Read more: May we marry Ma'am: The Queen welcomes Eugenie's boyfriend Jack Brooksbank | Royal | News | Daily ExpressTHE NERVOUSNESS of nearly newlyweds is etched on the faces of Princess Eugenie and her boyfriend Jack Brooksbank as they land in Scotland seeking the Queen’s blessing for their forthcoming engagement.
Smiling cautiously and dressed smartly, the lovestruck couple landed last week to spend the weekend with Her Majesty at Balmoral Castle.
As our world exclusive pictures show, the Duke and Duchess of York’s 26-year-old daughter is introducing the nightclub manager to her beloved “Granny” in the relaxed atmosphere of the 90-year-old monarch’s Highlands retreat, where Prince Harry is hosting a shooting party to celebrate his 32nd birthday.
To add to the excitement of the occasion, Theresa May is also among the guests as the Prime Minister makes her first visit to the Queen’s holiday home in Royal Deeside this weekend. Last month, the Sunday Express revealed that Eugenie and Jack plan to get engaged within months and marry next year before moving into Ivy Cottage at Kensington Palace.
Bet you the story is that Eugenie and Jack have been visiting the Queen at Balmoral, and so its being spun as them going to ask the Queen for permission to marry. Obviously overlooking the fact when the Express tried to claim its last exclusive that they were going to marry within the year Eugenie was with the Queen so surely they wouldn't now go and ask permission and not just do it back then if they were planning to marry? The Express is becoming like a dog with a bone over this
As others have said, Eugenie is now only 8th in line to the throne and, under the Succession to the Crown Act 2013, only the first six persons in the line of succession require the Queen's consent declared in the Privy Council and signified under the Great Seal of the United Kingdom to get married without losing their succession rights.
Nothing prevents Eugenie though from asking the Queen's consent as a grandmother on a personal capacity. Note that the "consent in council" referred above is actually the government's consent really more so than the Queen's, as the "Queen in council" is bound by ministerial advice.
I think they've relaxed on having friends and romantic partners come and stay at the Balmoral estate these days. Its only strictly family for Christmas.
BTW: Charles does not own any property on the estate. He has use of Birkhall, the Queen Mother's former residence but it all still belongs to the Queen as her personal property. Charles will inherit it when he becomes King.
Interesting event for Eugenie.
Princess Eugenie joins Theresa May to commemorate abolitionist William Wilberforce | Daily Mail Online
Not surprising, last month Beatrice and Eugenie were hit hard with headlines that they were descended from slave owners.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...-jane-austen-modern-rroyalty-eugenie-beatrice
Most royals are proud that they can trace their lineage back centuries. But princesses Beatrice and Eugenie may be reluctant to delve too far into their past. New analysis reveals that Prince Andrew’s daughters are the direct descendants of a major slave-owning family.
The link comes through their maternal grandmother, Susan Barrantes, née Wright, Sarah Ferguson’s mother, who is descended from Sir Henry Fitzherbert, a fabulously wealthy aristocrat who in the 18th century owned sugar plantations and more than 1,000 slaves in Jamaica and Barbados.
This is PR 101, take bad press and try to change the narrative.
Frankly this is an unnecessary comment. Many families have "skeletons" in their cupboard.
However, sensible people do not visit the sins of g,g,g,g,grandparents on the descendents.
Unnecessary? Okay...
I did not blame them for Fitzherbert's behavior. I don't blame them for their parents behavior, either.
I'm just saying this is standard PR. They were likely embarrassed by all the headlines last month and this is their non-verbal way of commenting on that story.
Clearly, you believe the slavery headlines quickly countered by the abolitionist headlines was just a really bizarre coincidence. I disagree.
I certainly dont believe that the BRF knee jerk react to a scumbag publication like the Daily Mail. I'd even be surprised if they read it.
if they did that, they would never get on with anything. They are chockful of ancesters that did bad stuff. They live and respond to events today.