The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #101  
Old 12-08-2016, 07:47 AM
Skippyboo's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Atlanta, United States
Posts: 4,147
If Andrew wants his future son in laws to have a title, then B & E need to marry one not hope that Uncle Charles or Granny makes them one.

The Queen already has 3 great grandchildren who are just Miss Tindall and Miss Philips with another on the way. Peter and Zara's kids have no title and if Mark did accept that earldom, Zara kids wouldn't have a title and Isla and Savannah would be Honorable Miss until Mark died, Peter inherits a title that would be extinct after him since he has just sisters and daughters. Would Lady Savannah and Lady Isla have a huge social advantage over Miss Mia Tindall and her sibling? No.

Sarah Chatto is the granddaughter of King George VI. Her kids have no title. All the Kents and Gloucesters who are not directly in line for the Dukedom will have no titles in time.
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 12-08-2016, 08:27 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Philadelphia, United States
Posts: 3,973
Eh, I always think people are better off with a title. (Especially if they don't have to do charitable work to justify them).

But if the York girls feel that way, they'd better hurry up and marry!
I don't see Charles giving Andrew anything he wants!
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 12-08-2016, 08:41 AM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 10,174
To be honest, after all the years and the not so honorable messes that Andrew has gotten himself into either willingly or unwillingly, I don't see Charles giving him an inch either. Charles takes his duties and responsibilities far too seriously to just pacify a younger brother's whims.

I also think that Charles is going to be very involved and very particular when it comes to handing out any kind of honors and accolades too. After all these years as Prince of Wales and getting involved in all aspects of just about anything he puts his name on, I don't see Charles as being anyone's "yes" man but will listen to opinions from all quarters before making a decision. On titles and orders and such for his own family, he'll do what he believes is right.
__________________
To finish the moment, to find the journey's end in every step of the road, to live the greatest numbers of good hours, is wisdom.

~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 12-08-2016, 04:09 PM
duke of poliganc's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: cairo, Egypt
Posts: 606
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skippyboo View Post
If Andrew wants his future son in laws to have a title, then B & E need to marry one not hope that Uncle Charles or Granny makes them one.

The Queen already has 3 great grandchildren who are just Miss Tindall and Miss Philips with another on the way. Peter and Zara's kids have no title and if Mark did accept that earldom, Zara kids wouldn't have a title and Isla and Savannah would be Honorable Miss until Mark died, Peter inherits a title that would be extinct after him since he has just sisters and daughters. Would Lady Savannah and Lady Isla have a huge social advantage over Miss Mia Tindall and her sibling? No.

Sarah Chatto is the granddaughter of King George VI. Her kids have no title. All the Kents and Gloucesters who are not directly in line for the Dukedom will have no titles in time.
because princess anne refused that her children have title and that's her own choice and that also should be princess eugenie and beatrice choice if they won't a title for their spouse and children or not, because their aunt choose that she didn't wont it dosen't mean that they should be denied the choice that she had
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 12-08-2016, 04:15 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 10,174
Quote:
Originally Posted by duke of poliganc View Post
because princess anne refused that her children have title and that's her own choice and that also should be princess eugenie and beatrice choice if they won't a title for their spouse and children or not, because their aunt choose that she didn't wont it dosen't mean that they should be denied the choice that she had
I think the big difference will be that Anne was the daughter of the monarch and Beatrice and Eugenie are granddaughters of the monarch and if left until Charles is King, they'll be nieces of the monarch.

The Queen didn't offer any kind of a title to Mike Tindall when Zara married and other than not having a title, Zara shares the same relationship with HM as Beatrice and Eugenie do.
__________________
To finish the moment, to find the journey's end in every step of the road, to live the greatest numbers of good hours, is wisdom.

~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 12-08-2016, 04:37 PM
duke of poliganc's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: cairo, Egypt
Posts: 606
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi View Post
I think the big difference will be that Anne was the daughter of the monarch and Beatrice and Eugenie are granddaughters of the monarch and if left until Charles is King, they'll be nieces of the monarch.

