Greatest Monarchs Of All Time


If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
I think Queen Elizabeth II will be remembered for her unfaltering dedication to her country, putting it first, always. Through the darkest days, she never failed to be there for her country, doing what she thought best, even at the expense of her personal feelings. At her mother's funeral, she didn't cry (in public), so as not to appear weak. Although sometimes the press criticizes her for it (particularly around Princess Diana's death), I respect her for it.
 
Who do you think are the greatest monarchs of all time, and why?
 
I think it's rather impossible to limit that number to a few.

but I shall rest in a safe choice: Cyrus the Great, Messiah.
 
A good monarch leaves a memorable legacy, is remembered fondly by those who study and remember them, both in their country and abroad, and it has to be said, had one or two memorable quirks or traits. George III had poriphyra and it caused his infamous madness; Christian IX was the father- in- law of Europe. These are small examples, but both in their own right were decent men.
 
The 3 greatest monarchs have been:
Victoria- lifetime of service
Elizabeth the 2nd- lifetime of service, selfless, definition of royal majesty
George the 6th- leader of nation through world crisis, Queen Elizabeth- unified a nation
Elizabeth the 1st.- groundbreaking reign unified the nation.
Period.
And I foresee adding William the 5th and Queen Catherine to that list....;) Why? He will be a King of the people, for the people,with the people. He posses warmth, empathy, humor, compassion, leadership, bravery. determination, loyalty, honesty, gentleness, and the human touch. Catherine shares many of these qualities. They are both grounded, and comfortable in their own skin.
 
Last edited:
Elizabeth i:Just too many reasons why!
 
I think the way you can define a great monarch is by measuring his capabilities as a king, combined with him being a decent human being on the persaonal level with his family and close ones. Elizabeth II comes to mind
 
Last edited:
Tough question, since there are many ways of being great. You can be infamous great like so many "bad" monarchs, men (and some women) who enslaved their populations, but yet still added territory & populations to their kingdoms, and then there are those that are great like Elizabeth II & her father George VI who were selfless and flawless in their intent to make the monarchy respectable, adaptable & for the people.

My favorite would be George VI. He was man who never wanted to be king - he loathed public speaking (as we all know why) and yet, went on to a short & happy reign, able to overcome peoples doubts after the abdication crisis, and then fearlessly led his peoples around the world during the 2nd WW. When he died in 1952, his peoples around the world were truly moved and saddened. I believe he died the most admired and loved monarch in British history, moreso than even his daughter is today.
 
Queen Victoria
Queen Elizabeth I.
Empress Catherine II. of Russia

That´s why I support equal rights in the succession :cool:
 
Queen Victoria - overcame her difficult childhood to be a great monarch
Queen Elizabeth I - didn't need a man to be a good monarch
Queen Marie Antoinette - famous and life at Versailles and innocently taken to the guillotine and all that pomp and glamour
 
Peter
Alexander II(?)
Elizabeth I
Henry V(?)
I could put George VI in the category but most of the good during WWII was a result of Winston Churchill
 
Who do you think are the greatest monarchs of all time, and why?

Nimrod ! The first King - The man who invented the alphabet and Father of Army .
Conqueror without sacrifice - the hunter!
Unattainable military and intellectual genius.
Construction of the first city ...


He was a mighty hunter before the LORD. Therefore it is said, “Like Nimrod a mighty hunter before the LORD.”
Genesis 10:9
 
For Northern Europe at least I would say Margaret, who unified Scandinavia without much blod and led it to one of the regions longest time of peace (well, until modern time that is). More than any man in three kingdoms and one millenium managed.
She was never Queen of Denmark just "All-powerful Lady and Mistress (Regent) of the Kingdom of Denmark" and in theory only Dowager Queen for Norway and Sweden. Still she ruled all of Scandinavia for and is the reason the first Queen Regent of Denmark named Margaret use the regent name Margaret II, and I doubt there are anyone in Scandinavia that don't know why.
 
