Gloriana said:The word 'bastard' is very ugly and should never be used to define an innocent child, IMO.
Gloriana said:The word 'bastard' is very ugly and should never be used to define an innocent child, IMO.
lise said:I agree. It sounds mean to call a child a bastard, even if the child is one in the true meaning of the word.
Gillian said:When we can to see first picture of little Gabriel?
gaggleofcrazypeople said:Eventually they will, or the paparrazzi will.
gaggleofcrazypeople said:Well, they did go to boarding school that was reeeaaallllly private.
In this sense, I think Gabriel, Tessy and Louis are pretty lucky: They won't have paparazzi hunting them down to sneak pictures of Gabriel in his car seat or bundled up in his mother's arms going to the doctor's office.Princejohnny25 said:Royals dont sell gossip and celebrity mags in Luxembourg like they do in other monarchies. I dont think we will see the baby but we might get lucky. They probably have professional pics ready incase they ever marry and want to release them.
It would be really interesting if someone with knowledge of law could explain this in a correct way. It's hard to get familiar with such complex laws of other countries, but there has to be some kind of laws that make it possibly for Luxembourg not to have paparazzis or extreme gossip magazines... When I tried to do a little reasearch before, I read that Luxembourg have quite strict laws that protect personal privacy (and that's why the press doesn't act like in other countries), but I don't know how much there is in that.Lady Jennifer said:Are the laws in Luxembourg more severe (or strict) on invading/looking in on the private lives of royals and/or celebs living there? Or do the press/paparazzi have more respect for the privacy of these individuals?