![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Portal | Blogs | Articles | Calendar | Register | FAQ | Members List | Royal Links | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Chat Room |
![]() |
|||||
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
It is not the politics that bothers me (it is really interesting to learn this stuff about canada cuz I woudl otherwise not care). It is just hta I come to the BRF thread and I see this. It is just so odd.
__________________
*Under Construction* |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
It is not odd to those of us who have the Queen as their head of state.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
But you see that is it. Canadians have her as a head of state (as well as others) and you have a GG who is a representative and you guys get to talk about domestic politics! It doesn't bother me that you guys do, but it is just odd that this gets allowed in the BRF forum. Gosh with the thread on hurricane katrina and with posters being warned to not talk about politics and to come to this thread...that is a bit sketchy.
P.S. I am not looking for a fight so you canadians and all-powerful mods/admins have your fun whatever is decided. I was just expressing my thoughts.
__________________
*Under Construction* Last edited by Reina; 10-02-2005 at 01:14 AM. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
This particular GG is in a unique position as she has been outspoken at times about how she feels about the Quebec separatist situation, and as she now represents the Queen and the Queen is to be neutral in terms of politics, I think such a discussion is fair play. We now have a representative to the Queen who has a clear (though I guess becoming murkier by the minute to avoid controversy) opinon about a very important, essential identity issue in Canada, when she should really be neutral. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
the only reason a political discussion was relevant in this case was because the new GG's appointment stirred up controversy at the beginning regarding her own alleged political beliefs in the past. Its a discussion that the Canadians on this board are well aware of and that is why we are discussing it.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yep. In the British Royal Family Forum. I think I'll start a thread on Tony Blair. He is the Queen's representative of something isn't he.
__________________
*Under Construction* |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Thanks to my fellow Canadians for such a lively and interesting discussion abour our Canadian Crown. It's been a great read. I am doing a piece for my Journalism class on the future of the Canadian monarchy and the relevancy of the commonwealth and I'm so relieved there are other people who actually know how the Crown operates in our country. Too bad I didn't find this topic sooner as I would have loved to discuss the subject, but you guys and gals have taken the words right out of my mouth. :) |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
A governor general is not the same as a PM. A PM runs the government, the GG doesnt.
A PM represents a particular political party, the GG is beyond partisan politics. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Look again, I am not trying to start a fight. But how long do you guys plan to talk about this GG stuff-in the British Royal Family forum?? COme on this isn't hard. Posters on here try really hard to abide by the rules, but the GG has become an exception. This is too crass-no make that stupid, foolish, and stupid! Now please if you guys are going to continue this foolishness than just screw me and tell me to shut up. And if you want to erase my posts that refer to my feelings of where this thread is. But like I said b/f, it is great to learn all this about canada, but it is in a totally inappropo place. This isn't rocket science!
__________________
*Under Construction* |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
That's fine if you disagree with the Administrative decision that has been made, but it's no reason to call someone or the decision crass -- no make that stupid, foolish, and stupid. Nobody is trying to screw you around. The decision is clear. Even though I do not normally advocate this, if you don't want to participate, or feel that this thread is inappropriate, then simply don't visit this thread. Those who are interested in discussing it can continue to do so without distracting side comments and judgements that are coming from an uninformed place or comments that are simply mocking. Alexandria, as a fellow member, not as an Administrator |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
I did not refer to a person as being crass, etc. I said this as in this situation. But you are not only a fellow member, an administrator, you are using your power as a moderator for your own convenience. ANd it isn't right.
__________________
*Under Construction* |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
So I am really in the same "predicament" as anyone else. I frankly don't care where this thread actually is physically located within the forum. I do think however that the discussion is a relevant and important one and relates well within the confines of this forum. I am not the only member who feels this -- other members have stated their belief about the relevancy of this topic as well. Members who are not moderators and who are not using their power as a moderator for their own convenience. So now we have a situation where it is only one member who disagrees and opposes with a decision that an Adminstrator has made while many others have (openly) supported it and see the legitimacy of such a topic. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ok. Well you mods are always stressing the rules of sticking to royalty and not politics. Where in the rules does it state that if a majority of posters (but who said that most of them feel this way anyway) want a certain topic they can keep it. You mods are always stressing this rules. Yet I get criticized cuz I was trying to follow them. Mandy calls me a bully. You say I am misinformed. I guess I am cuz I just I did not realize that the Governor's General is a member of the British royal family.
