Monika_
Aristocracy
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2008
- Messages
- 189
- City
- New York
- Country
- United States
Roslyn, the point I was trying to make was that we see both scenarios quoted as validation for what the Queen/RF did or didn't do. On the one hand, the RF was grieving and therefore they were too upset to do this or that and, on the other, there was no reason for them to do this or that because she had no longer been a member of the family. It just seems to be an attempt to justify certain actions, or the lack thereof, from every angle.
Marg, you may not agree with what I've said or approve of the source, but people were quoted in the book and in all these years we have yet to hear a flat out denial. Surely someone would have gotten to the 'truth' by now if it were wholly inaccurate.
Marg, you may not agree with what I've said or approve of the source, but people were quoted in the book and in all these years we have yet to hear a flat out denial. Surely someone would have gotten to the 'truth' by now if it were wholly inaccurate.
Last edited by a moderator: