The Royal Forums Coat of Arms

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Royal Highlights > General Royal Discussion

Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #141  
Old 01-26-2016, 08:51 AM
Pranter's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 2,835
There's never been any difference between royal houses and the peasants other than power in it's various forms. There's no special bloodline or 'aura' to someone who is designated 'royal'.



LaRae
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #142  
Old 01-26-2016, 09:22 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: *******, Canada
Posts: 4,055
When you look at the BRF, the last princess to marry in was Marina of Greece and Denmark. Something like 80 years ago. The last prince was Philip but the British monarchy is as popular as ever.

Its the norm throughout Europe now. Its not an issue at all.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #143  
Old 01-29-2016, 12:34 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gonzales, Louisiana, United States
Posts: 624
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pranter View Post
There's never been any difference between royal houses and the peasants other than power in it's various forms. There's no special bloodline or 'aura' to someone who is designated 'royal'.



LaRae
Exactly - the aura only CAME from their finances enabling them to live only as peasants could admire. Finally, people began to realize their self-worth, began loathing royals/nobles/aristocrats, and took action [think the French Revolution]. I enjoy reading about royals, but realize there is no such thing as "royal" or "blue" blood, nor do I hold any high esteem for any of them. Nothing makes any royal deserving of a curtsy from me; they are after all only people. 👑
Reply With Quote
  #144  
Old 01-29-2016, 07:45 PM
Pranter's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 2,835
I don't mind the bow/curtsey ...now it's just a sign of respect or acknowledgement of a position. It's just a tradition. I don't think any of the modern royal houses require it but many people still do it.



LaRae
Reply With Quote
  #145  
Old 01-30-2016, 09:21 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gonzales, Louisiana, United States
Posts: 624
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pranter View Post
I don't mind the bow/curtsey ...now it's just a sign of respect or acknowledgement of a position. It's just a tradition. I don't think any of the modern royal houses require it but many people still do it.



LaRae
I would only curtsy to the Pope, any Eastern Orthodox priest/bishop/archbishop of high-ranking, or any other religious representative, such as Rabbi, that is also considered high-ranking in their religious sect.💒⛪
Reply With Quote
  #146  
Old 01-30-2016, 09:29 PM
GömdNatt's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Cincinnati, United States
Posts: 936
Quote:
Originally Posted by NotHRH View Post
I would only curtsy to the Pope, any Eastern Orthodox priest/bishop/archbishop of high-ranking, or any other religious representative, such as Rabbi, that is also considered high-ranking in their religious sect.��⛪
interesting to me that you seem to detest the idea of curtsying/bowing to a royal, but have no problem with it for a high ranking religious person. but that's not a conversation for here.

For me, it would depend on who I'm meeting and what sort of environment we're in. Many of the royals I wouldn't object to it, but some of them I don't respect enough to do it.
__________________
My facebook fan page: https://www.facebook.com/SignyCullen
Author of fiction novel Farther Side of Away, and non-fiction book about royalty If You're a Princess, Where's Your Crown?
Reply With Quote
  #147  
Old 01-30-2016, 11:15 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,749
I would certainly curtsey to Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip if I was presented to them at a function of some sort. She's my sovereign and it's a mark of my respect for her position and that of her consort. I wouldn't expect citizens of republics to do it though, unless they really wanted to!
Reply With Quote
  #148  
Old 01-30-2016, 11:35 PM
Roslyn's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tintenbar, Australia
Posts: 3,920
I would give them a head bow, like a man does. No way in the world am I going to curtsy to anyone. I would do the same thing to Charles, Camilla, and Anne. That's probably it for that family. I'd also do the same to any other Head of State I held in high esteem, not just because they are a Head of State. And other people I hold in high esteem, too. For me it's about esteem, and I consider people have to earn that; they don't deserve it merely because of accident of birth.
__________________
"That's it then. Cancel the kitchen scraps for lepers and orphans, no more merciful beheadings, -- and call off Christmas!!!"
Reply With Quote
  #149  
Old 01-31-2016, 01:42 AM
lucymae88's Avatar
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: N/A, United States
Posts: 208
People make so big a deal out of royals marrying commoners. But most of the commoners are wealth and well to do families that hang in the same circles has royals. My question is has a royal every married someone not wealthy or from a well to do family. Someone with a normal income and life??
Reply With Quote
  #150  
Old 01-31-2016, 02:14 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,749
I don't think Queen Letizia, who is married to King Felipe of Spain, came from a particularly wealthy family. Her father was a journalist and her mother a nurse. One of her grandfathers drove cabs for a living.

