|
|
|
|||||||
| Portal | Royal Articles | Royal Calendar | Register | FAQ | Members List | Royal Links | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
||||
 |
 |
 |
|
||
 |
 |
|
|||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#81
02-25-2007, 01:19 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
We should really to stop talk about this. Her mother was almost 34 when she had gave birth Victoria. Btw. Victoria is almost 30.  Last edited by magnik; 02-25-2007 at 01:25 PM. 
|
|
#83
02-25-2007, 01:28 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Btw. maybe she should have children right now before someone'll say that she is too old for it? how it is right now with her sister. Last edited by magnik; 02-25-2007 at 01:37 PM.
|
|
#84
02-25-2007, 01:45 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes, it is true, both are still very young, no reason to panic.
But it doesn't make sense either to say, all the crown princes married very late, she should do the same. Philippe married with 39, but he can have children with 46 , for Victoria that would be too late, I believe ( though of course not impossible). I agree, the discussion now does not make a lot of sense, in 10 years maybe it is different. BTW I don't think she wants to plan on having children with 60  Last edited by lilytornado; 02-25-2007 at 02:29 PM.
|
|
#85
02-25-2007, 02:09 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think Crown Princess Victoria will only start to worry if she is not married by the age of 34 about having children. Obviously it is not something which she is worrying excessively about just yet.
__________________
Where does ones childhood go? Gita.
|
|
#86
02-27-2007, 08:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
They will announce it when they are ready there doesn't seem to be any rush. Her mother was in her thirties when she married. Imo opinion I'm glad they are taking their time and getting to know each. Marriage isn't easy and for them it will be much harder.
Last edited by seto; 02-27-2007 at 08:52 AM.
|
|
#87
03-03-2007, 08:48 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Why should they care about King Haralds birthday if they want to marry?
|
|
#88
03-10-2007, 05:27 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Translated blog Entry of Jenny Alexandersson, who is reporter at Svensk Damtidning and who also has her blog there
Jenny Alexandersson - Svensk Damtidning Quote:
Firstly it is hard to believe, that we are already talking about 5 years...so about 1800 days  Secondly Miss Alexandersson is adressing one of the eternal topics in Royal watcher-land. As someone, who can even understand the somewhat unpopular opinions on equal primogeniture being wrong, I´m also understanding or not completely supporting the idea of "love" being the only or main reason for a marriage between a Royal and a commoner. If one is looking at ordinary couples the love part seems so ephemeral, that one is wondering, why things should be so different with Royals. And what love could stand an unhappy part, who doesn´t get along with being in the shadow or with being less popular? But of course marrying completely without sympathy can´t be the solution either. And I´m seriously wondering, what ppl, that are, who write to Svensk Damtidning about their negative feelings towards Daniel Westling  I think her observations about Victoria´s public personality are quite interesting as well...and I´m agreeing. This somewhat little shyness and insecurity was very charming...and it helped to try different things. These days she seems so stuck. A true professional, one could say...and probably this is coming with the years...and though I´m missing the "old" Victoria a bit  Any opinions? "I want Victoria being happy" doesn´t count! Last edited by Lena; 03-10-2007 at 05:35 PM.
|
|
#89
03-12-2007, 06:24 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hi whats this article about? Viktoria is engaged now?
Storspel på en förlovning i år - Fredag - Expressen
|
|
#90
03-12-2007, 08:15 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The relation for the payouts is 1.65 (engagement in 2007) to 2.10 (no engagement in 2007) Many had thought,there would be an engagement on the 12th of March...so yesterday (Very symbolic date...31 years ago Victoria´s parents got engaged and it´s her nameday...and this one is based on the engagement date of Queen Viktoria and King Gustaf V...They got engaged on the 12th of March 1881 and in 1882 the 12th of March was chosen as nameday for "Viktoria") Well, it didn´t happen...Nina Eldh (Head of the Royal press department) said yesterday in the morning to Expressen: --There is absolutely no sign indicating an soon engagement. That it would happen today is excluded. Her parents are on a private trip abroad and an engagement would be then strange. Does sound, as if we could burry now all hopes for an engagement in spring and wedding in summer. And since I´m pretty sure, that Victoria would marry in summer, one could also exclude a wedding for whole 2007...sigh. Last edited by Lena; 03-12-2007 at 08:29 PM.
|
|
#91
03-13-2007, 09:53 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Let's hope there will be a spring or summer 2008 wedding! I hope we are all not sat here this time next year saying the same thing, "No wedding this year, hopefully there will be one in 2009!"
__________________
Where does ones childhood go? Gita.
|
|
#92
03-13-2007, 02:04 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I know I don't want to wait anymore. I want an engagemant like this year.
Daniel Westling stop being scared and ask her already.    
|
|
#93
03-13-2007, 03:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Only because she didn´t get engaged the same day her parents or other relatives did needn´t mean that she won´t get engaged this year at all. I find it next to silly to get engaged or marry the same day your parents did. It´s the same silly discussion going around with William marrying Kate on the 29th of July. Since we know how this marriage ended if I were William I would never ever marry on that date....
The date should be your very special own and not a copy of another one. I still believe that an engagement of Victoria´s this year could be possible.
|
|
#94
03-13-2007, 05:03 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Finally a reaction, I´m considering as appropriate Quote:
 I would have liked the tradition with the parents engagement and the nameday...after all the King and Queen also got engaged at the engagement day of relatives. But I´m hoping, that Victoria and Daniel wouldn´t follow the tradition of just having an engagement time of 3 months. I could be wrong and with a future prince consort things could be different, but to me the average 8 months of engagement time, they other heirs of this generation had chosen, made perfectly sense... The idea of choosing the 19th of June as wedding day, I´m though not so fond of. Even though the marriage of their Majesties can be surely considered as more successful than the one of Charles and Diana... http://www.aftonbladet.se/atv2/popup...heter/0703/846 Last edited by Lena; 03-13-2007 at 05:08 PM.
|
|
#95
03-14-2007, 01:37 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#96
03-14-2007, 02:26 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
 And actually there is also no reason, that he would be rejected (this would practically only happen to criminal candidates...)And that with the father is of course depending from their general relationship. One would think after so many years the king would have signalised to Daniel, if he would accept him as son-in-law or not. So there is no rule saying, that she should propose to him (because she is the crown princess...the whole thing is meant to be about love...and not so much about the "reason of state") As I´m getting it, Daniel is also the one, who is supposed to hold a speech at the wedding (and not Victoria) Of course it could be, that Victoria would go modern...but I don´t think so. Last edited by Lena; 03-14-2007 at 02:30 AM.
|
|
#97
03-14-2007, 12:57 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Why should Daniel hold a speech?
|
