The Royal Forums Coat of Arms

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Reigning Houses > British Royals > Queen Elizabeth II and the Duke of Edinburgh

Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #181  
Old 04-15-2009, 09:15 PM
Roslyn's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tintenbar, Australia
Posts: 2,691


Ah! Now this is why astrology is hogwash. I, too, am a Taurus, and while I am hard working (though not always at things that I should be working hard at), stable, secure, stubborn (the last three really just mean set in our ways and resistant to change) and warm, no-one's ever likely to accuse me of being "a sterling example of morality, service, duty before personal happiness, dedication and faultlessly upright behaviour".
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #182  
Old 04-15-2009, 11:59 PM
Russophile's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Portland, United States
Posts: 4,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roslyn View Post


Ah! Now this is why astrology is hogwash. I, too, am a Taurus, and while I am hard working (though not always at things that I should be working hard at), stable, secure, stubborn (the last three really just mean set in our ways and resistant to change) and warm, no-one's ever likely to accuse me of being "a sterling example of morality, service, duty before personal happiness, dedication and faultlessly upright behaviour".
Well for laughs since you dont believe, pick up a copy of Linda Goodman's Sign or Love signs. Enjoy!
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #183  
Old 04-16-2009, 05:02 AM
Skydragon's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London and Highlands, United Kingdom
Posts: 10,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roslyn View Post
no-one's ever likely to accuse me of being "a sterling example of morality, service, duty before personal happiness, dedication and faultlessly upright behaviour".
I am relieved to hear it!
------------------
General reply

Duty before personal happiness is all very well, as long as it is not the personal happiness of someone else that is being sacrificed.

I believe the time will come that she has to hand over the reins to Charles, after all QEQM was somewhat confused in her last years and who would want to see that happen to HM?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #184  
Old 04-16-2009, 07:50 AM
MARG's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 4,081
I'm with Skydragon on this one. Already we are starting to see the PofW appearing more and more prominently, even now there are plans for him to accompany HM on an overseas visit.

She's a canny lady our Queen. I think the increasing frailty of the DofE has changed her outlook on life. That the royal couple married for love has been bourn out by their continued lovingly restrained longevity, but somehow I don't think the notion of traveling abroad alone appeals and so she's starting to bring the "B" team up to scratch.

I think the PofW will become regent in all but name in years to come, particularly after the death of his father. They have been the supreme "Double Act" for too many years for the Queen to view the alternative with any degree of happiness.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skydragon View Post
Duty before personal happiness is all very well, as long as it is not the personal happiness of someone else that is being sacrificed.
I think the royal couple will want to spend as much time together as they can at this stage of their lives.
__________________
MARG
"Words ought to be a little wild, for they are assaults of thoughts on the unthinking." - JM Keynes
Reply With Quote
  #185  
Old 04-16-2009, 07:55 AM
muriel's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 4,947
I can certainly see the point in the Queen slowing down,and whist this has been talked about for a while, I think we may start to see it soon. That said,I sense someof this may be determined by the health of the DoE. He is a very active mind, and as long as he is fit, I am sure he would like to keep himself busy carrying out royal duties.

You are right, the Queen may choose to spend more "private" time with the Duke, and consequently, let Charles gradually increase his role to the point where he is regent in all but name.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #186  
Old 04-16-2009, 11:50 AM
scooter's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: katonah, United States
Posts: 2,376
'I declare before you all, that my whole life, whether it be long or short will be devoted in service to you all' as QE said in 1952. I dont see her turning over the reins to Charles unless she is mentally or physically incapacitated. Unless I am mistaken, there has been no prescedent, other than poor mad King George, for a Regent for a Sovereign who has attained their majority. They rule until death. Charles will hopefully have a long wait. Long Live Queen Elizabeth. England wont see her equal again.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #187  
Old 04-16-2009, 05:06 PM
Skydragon's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London and Highlands, United Kingdom
Posts: 10,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by MARG View Post
I think the PofW will become regent in all but name in years to come, particularly after the death of his father.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muriel
and consequently, let Charles gradually increase his role to the point where he is regent in all but name
I think we are agreed that Charles will perform more of HMs duties, without the need for his mother to step aside or retire completely. Lets hope that with longevity HM remains clear minded.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #188  
Old 04-16-2009, 08:15 PM
BMC's Avatar
BMC BMC is offline
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 206
She'll never abdicate but will turn over more public duties to Prince Charles.

She's a very special lady & the UK is very fortunate to have her as Queen.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #189  
Old 04-16-2009, 09:31 PM
scooter's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: katonah, United States
Posts: 2,376
If you look at the prescedent of Queen Victoria who lived to a great old age, it's highly unlikely that QEII will step down before death. I am sure that Victoria was no longer the sharpest knife in the drawer at the end of her life. If Elizabeth is not incapacitated, I cant see it happening. Nor, I should think, would any subject be in favor of trading in QEII and the Duke of E.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #190  
Old 04-25-2009, 06:25 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 2
I hope not.
I am not the biggest fan of the British Monarchy but i do adore the Queen and everything she does.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #191  
Old 04-25-2009, 10:41 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 237
Hi,

I cannot see The Queen abdicating. She is one of the few now in the world who remembers the 1936 abdication and the upheaval it caused.

But, I can see her retiring more & more and letting Charles and Camilla take over more & more public duties.

The Queen should still open Parliament and hand out Maundy money, etc. but C & C could do most of the rest.
It would be a great way for them to become more ingratiated with the public. And, I think they need that!!!

Larry
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #192  
Old 04-28-2009, 01:38 AM
wbenson's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: -, United States
Posts: 2,238
A digression about Camilla's title and the prospect of altering the succession laws has been removed.

wbenson
British Forums Moderator
__________________
TRF rules and FAQ
Reply With Quote
  #193  
Old 07-28-2009, 10:54 AM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: St Helens, United Kingdom
Posts: 294
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren View Post
Well summed up LauraMCS. After that there really isn't much more to say.
Spot on. From what I understand about the Queen, she is a very deeply religious lady and ever since she was a child, she had a sense of duty. This is the code that both she, her mother and grandmother Queen Mary have all lived by.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #194  
Old 07-28-2009, 08:30 PM
scooter's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: katonah, United States
Posts: 2,376
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catherine Helvin View Post
Spot on. From what I understand about the Queen, she is a very deeply religious lady and ever since she was a child, she had a sense of duty. This is the code that both she, her mother and grandmother Queen Mary have all lived by.
Indeed, this is why I hope that she will rule untill death. I agree that this ...religion (morality) and duty...is the code that QEII, QEQM and QM all lived their whole lives by. Which to me was a moral standard to all...and to me something that a regnant Queen or Queen Consort should exemplify.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #195  
Old 07-28-2009, 09:09 PM
Ella Kay's Avatar
Courtier
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Anywhere, United States
Posts: 952
I firmly believe that HM will reign until her death. If for some reason she became incapacitated and unable to reign, I think Charles would take over as prince regent until her death. I don't think she would ever abdicate.
__________________

"I have to be seen to be believed."
HM The Queen
Reply With Quote
  #196  
Old 07-29-2009, 07:14 AM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: St Helens, United Kingdom
Posts: 294
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ella Kay View Post
I firmly believe that HM will reign until her death. If for some reason she became incapacitated and unable to reign, I think Charles would take over as prince regent until her death. I don't think she would ever abdicate.
Yes, that's what happened with George III.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #197  
Old 07-29-2009, 05:40 PM
scooter's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: katonah, United States
Posts: 2,376
I firmly believe that the only reason that the POW would (or could) become Regent is if HM The Queen was physically or mentally incapacitated. In the absence of that, the POW will have to wait his turn. Long live Queen Elizabeth! An example to us all.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #198  
Old 07-29-2009, 07:00 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 8,495
Quote:
Originally Posted by scooter View Post
I firmly believe that the only reason that the POW would (or could) become Regent is if HM The Queen was physically or mentally incapacitated. In the absence of that, the POW will have to wait his turn. Long live Queen Elizabeth! An example to us all.

I think the only reason for a Regency would be mental incapacity not physical.

Just because the Queen can't do some of the physical side of the role of monarch is no reason for her to have a Regency as she could still do the essential parts of the job - those that require a mental capacity e.g. meeting with the PM and signing the legislation.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #199  
Old 07-29-2009, 08:48 PM
scooter's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: katonah, United States
Posts: 2,376
I agree Iluvbertie, except for example if HM had some kind of head injury or stroke event, which would render her absolutely comatose or physically incapable. I hope that day is decades away and that she lives to QEQM's life span.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #200  
Old 07-29-2009, 11:30 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 8,495
Quote:
Originally Posted by scooter View Post
I agree Iluvbertie, except for example if HM had some kind of head injury or stroke event, which would render her absolutely comatose or physically incapable. I hope that day is decades away and that she lives to QEQM's life span.
Both the examples you have given would render her mentally incapable of doing the job.

I can't think of any physical injury, alone, that would affect her ability to do the job. She could be a quadraplegic and still be mentally capable of being Queen but a head injury, causing mental impairment would result in mental inability. A head injury, by itself won't stop her being able to do the job, only if it also results in a mental inability.
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
abdication, elizabeth ii, queen elizabeth ii, regency, retirement


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ABBA singing "Dancing Queen" for the Swedish King and Queen allison513 Royal House of Sweden 34 11-19-2011 02:24 AM
Queen Fawzia and Queen Soraya were they involved in their country's development ? FarahJoy The Imperial Family of Iran 15 12-15-2009 08:53 PM
Valdemar II the Victorious, Queen Dagmar and Queen Berengária norwegianne Danish Royal History 2 11-10-2007 05:54 PM




Additional Links
Popular Tags
abdication birth charlene crown prince frederik crown prince haakon crown princess mary crown princess mette-marit current events duchess of cambridge dutch royal history engagement fashion genealogy grand duchess maria teresa grand duke henri hohenzollern infanta leonor infanta sofia jewellery jordan king abdullah ii king carl xvi gustav king felipe king felipe vi king harald king juan carlos king philippe king willem-alexander luxembourg olympic games olympics ottoman poland prince albert prince albert ii prince carl philip prince constantijn prince felipe prince floris prince maurits prince pieter-christiaan princess aimee princess anita princess beatrix princess charlene princess claire princess laurentien princess mabel princess madeleine princess margriet princess marilene princess mary princess of asturias queen anne-marie queen letizia queen mathilde queen maxima queen paola queen rania queen silvia royal royal fashion russia sofia hellqvist spain state visit sweden the hague visit wedding



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:19 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014
Jelsoft Enterprises

Royal News Delivered to your Email!

You can get the latest Royal News right in your inbox.

unsusbcribe at anytime with one click

Close [X]