The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #361  
Old 07-15-2018, 07:26 AM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 135
Please dont believe anything Nigel Farage says. Everything he does is for his own benefit.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #362  
Old 07-15-2018, 07:32 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 4,275
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katymcwaity View Post
Please dont believe anything Nigel Farage says. Everything he does is for his own benefit.
How does that make him different to most politicans and people?
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #363  
Old 07-19-2018, 03:23 PM
Furienna's Avatar
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Örnsköldsvik, Sweden
Posts: 1,400
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mirabel View Post
Really?
And there's so many news articles about it!

Guess I am one of those naive people who tends to believe what I read.
I apologize.
It all depends on where in Sweden you live. The three big cities (Stockholm, Gothenburg and Malmö) have way more crime than little towns in the periphery regions.
Reply With Quote
  #364  
Old 07-20-2018, 12:27 AM
Frozen Royalist's Avatar
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Raleigh, United States
Posts: 189
Let's just face it, the closest America will come to being a monarchy is a nepotistic republic and especially under a certain and "special" family from New York City.

Except for maybe 13% of the US population, the majority of of Americans don't want a monarchy. Even though I'm an American monarchist I realize that an American Empire, United Kingdom of America or whatever you want to call it would not happen unless it was forced. Who knows that may just happen considering most of my fellow Americans are getting turned off by the idea of democratically elected government, I'm personally against the idea of authoritarian coups but I think you guys get the idea.

I suppose there would be an off chance if we ever balkanize then there could be a nation that becomes a constitutional monarchy but that nation would most likely be Hawaii. Actually a Californian Kingdom sounds rather awesome with the bear flag being modified with a crown and all, I know it probably won't happen in the even of Californian independence but I can still have an imagination


-Frozen Royalist

P.S. Forgive me I was confused about whether this forum was about establishing an American monarchy or just Americans and foreign monarchies in general.
Reply With Quote
  #365  
Old 07-20-2018, 12:58 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Wherever, United States
Posts: 5,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pranter View Post
There has been women who ran for president way before this. Somewhere along the way I think people forgot.


LaRae
People didn’t forget. It wasn’t the same thing. Like her or not, Hillary Clinton is a trailblazer of her time and accomplished something no other woman has done.

In terms of monarchy, despite the political turmoil this country has experienced and the uncertainties lay ahead, I can’t imagine US will become a monarchy. It just goes against the founding pillars of this country.
Reply With Quote
  #366  
Old 07-20-2018, 01:06 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Wherever, United States
Posts: 5,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mirabel View Post
Really?
And there's so many news articles about it!

Guess I am one of those naive people who tends to believe what I read.
I apologize.
I thought this was debunked when the comment was first made? It was simply a false rumor our President started spreading that had no basis in stats or facts after he watched a distorted and inaccurate special on Fox the night before (this came in form of a tweet IIRC). And I believe some in Swedish government were quite upset by it understandably.
Reply With Quote
  #367  
Old 07-20-2018, 05:45 PM
Al_bina's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: City, Kazakhstan
Posts: 8,028
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqui24 View Post
People didn’t forget. It wasn’t the same thing. Like her or not, Hillary Clinton is a trailblazer of her time and accomplished something no other woman has done.

In terms of monarchy, despite the political turmoil this country has experienced and the uncertainties lay ahead, I can’t imagine US will become a monarchy. It just goes against the founding pillars of this country.
One might presume that loftier, or, shall we say, less questionable trailblazers, who do not snicker at the opponent's untimely demise at the national TV, are required to found a royal house.
__________________
"I never did mind about the little things"
Amanda, "Point of No Return"
Reply With Quote
  #368  
Old 07-20-2018, 05:58 PM
Somebody's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Somewhere, Suriname
Posts: 3,477
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqui24 View Post
People didn’t forget. It wasn’t the same thing. Like her or not, Hillary Clinton is a trailblazer of her time and accomplished something no other woman has done.

In terms of monarchy, despite the political turmoil this country has experienced and the uncertainties lay ahead, I can’t imagine US will become a monarchy. It just goes against the founding pillars of this country.
I don't see it happening either but it is still interesting how the US president has somewhat comparable power to that of a king a few centuries ago while the current monarchs in western countries (except for the small princedoms of Monaco and Liechtenstein) don't have that power any longer. So, it's no longer a hereditary system but the American system is still rather comparable to that of a monarchy in previous times.
Reply With Quote
  #369  
Old 01-17-2019, 08:26 AM
MARG's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 9,056
^^^^^ Indeed you have point. The US seems to be 'ruled by decree' (Executive Order) by a Head of State with far more scope to order what he wills (right down to demanding his perceived enemies be locked up). That is far more power than almost all Kings, Queens, Princes and Arch-duke's Regnant have in the western world.
__________________
MARG
"Words ought to be a little wild, for they are assaults of thoughts on the unthinking." - JM Keynes
Reply With Quote
  #370  
Old 01-17-2019, 08:37 AM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 14,090
With a apolitical constitutional monarch, what a country has is a monarch that represents *all* of the people, *all* of the time. A head of state that is outside politics and referendums and differences of opinion on how the country is run but represents everything that is about that country as a whole.

