 |
|

06-02-2010, 03:35 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Carlton, York, United Kingdom
Posts: 15,620
|
|
|
Well seeing as it is "former" why can't she go?
__________________
We Will Remember Them.
|

06-06-2010, 04:39 AM
|
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,500
|
|
|
Let's hope the Queen will attend the 2014 Commonwealth Games !
After all, it's not far from Balmoral to Glasgow !
|

06-06-2010, 06:43 AM
|
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 6,997
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lumutqueen
Well seeing as it is "former" why can't she go?
|
Because State Visits take a long time to organise and three months isn't enough, particularly given the terrorist threats already made for these games.
The Australian government, for instance is monitoring the terrorist threat before fully committing to sending an Australian team (at the moment we are definitely sending a team but if the security advice changes the government won't let them go - remember last year or the year before the Australia tennis team refused to play their Davis Cup tie there and dropped down a level in that competition as a result).
|

06-06-2010, 02:13 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Carlton, York, United Kingdom
Posts: 15,620
|
|
|
But why would it constitute a state visit?
Would she be going for the whole of the games?
__________________
We Will Remember Them.
|

06-06-2010, 04:38 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: , Antarctica
Posts: 2,022
|
|
|
I think it has more to do with the security threats more than anything. Generally, when the Queen opens up the games, she will make a "state" visit to the hosting country as well. Kill two birds with one stone. But this time it is different and perhaps there is a state visit in the works already for India and they cant afford to go twice. Who knows?
__________________
|

03-12-2013, 06:16 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Posts: 5,431
|
|
Falklands Referendum: Overwhelming Majority Wants to Remain UK Overseas Territory
Quote:
|
In a very clear expression of self-determination and loyalty to the Crown, the people of the Falkland Islands have voted overwhelmingly in favour of remaining a UK overseas territory. The referendum had asked a simple question: “Do you wish the Falkland Islands to retain their current political status as an Overseas Territory of the United Kingdom?” Over 90% of the island’s population eligible to vote took part in the referendum, and of 1,517 votes cast 1,513 were in favour, with only three people voting against.
|
I suppose this belongs here.
|

03-12-2013, 02:30 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Somewhere, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,624
|
|
I do hope that the Argentinians, and others, respect the decision of the people of the Falkland Islands and that their right to self-determination is assured. I won't hold my breath.
This article is mainly about the upcoming documentary on the Queen, but also suggests that the leaders of the Commonwealth are coming to the conclusion that the Prince of Wales should follow his mother as Head of the Commonwealth, despite its not being an hereditary appointment. The PoW was specifically mentioned by the Commonwealth Secretary General, Kamalesh Sharma.
Cosy and comfy, one's sitting room: Cluttered with treasures and just a little bit messy, the Queen's private retreat | Mail Online
The BBC is also picking up on the same hints from last night's event:
BBC News - Who will lead Commonwealth next?
|

03-12-2013, 02:41 PM
|
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto (ON) & London (UK), Canada
Posts: 4,402
|
|
|
Actually the Argentinian government has already made clear that the feeling and the vote of the people of the Falklands in irrelevant as far as they are concerned. To them the islands belong to Argentina no matter what the people who live there think. They do not recognize the idea of self determination.
At least it distracts them from their own serious domestic economic problems.
|

03-12-2013, 02:56 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Carlton, York, United Kingdom
Posts: 15,620
|
|
|
I did find it quite amusing when I heard that the Argentinians felt this vote was "irrelevant" I laughed and said "yeah just because you lost". I don't know much about the politics of this, I don't even know if there is much to know. But do the Argentinians want the Falklands back just so we can't have it?
__________________
We Will Remember Them.
|

03-12-2013, 03:27 PM
|
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 6,997
|
|
|
There is oil in the waters that belong to the Falklands - enough said.
|

03-12-2013, 03:28 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Somewhere, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,624
|
|
|
They believe that the people in the Falkland Islands have been 'planted' there by the British. So the fact that some of them have lived there for up to 12 or 13 generations doesn't mean anything. They believe that the population should just be sent back to the UK.
They fail to acknowledge that there was no indigenous population on the islands and there was no successful settlement there until the British took them over.
The irony is in the Argentinians claiming that the Falklands are a British 'colony' and that they belong to Argentina. Argentina didn't exist as a sovereign state when the islands were populated by the British. By the logic that they use, Argentina itself should be handed back to the indigenous peoples whose home it was before the Spanish came and colonised it.
|

03-12-2013, 03:30 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Carlton, York, United Kingdom
Posts: 15,620
|
|

Thanks for the info EIIR, it seems to be the case of we'll take it so you can't have it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie
There is oil in the waters that belong to the Falklands - enough said.
|
Now that I didn't know, but it's not surprising.
__________________
We Will Remember Them.
|

05-07-2013, 01:41 AM
|
 |
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: -, United States
Posts: 2,139
|
|
Queen To Miss Commonwealth Heads' Meeting
The Queen will miss the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting for the first time since 1973, Sky News has learned.
Sources say Prince Charles is set to be announced as the member of the royal family to attend the meeting on her behalf in Sri Lanka later this year.
|

05-07-2013, 02:20 AM
|
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 6,997
|
|
|
That isn't a real surprise given both her age and the location of the CHOGM. That is nothing against Sri Lanka which I believe is a beautiful country but it is very hot and humid being a tropical country and for a woman who is used to the more moderate climate in the UK the change, even for a couple of days, would be extreme. She also has an even older husband and has never done an overseas tour without Philip.
It would be wonderful to see Charles undertake this tour on her behalf, with Camilla to accompany him as well, even though she loathes the heat.
All of this assumes that the report is in fact accurate.
|

05-07-2013, 06:37 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,948
|
|
BBC News - Queen to miss Commonwealth meeting
BBc report on the Queen not attending. The analysis section is interesting in that it talks about "expect to see less of her".
As I mentioned in another thread a while ago, she has cut back engagements and here is another sample. Quite right IMO.
__________________
This precious stone set in the silver sea,......
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England,
|

05-07-2013, 06:43 AM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 2,587
|
|
Peter Hunt @BBCPeterHunt 3h
The CHOGM decision by Buckingham Palace is an acknowledgement of the Queen's age and of the need to limit her overseas travel.
__________________
“The only guide to man is his conscience; the only shield to his memory is the rectitude and sincerity of his actions. It is very imprudent to walk through life without this shield, because we are so often mocked by the failure of our hopes and the upsetting of our calculations; but with this shield, however the fates may play, we march always in the ranks of honor.”
Sir Winston Churchill
|

05-07-2013, 05:09 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Carlton, York, United Kingdom
Posts: 15,620
|
|
|
When Palmer tweeted the story and it said "historic royal announcement" I was intrigued, turned out it was nothing. Didn't they ban The Queen from walking up some steps a while ago? It shouldn't come as a surprise that she's ageing or made it is a surprise for the daily express:)
__________________
We Will Remember Them.
|

05-07-2013, 05:12 PM
|
|
Gentry
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: MO, United States
Posts: 54
|
|
|
It's only natural that at 87 that she doesn't make as many long-haul foreign/commonwealth trips. Charles could definitely use more Commonwealth experience, and this is a great way for him to do so.
I don't see this is as a sign of any major health issues or a major slowing down, just a gradual paring back of activities. I don't think we'll see her go overseas anymore except maybe to Canada (and even then I'm not sure that's a given anymore). I don't think anyone expects her to do so at her age.
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Links |
|
|
|