The only source should be the official communications from the Tribunal of Justice or the Office of the Attorney-General (
Fiscalía General del Estado in Spanish). Not sensational media hypes.
Despite being a co-owner of the company Aizoon and being a member of the board of Nóos Institute (both organizatons involved in this case), Infanta Doña Cristina finally would
not be prosecuted. The Tribunal of Justice in the case, as well the Prosecutor of the Balearic Isles, as well the Office of the Attorney-General agreed and maintain that, as is clear from the testimony of various accused people and showed by documents seized, that there is no indication that Infanta Doña Cristina participated in the activities or the management of the companies involved or was involved in the core decisionmaking. For these same reasons, the Attorney General's Office rejected a private complaint filed against the Infanta by a lawyer.
A certain and vigorously active Judge of Instruction kept going on against the Infanta and finally she was heard in the procedure. The "blaming everything on someone else than herself" as some posters claim seem not funded by what has been recorded from the hearings:
Judge: Do you have legal knowledge?
The Infanta: No.
Judge: Do you have tax knowledge?
The Infanta: No.
Judge: Do you know about the PADRE program?
The Infanta: I heard about it, but no.
Judge: Do you have economic expertise?
The Infanta: No, very basic, but no.
The rest of the hearing went in that pattern. She blamed no one at all. Not Mr Diego Torres, not anyone else of the nine accused. She blamed no one. Things seem to get an own life on this forum which are not very corresponding to reality.