Alexander the Great - conquered much of the then known world
Peter the Great of Russia - modernizied Russia and made it into a major European power (and great in height too, 6 ft 8 in, 2 meters)
Catherine the Great of Russia - made herself empress of Russia and a patron of arts and culture
Elizabeth I of England - the Elizabethan age
 
Brian Boru,High King of Ireland
Henri IV of France
Louis XIV of France
Henry II of England
Isabella I of Castile & León
Richard The Lionheart
Louis IX of France (Saint Louis)
 
The 3 greatest monarchs have been:
Victoria- lifetime of service
Elizabeth the 2nd- lifetime of service, selfless, definition of royal majesty
George the 6th- leader of nation through world crisis, Queen Elizabeth- unified a nation
Elizabeth the 1st.- groundbreaking reign unified the nation.
Period.
And I foresee adding William the 5th and Queen Catherine to that list....;) Why? He will be a King of the people, for the people,with the people. He posses warmth, empathy, humor, compassion, leadership, bravery. determination, loyalty, honesty, gentleness, and the human touch. Catherine shares many of these qualities. They are both grounded, and comfortable in their own skin.

I really like your choices and reasons for them. You're right about Queen Victoria and Queen Elizabeth II. Victoria was dedicated to her role and knew what she had to do. However, she was the one who brought the monarchy out to the people with the family photographs. She was a strong-willed and intelligent woman and her legacy lives on in pretty much every Royal House of Europe (she was dubbed 'Grandmother of all Europe' after all).

Queen Elizabeth II is dedicated to her job, just like her great-great-grandmother. She does her job well, and is also very intelligent. She is what a monarch should be, and is respected and loved by her subjects and those who live outside of the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth (there are so many posts on this forum that express admiration for this woman, and a great deal of the posters are not British subjects).

Future William V along with his consort Catherine will do great things for their nation and Commonwealth (if such will exist). They're both kind, compassionate, intelligent, and in touch with reality and their people. If we were to go by the response they've received while on tour of Canada and US, then it's clear that people gravitate to these two, and have nothing but good things to say when asked about their impressions. It will be an honor to watch that coronation and reign (hopefully I'll be alive to see it).

George VI showed the world that one didn't have to be perfect to be a monarch. He had a speech impediment, but he was able to overcome it and by doing so, gained confidence and helped his nation (in whatever ways he could) get through World War II. Admirable indeed.

I'd like to add to this list Yekaterina II of Russia, and Aleksandr II of Russia. The former brought art and culture into the nation, and was overall, an Enlightened monarch. She received some thinkers of the Enlightment at her Court. The fact that she was able to take the throne from her husband is no small feat, since Russia was (and still is) a male-dominated society.

Aleksandr II really didn't get his chance to do all the good that he planned to do (that's what happens when people want change right away and refuse to wait just a little bit). However, the abolition of serfdom was a great achievement and earned him a place in history books around the world
 
The 3 greatest monarchs have been:
Victoria- lifetime of service
Elizabeth the 2nd- lifetime of service, selfless, definition of royal majesty
George the 6th- leader of nation through world crisis, Queen Elizabeth- unified a nation
Elizabeth the 1st.- groundbreaking reign unified the nation.
Period.
And I foresee adding William the 5th and Queen Catherine to that list....;) Why? He will be a King of the people, for the people,with the people. He posses warmth, empathy, humor, compassion, leadership, bravery. determination, loyalty, honesty, gentleness, and the human touch. Catherine shares many of these qualities. They are both grounded, and comfortable in their own skin.

I really like your choices and reasons for them. You're right about Queen Victoria and Queen Elizabeth II. Victoria was dedicated to her role and knew what she had to do. However, she was the one who brought the monarchy out to the people with the family photographs. She was a strong-willed and intelligent woman and her legacy lives on in pretty much every Royal House of Europe (she was dubbed 'Grandmother of all Europe' after all).

Queen Elizabeth II is dedicated to her job, just like her great-great-grandmother. She does her job well, and is also very intelligent. She is what a monarch should be, and is respected and loved by her subjects and those who live outside of the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth (there are so many posts on this forum that express admiration for this woman, and a great deal of the posters are not British subjects).

