.I agree that the majority of the fallout will be on Andrew, as it should be. The best case scenario is his terrible judgement by choosing to be seen with Epstein after Epstein's conviction.
I think his judgment was terrible during his whole friendship, since the late 1990’s. Andrew saw the young girls coming and going; he knew they weren’t housekeepers or waitstaff.
He observed and participated in a louche lifestyle even if he never touched any of the girls in a sexual way. A 40 year old man wouldn’t ordinarily get a foot massage from a teenaged girl.
And Epstein, while praised for his intellect and charm, was known to be coarse and crude- just take a look at the decor of his homes. He had velvet slippers with a silver screw on the right one and an embroidered “U” on the other one. He was known to interrupt the conversations between guests with the phrase “what does this have to do with parsley?” Only the word wasn’t “parsley”.
Whatever he did for Andrew, Andrew wanted to return favors- like, maybe, with invitations to his mother’s homes. Did he ever invite his friend to Royal Lodge? (bet not)
I think most people think, or at least hope, that Andrew wasn’t involved in committing a crime. But it’s impossible to deny that he was involved in a very sordid situation.