The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #261  
Old 04-19-2017, 05:52 AM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 11,731
The most senior member of the British Royal Family to have a known child as the result of a one-night stand is Mark Philips. It was one of the reasons for the separation and divorce from Anne - not that he had done so but that he was found out.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #262  
Old 05-07-2017, 11:20 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 633
Succession Rights For Illegitimate Royal Children

Why are illegitimate and adopted children out of line for the throne, when they are clearly the royal's children? My brother and I are adopted (our youngest brother is not); my cousin and his girlfriend (on my dad's side) just had a baby girl last week; and 43 years ago my dad's sister got pregnant at 19 but they got married when she was three months along, and have been married for almost 43 years; with three sons, five grandsons and three granddaughters, plus a grand-dog (a chocolate Lab). Same on my mom's side; my mom's oldest brother got married at 22 when his 19-year-old bride was seven months pregnant with their daughter, and she already had an almost 2-year-old daughter from a previous relationship. My uncle adopted his wife's firstborn daughter, and until the day he died she never thought of him as anything but her dad. My uncle and aunt also had a son a few years later, and were married for almost 39 years before lung cancer took his life at 61.


Sent from my iPod touch using The Royals Community
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #263  
Old 05-08-2017, 12:37 AM
Countessmeout's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 8,990
Adopted is because it isn't their child. When it comes to inheriting, it is about blood lines. Adopted children don't share blood, they don't carry on the family. Daughters may have a different last name, but they at least have blood.

Legitimate it's simply a matter of upholding the sanctity of marriage. Unfortunately royal men of the past weren't good about keeping their.... In their pants By restricting it to children born in wedlock, it also limits the chances of fighting for the throne. Until recent decades, there was no way to tell if your mistress was pregnant with your child. Many mistresses were married after all. If your bastard could be your Legal heir, how many would come out if the wood work claiming to be a royal child and eldest.

Not to say it didn't happen. Some childless kings did adopt heirs. They were related in some way. See that in Sweden. Monaco most recently. Rainiers mother was a bastard. Her father adopted her as his heir.

It was also highly common to give bastards titles and positions. The Stewart's, especially in their Scotland only days, were well known. But the English and French courts often did. Henry VIII did with one. Henry it is rumored considered making his son, who he named duke of Richmond, his heir after Elizabeth was declared bastard. But the boy died from consumption.
Reply With Quote
  #264  
Old 05-08-2017, 05:48 AM
Duc_et_Pair's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Netherlands
Posts: 8,361
Quote:
Originally Posted by sarahedwards2 View Post
Why are illegitimate and adopted children out of line for the throne, when they are clearly the royal's children? My brother and I are adopted (our youngest brother is not); my cousin and his girlfriend (on my dad's side) just had a baby girl last week; and 43 years ago my dad's sister got pregnant at 19 but they got married when she was three months along, and have been married for almost 43 years; with three sons, five grandsons and three granddaughters, plus a grand-dog (a chocolate Lab). Same on my mom's side; my mom's oldest brother got married at 22 when his 19-year-old bride was seven months pregnant with their daughter, and she already had an almost 2-year-old daughter from a previous relationship. My uncle adopted his wife's firstborn daughter, and until the day he died she never thought of him as anything but her dad. My uncle and aunt also had a son a few years later, and were married for almost 39 years before lung cancer took his life at 61.


Sent from my iPod touch using The Royals Community
In most monarchies approval must be given for a royal marriage. For an example in the Netherlands even both Chambers of Parliament have to assemble in a joint session to read and debate a Bill of Consent for an intended marriage of a royal successor! Engaging into a marriage without and Act of Consent is equal to renouncing all rights. The intention is clear: the Government and Parliament wants to control who has access to the throne. If the rules are that strict (at the moment there are 5 royals in the Dutch royal family whom engaged into marriage without requesting an Act of Consent and have lost all rights, for themselves and for all their descendants).

Having said that, most monarchies have a provision for the eventuality that there is no legitimate heir anymore. In theory that is. In practice it will be the end of a monarchy and the start of a republic.
Reply With Quote
  #265  
Old 05-11-2017, 07:47 PM
XeniaCasaraghi's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Texas, United States
Posts: 3,512
Illegitimate or adopted should get a portion of the wealth but inheriting thrones or titles should only be biological relations or legitimate children.
__________________
Princess Grace, April 19, 1956
Princess Margaret Rose, May 6, 1960
Crown Princess Mette-Marit, August 25, 2001
Jaqueline Bouvier Kennedy, September 12, 1953
Countess Stephanie of Belgium October 20, 2012
Reply With Quote
  #266  
Old 06-11-2017, 06:09 PM
ldmemail's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bath, United Kingdom
Posts: 335
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie View Post
The most senior member of the British Royal Family to have a known child as the result of a one-night stand is Mark Philips. It was one of the reasons for the separation and divorce from Anne - not that he had done so but that he was found out.


Captain Mark Phillips is a former member by marriage of the British Royal Family, his illegitimate child affected no one .
Reply With Quote
  #267  
Old 06-11-2017, 06:58 PM
Ish's Avatar
Ish Ish is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 4,025
Quote:
Originally Posted by ldmemail View Post
Captain Mark Phillips is a former member by marriage of the British Royal Family, his illegitimate child affected no one .


I would guess that his illegitimate child affected him, his wife, and his 2 children from his first marriage...

In terms of succession rights, I believe the closest-to-the succession illegitimately born children are in the Lascelles branch of the family... First, among the children of David Lascelles, 8th Earl of Harewood is his daughter Lady Emily Shard and son Hon Benjamin Lascelles, who were born before his marriage, and his grandson, Leo Lascelles (son of the Earl's 3rd child and heir apparent, Alexander Lascelles). Then comes Tanit Lascelles, herself the daughter of Hon James Lascelles, the Earl's younger brother.
Reply With Quote
  #268  
Old 06-11-2017, 07:02 PM
ldmemail's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bath, United Kingdom
Posts: 335
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ish View Post
I would guess that his illegitimate child affected him, his wife, and his 2 children from his first marriage...

In terms of succession rights, I believe the closest-to-the succession illegitimately born children are in the Lascelles branch of the family... First, among the children of David Lascelles, 8th Earl of Harewood is his daughter Lady Emily Shard and son Hon Benjamin Lascelles, who were born before his marriage, and his grandson, Leo Lascelles (son of the Earl's 3rd child and heir apparent, Alexander Lascelles). Then comes Tanit Lascelles, herself the daughter of Hon James Lascelles, the Earl's younger brother.


That goes without saying! The fact that this child was born did not affect the Royal Family nor is the child affecting the succession rights of the Royal Family, which is the point of the discussion!
Reply With Quote
  #269  
Old 06-11-2017, 07:04 PM
ldmemail's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bath, United Kingdom
Posts: 335
Quote:
Originally Posted by ldmemail View Post
That goes without saying! The fact that this child was born did not affect the Royal Family nor is the child affecting the succession rights of the Royal Family, which is the point of the discussion!


Also all of the illegitimate Lascelles are not able to inherit the Harewood title and have no rights to the Crown.
Reply With Quote
  #270  
Old 06-10-2018, 11:48 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Brussels, Belgium
Posts: 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry's polo shirt View Post
Belgian royal family illegitament children: Leopold I, the first Belgian king, had a mistress, Arcadie Cadet, for whom he arranged a marriage with an officer from his staff, Friedrich Meyer. Arcadie Meyer gave birth to two illegitimate royal children, Georges and Arthur. The king gave Arcadie and her children a nobility title, "Barron of Eppinghoven". Her descendants are living in Canada. Leopold II also had two illegitimate children with his mistress Blanche Delacroix, whom he married on his death bed. Lucien Delacroix became Duke of Tervuren, Philippe Delacroix Count of Ravenstein. Prince Charles, who briefly held office as Regent of Belgium after World War II, also had an illegitimate child, Isabelle Wybo.

In his book "A Throne in Brussels", author Paul Belien reveals that Count Michel Didisheim is an illegitimate son of King Leopold III, the father of kings Albert and Baudouin.

!!!!!!!!!!thanks to http://lvb.net/item/1170 --WARNING WEBSITE CONTAINS VERY NAUGHTY PICTURE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Untrue, Arcadie's mother arranged the marriage, Leopold didn't. No source or proof. She also had lovers, so her children may not have been his. She was dismissed as a mistress very soon after the death of Queen Louise because the King saw how much this fortune seeker was hurting his children.

Paul Belien is a loathsome source for information - his book is pure trash.
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
advice, questions, royal, title, titles


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Prince Bernhard's Illegitimate Children Australian Dutch Royals 93 02-12-2018 05:43 PM
June 2008 Newsletter: The illegitimate children of royals Lady Jennifer Forum Announcements and Admin 6 06-01-2008 09:02 PM




Popular Tags
british royal family britishroyals camilla chris o'neill clothes commonwealth games crown princess victoria current events documentary duchess of sussex duke of york earl of snowdon emma family fashion felipe and letizia forum general news hereditary grand duchess stéphanie hereditary grand duke guillaume hereditary prince alois infanta cristina iñaki urdangarín juan carlos king philippe king willem-alexander liechtenstein lord snowdon meghan markle member news porphyria prince alexander prince charles prince daniel prince gabriel prince harry prince harry of wales prince jean prince laurent princenapoleon prince nicholas prince oscar prince sebastian princess alexandra of luxembourg princess beatrice princess claire princess elisabeth princess estelle princess leonore princess madeleine princess sofia princess victoria pyrmont queen mathilde queen maxima quizz royal royal ancestry royal geneology royal wedding state visit stephanie sweden swedish royal family swedish royal registry tradition victoria wedding windsor castle



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:59 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2018
Jelsoft Enterprises