Future William V along with his consort Catherine will do great things for their nation and Commonwealth (if such will exist). They're both kind, compassionate, intelligent, and in touch with reality and their people. If we were to go by the response they've received while on tour of Canada and US, then it's clear that people gravitate to these two, and have nothing but good things to say when asked about their impressions. It will be an honor to watch that coronation and reign (hopefully I'll be alive to see it).

George VI showed the world that one didn't have to be perfect to be a monarch. He had a speech impediment, but he was able to overcome it and by doing so, gained confidence and helped his nation (in whatever ways he could) get through World War II. Admirable indeed.

I'd like to add to this list Yekaterina II of Russia, and Aleksandr II of Russia. The former brought art and culture into the nation, and was overall, an Enlightened monarch. She received some thinkers of the Enlightment at her Court. The fact that she was able to take the throne from her husband is no small feat, since Russia was (and still is) a male-dominated society.

Aleksandr II really didn't get his chance to do all the good that he planned to do (that's what happens when people want change right away and refuse to wait just a little bit). However, the abolition of serfdom was a great achievement and earned him a place in history books around the world.
 
For me they have been women

HM Queen Elizabeth II

HM Queen Victoria

HM Queen Elizabeth I
 
It's a very difficult question... According to me, the greatest monarchs of all the time must be very powerful monarchs, and must behave in a very humanly way. This idea in my head, I have always wondered which king of France had been the better king. Louis IX was, for sure, a very good king, and so did Henri IV: they were powerful and very closed to french people. I only have a problem with Louis XIV: he was a great king, during his reign France was very influent. But he victimised Protestants, he opressed people with crippling taxes... So I wouldn't put Louis XIV on my list.
I'm not a specialist of monarchy, I couldn't say who would be one the greatest monarchs of all time... But I think that in the future, Victoria of Sweden will be a very good queen, and so will Prince William.
Oh, I have an idea now: one the greatest monarch of all the time could be, according to me, King Juan Carlos of Spain, because he refused to be dictator Franco's heir. Thanks to Juan Carlos, spanish people are free.
 
Last edited:
It's a very difficult question... According to me, the greatest monarchs of all the time must be very powerful monarchs, and must behave in a very humanly way. This idea in my head, I have always wondered which king of France had been the better king. Louis IX was, for sure, a very good king, and so did Henri IV: they were powerful and very closed to french people. I only have a problem with Louis XIV: he was a great king, during his reign France was very influent. But he victimised Protestants, he opressed people with crippling taxes... So I wouldn't put Louis XIV on my list.
I'm not a specialist of monarchy, I couldn't say who would be one the greatest monarchs of all time... But I think that in the future, Victoria of Sweden will be a very good queen, and so will Prince William.
Oh, I have an idea now: one the greatest monarch of all the time could be, according to me, King Juan Carlos of Spain, because he refused to be dictator Franco's heir. Thanks to Juan Carlos, spanish people are free.

Louis XII was known as 'father of his people',his daughter Claude would have made a good monarch had it not been for the Salic Law,instead she went onto become a much loved Queen Consort.
 
Louis XII was known as 'father of his people',his daughter Claude would have made a good monarch had it not been for the Salic Law,instead she went onto become a much loved Queen Consort.

Yes, you're right. And your answer makes me think that François Ier wasn't a bad king! Even if because of him and his wars, France had to pay a lot (and french people had to suffer, again!).
 
Well, there´s my list:

Saint Louis X of France: No commentaries...
Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor: A great monarch who ruled a huge empire and defeated almost every monarch of his time... Fantastic.
Phillip II of Spain: Other so GREAT empire... He reunited all the Iberia...
Charlemagne: No explanations...
 