The Queen didn't offer any kind of a title to Mike Tindall when Zara married and other than not having a title, Zara shares the same relationship with HM as Beatrice and Eugenie do.
but like u said zara isn't a princess like Beatrice and Eugenie and they are like princess alexandra granddaughters of a monarch and princess alexandra wasn't even offered the earldom by her grandfather or uncle but by her cousin .
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 12-08-2016, 05:02 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 10,174
From what I've been reading so far though, its Andrew that's making all the noise. We have absolutely no idea if either Beatrice or Eugenie and the men that they marry will even want a title when the time comes.

Its just my opinion but I do think that Andrew is a bit on the pompous side.
__________________
To finish the moment, to find the journey's end in every step of the road, to live the greatest numbers of good hours, is wisdom.

~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old 12-08-2016, 05:08 PM
Marty91charmed's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Near Verona and Venice, Italy
Posts: 6,074
Mine is pure speculation, but I think that only Beatrice of the two girls, actually care for a title.... I don't see Eugenie and her boyfreind for that matter making any tantrum about it... All in all, I agree that it is maybe Andrew who is dipleased with it...
__________________
"Yet, walking free upon her own estate
Still,in her solitude, she is the Queen".
Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old 12-08-2016, 05:19 PM
EllieCat's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Invercargill, New Zealand
Posts: 429
i think it sounds a bit odd in this day and age, and how do we know it's true, anyway, since it comes from an unnamed source.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #110  
Old 12-08-2016, 05:52 PM
Countessmeout's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 7,678
There is no knowing even Andrew is making a fuss

The media likes to make scapegoats. No reporter knows private conversations. They are covering their asses. If Eugenie and her husband get a titles when she married one day, the press 'oh look we were right, whiny Andy got his way.' Or if wrong 'Charles put down his foot.' Either way Andrew and his daughters come out looking bad.

I think will come down to what their future role is. If they are even part time royals, I see their husbands offered a title. If they get pushed out all together, which makes little sense, then their kids will be like the Philippe kids, and no need for a title. As for Snowden, there is no saying it will go extinct. Would not be the first time a holder petitioned for a daughter to inherit, Louis Mountbatten for instance. It is possible Peter could ask for it to be done for his daughters.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #111  
Old 12-08-2016, 06:07 PM
duke of poliganc's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: cairo, Egypt
Posts: 606
Quote:
Originally Posted by Countessmeout View Post
There is no knowing even Andrew is making a fuss

The media likes to make scapegoats. No reporter knows private conversations. They are covering their asses. If Eugenie and her husband get a titles when she married one day, the press 'oh look we were right, whiny Andy got his way.' Or if wrong 'Charles put down his foot.' Either way Andrew and his daughters come out looking bad.

I think will come down to what their future role is. If they are even part time royals, I see their husbands offered a title. If they get pushed out all together, which makes little sense, then their kids will be like the Philippe kids, and no need for a title. As for Snowden, there is no saying it will go extinct. Would not be the first time a holder petitioned for a daughter to inherit, Louis Mountbatten for instance. It is possible Peter could ask for it to be done for his daughters.
why would the current earl of Snowdon petitioned for a daughter to inherit he has a hier who is David Armstrong-Jones, Viscount Linley the son of princess margaret who also have a heir who is the Honourable Charles Armstrong-Jones .
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 12-08-2016, 07:07 PM
Skippyboo's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Atlanta, United States
Posts: 4,147
I think that would be a typo. I believe the poster is talking about if Mark Philips took an Earldom when he married Anne. The Earldom would stop after Peter since there are no other sons of Mark and Peter just has 2 girls. The often cited Mountbatten Earldom only allows for the Earl's daughters to inherit after that is goes to males. A female granddaughter could not inherit.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 12-09-2016, 08:39 AM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NN, Lithuania
Posts: 1,540
‏@TeenageCancer Lots of festive decoration making @uclh this morning with our Patrons @SarahTheDuchess, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie
https://twitter.com/TeenageCancer/st...91790243770368
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 12-09-2016, 08:44 AM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NN, Lithuania
Posts: 1,540
@TeenageCancer
"We're ready!" Great to hear from our enthusiastic Patrons about working to support young with cancer
https://twitter.com/TeenageCancer/st...84271496609792