In the US we have the two sides of the aisle in the House of Representatives and the Senate and a party affiliated President with executive powers. If the two sides of our law making bodies can't agree on anything, there's going to be a whole lot of pissed off people with a president that can "enforce" something on his own "will and pleasure" according to the rules of executive powers.

For the people, by the people and of the people has long since disappeared.

The US definitely could use Felix the Cat right about now and his magic bag o' tricks. He couldn't do any worse than what we already have.
__________________
No law can be sacred to me but that of my nature. Good and bad are but names very readily transferable to that or this; the only right is what is after my constitution, the only wrong what is against it.

~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
Reply With Quote
  #371  
Old 01-17-2019, 11:27 AM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Bellevue, United States
Posts: 1,058
Quote:
Originally Posted by MARG View Post
^^^^^ Indeed you have point. The US seems to be 'ruled by decree' (Executive Order) by a Head of State with far more scope to order what he wills (right down to demanding his perceived enemies be locked up). That is far more power than almost all Kings, Queens, Princes and Arch-duke's Regnant have in the western world.

No, the President does NOT have that power. Donald Trump just *thinks* he does. And I'm not being sarcastic.
Reply With Quote
  #372  
Old 01-17-2019, 11:42 AM
Pranter's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 11,364
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gawin View Post
No, the President does NOT have that power. Donald Trump just *thinks* he does. And I'm not being sarcastic.
He's just another one in the line of several who think they do/did...anyone expressing shock about this has not been paying attention.


LaRae
Reply With Quote
  #373  
Old 01-17-2019, 02:07 PM
MARG's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 9,056
No shock, merely awe at the utter dearth of unders
__________________
MARG
"Words ought to be a little wild, for they are assaults of thoughts on the unthinking." - JM Keynes
Reply With Quote
  #374  
Old 01-17-2019, 07:44 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Bellevue, United States
Posts: 1,058
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pranter View Post
He's just another one in the line of several who think they do/did...anyone expressing shock about this has not been paying attention.


LaRae
Donald Trump has taken it to new heights. Or perhaps "lows" would be the better word .
Reply With Quote
  #375  
Old 01-17-2019, 08:00 PM
Pranter's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 11,364
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gawin View Post
Donald Trump has taken it to new heights. Or perhaps "lows" would be the better word .
I don't know about that...I haven't compared all past presidents who used the power to circumvent the Constitution ...I'm guessing he is no better or worse than the rest of them.



LaRae
Reply With Quote
  #376  
Old 01-17-2019, 08:02 PM
Marengo's Avatar
Administrator
Royal Blogger, TRF Author
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Brussels, Belgium
Posts: 20,976
Let's keep the sitting American president out of this thread & move on.
__________________

__________________
TRF Rules and FAQ
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
monarchist, politics, royal, royalist tea party, united states


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
British Royalty and the United States ysbel British Royals 63 11-20-2014 05:04 PM
King Carl Gustaf and Queen Silvia's Visit to the United States: May 8-11, 2013 Lumutqueen King Carl XVI Gustaf and Queen Silvia 42 05-28-2013 06:10 PM
United Arab Emirates and The Gulf States kashmiri Royal Genealogy 26 03-05-2013 01:11 PM
Prince and Princess of Asturias's Visit to the United States: June 20-23, 2012 lula King Felipe VI, Queen Letizia and Family 78 07-15-2012 03:20 PM




Popular Tags
archie mountbatten-windsor aristocracy bangladesh bavaria;house;chef;luitpold;ludwig belgian royal belgian royal family birthday celebration charles of wales crown prince hussein's future wife crusades current events cypher danish royalty denmark duchess of cambridge duchess of sussex duke & duchess of cambridge; duke of sussex dutch royal family family search felipe vi foundation french royalty friendly city future future wife of prince hussein germany greece hamdan bin mohammed headship hill jerusalem king salman lithuania lithuanian palaces meghan markle memoir mohammed vi monaco history monaco royal monarchism mountbatten netflix nobel prize norway history official visit pakistan prince daniel prince harry princess benedikte princess margaret qe2 rown royal children royal tour russian imperial family saudi arabia savoy saxony south africa spain spanish history state visit state visit to denmark sweden swedish royalty tracts trump valois visit from sweden


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:21 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2019
Jelsoft Enterprises
×