Last edited:
If you widen the scope to the world rather than Europe then I would add Hussein of Jordan for his attempts at Arab peace and unity, Liliuokalani of Hawaii for her dignity in adversity and maintenance of Hawaiian culture, Salote of Tonga for her raising of her country's profile and Rama V of Thailand for the great reforms and modernisation of his country.
Richard
 
two ottoman sultans Fatih sultan Mehmed the emperor of constantinopolis and Sulaiman the greatest he makes on his time the ottman empire the biggest empire of the world
 
HH.Sheikh Zayed Bin Sultan Al Nahyan can also be added to the list of great rulers. He is the one who played a major role in uniting seven emirates which is what we call today as UAE after the British decided to leave the Trucial States.
 
I forgot about Henry II

I also wouldn't put Elizabeth II on my list, I feel a great monarch has to do something great or historical; not just live for a long time. Queen Victoria is famous and memorable but again I don't think she did anything great. The only British monarch I could possibly see as being great is George VI and that's quite a stretch.
 
My list

My list of favorite monarchs are....

Saint Louis IX of France
Saint Ferdinand III of Castile
Saint Stephen I of Hungary
Saint Ladislaus I of Hungary
Saint Wenceslaus I of Bohemia
Saint Leopold III Babenberg of Austria
Leopold V Babenberg of Austria (The Virtuous)
Leopold VI Babenberg of Austria (The Glorious)
Friedrich I, Holy Roman Emperor (Barbarossa)
Saint II Heinrich, Holy Roman Emperor
Albert I Ascanian of Brandenburg (The Bear)
Ludwig II Ludowingian of Thuringia (The Iron)
Ludwig I Ludowingian of Thuringia (The Springer)
Philip II of France
Saint Olaf II of Norway
Sigurd I Magnusson of Norway (The Crusader)
Haakon IV Haakonsson of Norway (The Old)
Jan III Sobieski of Poland-Lithuania
Saint Alfred of Wessex (The Great)
Richard I of England (The Lionheart)
Ivan IV Vasilyevich of Russia (The Terrible)
Otto I Ascanian of Brandenburg
Waldemar I Ascanian of Brandenburg (The Great)
Saint Charlemagne
Friedrich II Hohenzollern of Prussia (The Great)
Henry IV of France
Casimir III of Poland (The Great)
Saint Casimir of Poland-Lithuania
Otto I, Holy Roman Emperor (The Great)
David I of Israel

I think my list ist far too long. But I hope I've made my point. There truly are great Monarchs in history and many of these we do not appreciate. It ist only now, in the days when they're gone that we must suffer the rule of lesser people. Each of these people - so beloved as they were - left such a mark on history that at the hour of their deaths, the world became poorer for it. The most people can only expect now is that they can choose some politician who can rival the greatness of kings, however extremely unlikely that ist, for as Alcuin of York once stated,"do not listen to those who keep saying, 'The voice of the people is the voice of God.' because the tumult of the crowd is always close to madness.'"

And in light of the madness of these past few centuries, the Monarchist can either be an optimistic hopeful or a devastated pessimist. It ist not enough to simply feel something for these people, but to act on their legacies that stands us apart from this awful modern age, where Morality is a dream or the subject of fairy tales. As a monarchist, I believe it is my duty - perhaps all of our duties - to ensure that the sacrifices of our ancestors are not in vain.

Side Note:

I would like to state that I had an interest in adding several Wittelbachs, Roman Emperors, Greek Kings, Byzantine Basilius and Persian Monarchs to my list, but that would be over-kill. :flowers:

God bless you reader und thank you for taking the time to read about a common nobody's little set of words.
 
Last edited:
I'd say Elizabeth II is one, as she is what a great monarch these days should be: a respected head of state who respects the monarch's subjects enough to stay out of political affairs and lets them govern themselves.

I'd say that some of the Habsburg rulers were great reformers who let their country proceed towards becoming a democracy, so some of them would also count.

I'd say that King Michael of Romania and Tsar Boris of Bulgaria, both still living, are also two of the best, as they've served their countries selflessly without being repaid much of anything in return.
 
:previous:
Actually Tsar Boris died during WWII under what some still consider mysterious circumstances.
.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top Bottom