@TeenageCancer 1h1 hour ago
We're very excited to welcome our Patrons @sarahtheduchess, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie to meet young people on our unit at UCH!
https://twitter.com/TeenageCancer/st...82752520998912


**Pic**
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 12-09-2016, 12:17 PM
iceflower's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: , Germany
Posts: 38,691


Here are some more pics:


** standard: Duchess of York in plea to 'stop bullying Beatrice and Eugenie' during Teenage Cancer Trust visit **


** dailymail: Where’s your ring Eugenie? Princess steps out without her rumoured engagement band as she joins sister Beatrice and mother Sarah.. **
__________________
**** Welcome aboard! ****
Reply With Quote
  #116  
Old 12-09-2016, 01:34 PM
loonytick's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Tennessee, United States
Posts: 363
Is it just me, or does Fergie out and out asking for relief from the press for her daughters sound odd? Perhaps she's decided to take a page from Prince Harry's statement defending his girlfriend? It just feels like one of the York parents again trying to wave the spotlight over to their daughters. I wish I could find video of her making those remarks, in order to see what expressions Bea and Eug had as she said that (if they were next to her at that moment).
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #117  
Old 12-09-2016, 01:34 PM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: *******, Canada
Posts: 6,242
Prince Andrew rubbishes claims he asked for future husbands of Bea and Eug to have titles and says there is no 'split' whatsoever between him and Charles

Statement:

Ow.ly - AY.pdf uploaded by @TheDukeOfYork (The Duke of York)
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #118  
Old 12-09-2016, 01:46 PM
Skippyboo's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Atlanta, United States
Posts: 4,147
Good for Andrew to set the record straight.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #119  
Old 12-09-2016, 01:49 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Charlotte, United States
Posts: 135
What an odd (and poorly edited) statement. Should we expect the RF to put out statements for every rumor now?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #120  
Old 12-09-2016, 01:52 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Durham, United States
Posts: 1,335
Quote:
Originally Posted by loonytick View Post
Is it just me, or does Fergie out and out asking for relief from the press for her daughters sound odd? Perhaps she's decided to take a page from Prince Harry's statement defending his girlfriend? It just feels like one of the York parents again trying to wave the spotlight over to their daughters. I wish I could find video of her making those remarks, in order to see what expressions Bea and Eug had as she said that (if they were next to her at that moment).
Agree! Just seems like Sarah doing her usual thing ..... look at me, look at me (my daughters). She needs to go into retirement. IMHO.
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
duke of york, prince andrew, princess beatrice, princess eugenie, sarah duchess of york, sarah ferguson


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
York Family News and Pictures 1: September 2003-September 2015 Martine Current Events Archive 1441 09-14-2015 05:00 AM
Princess Beatrice of York News and Pictures 2: August 2004-August 2005 samitude Current Events Archive 185 08-08-2005 05:01 AM
Princess Beatrice of York News and Pictures 1: May 2003-July 2004 Josefine Current Events Archive 83 07-27-2004 05:18 PM




Popular Tags
archduchess marie astrid birthday books carl gustaf chris o'neill crown princess elisabeth crown princess victoria crown princess victoria daytime fashion current events denmark duke of york emma family general news grand duke henri hereditary grand duchess stéphanie hereditary grand duke guillaume infanta cristina infanta leonor infanta sofia iñaki urdangarín jewels king felipe king felipe vi king juan carlos king philippe king willem-alexander letizia liechtenstein love meme monarchy monarchy versus republic news prince alexander prince carl philip prince daniel prince felix prince gabriel prince harry prince harry of wales prince nicholas prince oscar princess beatrice princess claire of luxembourg princess estelle princess leonore princess madeleine princess margaretha of luxembourg princess of asturias princess sofia princess victoria queen elizabeth ii queen letizia queen letizia casual outfits queen letizia daytime fashion queen letizia fashion queen mathilde queen maxima queen silvia queen sofia shaikh zayed bin hamdan bin zayed al nahyan sofia state visit stephanie sweden swedish royal family victoria visit from spain zog



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:27 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2018
Jelsoft Enterprises