Although you couldn't call Sophie Rys Jones's family working class they didn't have pots of money. I think her father sold car tyres and car products at one time, though he was from a middleclass background. Sophie wasn't in aristocratic social circles before she met Prince Edward and later became the Countess of Wessex. I believe she was working as a PR assistant when they met at a sports match.

Crown Princess Mary's father was an academic but the family weren't really wealthy. She met Crown Prince Frederik of Denmark at the Slip Inn bar in Sydney during the Sydney Olympics. She wasn't a Sydney socialite. I think she worked in the real estate business.
Reply With Quote
  #151  
Old 01-31-2016, 09:03 AM
Pranter's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 2,835
Quote:
Originally Posted by NotHRH View Post
I would only curtsy to the Pope, any Eastern Orthodox priest/bishop/archbishop of high-ranking, or any other religious representative, such as Rabbi, that is also considered high-ranking in their religious sect.💒⛪
I would genuflect to the pope, for me he is the representative of Christ on earth. However no I would not bow/curtsey etc to the heads of other religious faiths.


LaRae
Reply With Quote
  #152  
Old 01-31-2016, 12:38 PM
XeniaCasaraghi's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: 1729 Noneofyourbusiness Drive, United States
Posts: 2,702
Why do so many in this thread act like Charles and Diana are the reason royals marry commoners. Carl Gustaf married a commoner before Diana was even heard of as did Ranier. Why do some act like the British experience defines everyone else in the world?
They marry commoners because the world has expanded and they can meet and have a connection with almost everyone. Also royals are no longer the richest best most successful people in the world, all they have is lineage which most people don't give a crap about these days.
__________________
Princess Grace, April 19, 1956
Princess Margaret Rose, May 6, 1960
Crown Princess Mette-Marit, August 25, 2001
Jaqueline Bouvier Kennedy, September 12, 1953
Countess Stephanie of Belgium October 20, 2012
Reply With Quote
  #153  
Old 01-31-2016, 12:48 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 6,343
Quote:
Originally Posted by XeniaCasaraghi View Post
Why do so many in this thread act like Charles and Diana are the reason royals marry commoners. Carl Gustaf married a commoner before Diana was even heard of as did Ranier. Why do some act like the British experience defines everyone else in the world?
They marry commoners because the world has expanded and they can meet and have a connection with almost everyone. Also royals are no longer the richest best most successful people in the world, all they have is lineage which most people don't give a crap about these days.
Another aspect is that times have changed so much that it is no longer necessary to form alliances between royal houses through arranged marriages that insured a power base and ownership of land. Sometimes children were "betrothed" to each other while they were still in the cradle.
__________________
“When I was 5 years old, my mother always told me that happiness was the key to life. When I went to school, they asked me what I wanted to be when I grew up. I wrote down ‘happy’. They told me I didn’t understand the assignment, and I told them they didn’t understand life.”
― John Lennon
Reply With Quote
  #154  
Old 01-31-2016, 01:09 PM
Countessmeout's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,909
Quote:
Originally Posted by XeniaCasaraghi View Post
Why do so many in this thread act like Charles and Diana are the reason royals marry commoners. Carl Gustaf married a commoner before Diana was even heard of as did Ranier. Why do some act like the British experience defines everyone else in the world?
They marry commoners because the world has expanded and they can meet and have a connection with almost everyone. Also royals are no longer the richest best most successful people in the world, all they have is lineage which most people don't give a crap about these days.
As did Harald when he married Sonja in 1968.

Some royals are extremely rich, perhaps not the 'richest' but if you look back in the centuries they often weren't. Kings used to take loans from their nobles for military actions. The top 9 richest royals are all worth billions. Most are Asian/middle eastern but Hans Adam and Prince Albert of Monaco both break the billionaire mark. The Sultan of Brunei spent many years as the richest man in the world though that has dropped. The king of Thailand and some Saudi princes have topped him in the charts.
Reply With Quote
  #155  
Old 01-31-2016, 04:36 PM
Ish's Avatar
Ish Ish is offline
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 2,900
If we're counting Diana as a "commoner" then George VI has them all beat for marrying Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon in 1923.
Reply With Quote
  #156  
Old 01-31-2016, 05:59 PM
Countessmeout's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,909
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ish View Post
If we're counting Diana as a "commoner" then George VI has them all beat for marrying Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon in 1923.
True enough. For the modern royals, the first actual commoner marriage would be Princess Margaret to Anthony, who was made an earl after marriage. Followed by Anne and Mark Philipps. Prince Andrew would be the first son of a modern monarch. And certainly they weren't paving the way for foreign royals who had done it previously before.