__________________
*Under Construction* |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
The forum isnt just about members of various royal families, it is also about related issues. In other forums too political discussions that are relevant to a certain royal house are discussed (the JRF forum for example). Same goes for the British forum. Queen Elizabeth, who is the head of the British royal house, also happens to be Queen of countries like Canada, Australia etc.
These countries have strong historic ties with the British crown. As such any discussion regarding the place of the Crown and the Queen in Canada is relevant, so is a discussion about her vice-regal representative. There was a thread in this forum about the Commonwealth a while back. That wasnt directly related to any member of the BRF either but I dont recall anyone complaining then. Last edited by Humera; 10-02-2005 at 02:19 AM. |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Princess BellyFlop and altagrace ...nice meeting you , im also a french-canadian...as a immigrant ( origninaly from morocco ) im glad that Paul Martin choose Michaelle Jean as a Governor general for Canada :)
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Good grief!
This morning I started reading the thread where I had left yesterday - about page 3. I was so happy that in this thread about the Governor General I have the very rare opportunity to exchange information and opinions with fellow Canadians from all over the country, in a very polite, very respectful and civilised manner - an even rarer opportunity for us Canadians. I was surprised and shockly sad to read repeated attacks on the existence of this thread from a member who is not even directly concerned by this special event. This might be a «Canadian» event but it is directly related to the British Monarchy as the Governor General is our Queen representative and our head of state. This is a very big event for us that is bringing discussion in our society like probably no other nomination has ever had before as some are questionning not only their appartenance to our beautiful country and others the utility of that official function and whether or not we still need to be associated with our Majesty. |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
It's unfortunate that one person who is not directly affected by this new GG voiced such opposition to the existence of this thread. I am not saying that you need to be personally affected or even affected by a distance by an event to make a comment, but when members are not directly affected by an event or an individual they show more respect than what was shown here. I think this thread has opened a wonderful dialogue amongst Canadian members of this forum. The discussion here is very intelligent and insightful and has not relegated to superflous fawning or drooling or anger and unjustified criticism. I think it's one of the most intelligent and mature threads here and I thank Mandy for keeping this thread open in the proper place. :) I hope that the discussion will continue. |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
And if we go back to our main beautiful subject: Madame Jean our Governor General.
I do not know how to call her. I surprised myself calling her Michaelle in conversation with friends. Must be because of her last television program that was called that way and her accessibility. Here in the news we saw many new Canadians, many young Haitians, mentionning how important it is for them to see someone like her in this prestigious position and how she is a model of hope. I also like the mission she chose for herself: no more solitudes. Big big agenda! Maybe we had enough of that «deux solitudes» (two solitudes) motto that describe us so sadly and we start doing something about trying to change it all together with Michaelle, oups Madame Jean. Did my ROC friends hear about that mission of her and what do you think about it? |
![]() |
| Tags |
| british commonwealth, canada, elizabeth ii, governor general, monarchy versus republic, parliament, queen elizabeth ii |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Queen and Australia, Residences, Governor General, etc... | happy_27 | Queen Elizabeth II and the Duke of Edinburgh | 216 | 11-15-2009 07:06 AM |
| General discussion about royal residences | auroraDaniel | British Royal Residences | 36 | 09-12-2009 06:26 PM |
| Swedish Residences General Discussion | Josefine | Swedish Royal Residences | 35 | 03-06-2009 02:01 PM |
| Danish Residences General Discussion | Alexandra | Danish Royal Residences | 42 | 03-23-2008 05:11 PM |
| General Discussion about Belgian Royal Residences | Cathérine Bergeyck | Belgian Royal Residences | 2 | 01-30-2006 05:59 AM |