is this negative judgment of those princes/princesses who have out of wedlock children WHEREAS similar princes/princesses who are having pre-marital sex aren’t judged negatively. I find the judgment of this young prince (and now his family) and others that you sneer at and turn your nose at because of their out of wedlock children so puzzling and hypocritical. Do you think William and Harry are virgins? Were Mary, Letizia, Mathilde, Maxima, etc. all virgins before they had their weddings and then legitimate children?


It is amazing to hear so many of you gush about other royal/princely families that are so much more perfect or righteous because they do not have these “illegitimate” children. Is the immoral act the pre-marital sex or not being more responsible in using birth control? You do realize that out of wedlock children are produce when you have out of wedlock sex.
If the judgment is based on the pre-marital sex, do you actual believe that your favorite prince/princess couple refrained from sex before they got married and had their perfect little prince/princess that you gush over as you watch their christenings?


It’s not just this forum, but in America it is very common to label people who have out of wedlock children as immoral, but the same label is not applied to couples that have pre-marital sex. I’m sorry, but I find this all so puzzling and hypocritical.

Continue on.
I do not think that anybody is gushing about any princess because they didn't have children out of wedlock (don't think much gushing is beind done, either). If you think of Mette-Marit, who had a child out of wedlock prior to marrying the Hakoon, she was supported rather than bashed by many posters. I also wonder whether it wasn't many of the European posters who had a relatively relaxed attitude towards the whole issue than many of the Americans.
__________________
  #299  
Old 02-01-2006, 04:13 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,194
Calm down! This birth is happening whether you want it to or not. Please don't make hasty generalizations about anything, whether it be the the people posting on this forum or the country that you live in. It might have been covered up a hundred years ago, but that does not mean that it is now. Royals are far more open. Have you ever lived in the real word?
__________________
Hasta la vista, baby!
  #300  
Old 02-01-2006, 10:29 PM
Gentry
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 96
will Louis's child have a title prince or princess?
__________________

__________________
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Prince Gustaf Adolf (1906-1947) - King Carl XVI Gustaf's Father Devin Swedish Royal History 124 12-12-2013 08:20 PM
“Prince William’s Passion: New Father, New Hope” CNN Program 2013 Dman The Electronic Domain 20 09-16-2013 10:49 AM
Prince Rainier: a father, a grandfather.... towsend Princely Family of Monaco 154 12-14-2009 09:13 AM
Oleg Cassini.....Possibly Prince Albert's REAL Father?? Casira_Azul Prince Albert and Princess Charlene 65 08-16-2005 09:40 PM
Prince Albert Is the Father of Alexandre destiny Prince Albert and Princess Charlene 491 07-27-2005 03:47 PM




Additional Links
Popular Tags
abdication birth bourbon-parma charlene chris o'neill crown prince felipe crown prince haakon crown princess letizia crown princess mary crown princess mette-marit crown princess victoria current events duchess of cambridge dutch royal history fashion grand duchess maria teresa grand duke henri hohenzollern infanta elena infanta leonor infanta sofia jordan kate middleton king abdullah ii king carl xvi gustav king felipe king felipe vi king harald king juan carlos king philippe king willem-alexander luxembourg olympic games ottoman picture of the month pom prince albert prince albert ii prince carl philip prince constantijn prince felipe prince floris prince pieter-christiaan princess alexia (2005 -) princess anita princess ariane princess beatrix princess catharina-amalia princess charlene princess claire princess laurentien princess letizia princess mabel princess madeleine princess margriet princess mary queen letizia queen mathilde queen maxima queen rania queen silvia queen sofia royal russia sofia hellqvist spain state visit visit wedding winter olympics 2014



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:59 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014
Jelsoft Enterprises

Royal News Delivered to your Email!

You can get the latest Royal News right in your inbox.

unsusbcribe at anytime with one click

Close [X]