Diana was the 'cinderella' image I think because she wasn't the traditional aristocratic socialite. Everyone tends to picture the pre-school teacher who cleaned flats, forgetting she grew up at Sandringham playing with Andrew and Edward, and her father was a viscount/earl.
Reply With Quote
  #157  
Old 01-31-2016, 08:11 PM
Ish's Avatar
Ish Ish is offline
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 2,900
Quote:
Originally Posted by Countessmeout View Post
True enough. For the modern royals, the first actual commoner marriage would be Princess Margaret to Anthony, who was made an earl after marriage. Followed by Anne and Mark Philipps. Prince Andrew would be the first son of a modern monarch. And certainly they weren't paving the way for foreign royals who had done it previously before.

Diana was the 'cinderella' image I think because she wasn't the traditional aristocratic socialite. Everyone tends to picture the pre-school teacher who cleaned flats, forgetting she grew up at Sandringham playing with Andrew and Edward, and her father was a viscount/earl.
Actually, if you think about it, Margaret isn't the first modern marriage between a royal and a commoner, not even in Britain. In Britain, she's beaten by her infamous uncle David, the former Edward VIII, who married Wallis Simpson in 1937.

There are predecessors to that marriage as well. Prince Sigvard of Sweden married Erica Patzek in 1934. Alfonso, Prince of Asturias, married Edelmira de Sampedro-Ocejo y Robato in 1933. And of course Carol II of Romania tops them all with his 1918 marriage of Zizi Lambrino.
Reply With Quote
  #158  
Old 01-31-2016, 08:49 PM
Countessmeout's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,909
Sorry I guess I should have specified I was referring to the modern BRF and not monarchies in general.

The difference between Margaret and her Uncle, David had to give up his place in the royal family to marry his commoner (though it was more the fact she was a divorcee). Margaret is the first in the modern BRF who married a commoner and maintained her place in the family and succession. She even gained a title.

Same goes for Sweden. CG certainly is not the first to marry a commoner, but the others before him lost their titles and place in the family to do so. It is why Bertil and Lilian waited so long to marry. Women didn't have a place in succession so it didn't matter to CG's sisters when they married.

Prince Alfonso had to renounce his rights to the throne to marry a commoner as well.

CG, Harald, Rainier and others certainly were not the first to marry commoners, but they were the ones who made it acceptable for an heir to marry a commoner and maintain their place in succession.
Reply With Quote
  #159  
Old 02-01-2016, 09:08 AM
Pranter's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 2,835
Anne Boleyn was not royal either...that's going way back.


LaRae
Reply With Quote
  #160  
Old 02-01-2016, 09:22 AM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gonzales, Louisiana, United States
Posts: 624
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pranter View Post
Anne Boleyn was not royal either...that's going way back.


LaRae
Yeah, but she had "connections" - 🏰👸👈👎👑👏
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Marriage to Commoners in Denmark Maura724 Royal House of Denmark 16 06-12-2016 09:46 AM
Marriage to Commoners vs Royals/Nobles karima Royalty Past, Present, and Future 362 06-23-2015 05:39 AM
A marriage between Prince Hisahito and Princess Aiko? Lox Prince Akishino, Princess Kiko and family 78 09-10-2014 02:00 PM
Marriage between Royals and Commoners. Part 1: Current Rulers Ennyllorac Picture of the Month, Special Features, Blogs and Articles 12 11-11-2008 01:43 PM




Popular Tags
ascot 2016 belgian queen mathilde best gown best hat best outfit camillas eveningwear catherine middleton style coup d'etat crown prince haakon crown princess mary crown princess mary evening dresses crown princess mary eveningwear crown princess mary fashion crown princess mette-marit crown princess victoria daytime fashion current events current events thread danish royal family death duchess of cambridge fashion poll felipe vi grand duke jean greece kate middleton king abdullah ii king carl gustaf's birthday king felipe king felipe and queen letizia king felipe vi king philippe king willem-alexander martha louise member introduction multiple births national day norwegian royals opening of parliament picture of the week prince bernhard princess madeleine princess mary princess mary daytime fashion princess mary eveningwear princess mary fashion princess mary hats princess sofia maternity wear princess sofia pregnancy style queen letizia queen letizia casual outfits queen letizia daytime fashion queen mathilde queen mathildes style queen maxima queen maxima casual wear queen maxima daytime fashion queen maxima fashion queen maxima hats queen maxima style queen rania royal royal fashion state visit sweden the duchess of cambridge the duchess of cambridge casual wear the duchess of cambridge daytime fashion the duchess of cambridge eveningwear the duchess of cambridge fashion the duchess of cambridge hats


Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities


Copyright 2002-2012 Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:36 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016
Jelsoft Enterprises